Skip to main content
Log in

Fistulojejunostomy Versus Distal Pancreatectomy for the Management of the Disconnected Pancreas Remnant Following Necrotizing Pancreatitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background

A disconnected distal pancreas (DDP) remnant is a morbid sequela of necrotizing pancreatitis. Definitive surgical management can be accomplished by either fistulojejunostomy (FJ) or distal pancreatectomy (DP). It is unclear which operative approach is superior with regard to short- and long-term outcomes.

Methods

Between 2002 and 2014, patients undergoing either FJ or DP for DDP were retrospectively identified at a center specializing in pancreatic diseases. Patient demographics, perioperative, and postoperative variables were evaluated.

Results

Forty-two patients with DDP secondary to necrotizing pancreatitis underwent either a FJ (n = 21) or DP (n = 21). Between the two cohorts, there were no significant differences in overall lengths of stay, pancreatic leak rates, or readmission rates (all p > 0.05). DP was associated with higher estimated blood loss, increased transfusion requirements, and worsening endocrine function (all p < 0.05). At a median follow-up of 18 months, four patients that underwent a FJ developed a recurrent fluid collection requiring re-intervention. Overall, FJ was successful in 80% of patients as compared to a 95% success rate for DP (p = 0.15).

Conclusions

Although DP was associated with higher intraoperative blood loss, increased transfusion requirements, and worsening of preoperative diabetes, this procedure provides superior long-term resolution of a DDP when compared to FJ.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Banks PA. Infected necrosis: morbidity and therapeutic consequences. Hepatogastroenterology 1991;38:116–119

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Imrie CW. Underdiagnosis of acute pancreatitis. Adv Acute Pancreatitis 1997;1:3–5

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ramia, J. M., de la Plaza, R., Quiñones-Sampedro, J. E., Ramiro, C., Veguillas, P., & García-Parreño, J. Walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Netherlands Journal of Medicine 2012; 70(4), 168–171. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i14.1707

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kozarek, R. A., & Traverso, L. W. Pancreatic fistulas: etiology, consequences, and treatment. Gastroenterologist 1996; 4(4), 238–244.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Howard, T. J., Rhodes, G. J., Selzer, D. J., Sherman, S., Fogel, E., & Lehman, G. A. Roux-en-Y internal drainage is the best surgical option to treat patients with disconnected duct syndrome after severe acute pancreatitis. Surgery 2001; 130(4), 714–721. doi: 10.1067/msy.2001.116675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tann, M., Maglinte, D., Howard, T. J., Sherman, S., Fogel, E., Madura, J. A, & Lehman, G. A. Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome: imaging findings and therapeutic implications in 26 surgically corrected patients. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 2003; 27(4), 577–582. doi: 10.1097/00004728-200307000-00023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Neoptolemos, J. P., London, N. J., & Carr-Locke, D. L. Assessment of main pancreatic duct integrity by endoscopic retrograde pancreatography in patients with acute pancreatitis. The British Journal of Surgery 1993; 80(1), 94–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Uomo, G., Molino, D., Visconti, M., Ragozzino, A., Manes, G., & Rabitti, P. G. The incidence of main pancreatic duct disruption in severe biliary pancreatitis. American Journal of Surgery 1998; 176(1), 49–52. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00097-X

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Irani, S., Gluck, M., Ross, A., Gan, S. I., Crane, R., Brandabur, J. J., Hauptmann, E., Fotoohi, M., & Kozarek, R. A. Resolving external pancreatic fistulas in patients with disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome: Using rendezvous techniques to avoid surgery (with video). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.05.006

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lawrence, C., Howell, D. A., Stefan, A. M., Conklin, D. E., Lukens, F. J., Martin, R. F., Landes, A., & Benz, B. Disconnected pancreatic tail syndrome: potential for endoscopic therapy and results of long-term follow-up. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2008; 67(4), 673–679. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.07.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Varadarajulu, S., Rana, S. S., & Bhasin, D. K. Endoscopic Therapy for Pancreatic Duct Leaks and Disruptions. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2013.06.008

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fischer, T. D., Gutman, D. S., Hughes, S. J., Trevino, J. G., & Behrns, K. E. Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome: Disease classification and management strategies. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2014; 219(4), 704–712. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bassi, C., Butturini, G., Salvia, R., Contro, C., Valerio, A., Falconi, M., & Pederzoli, P. A single-institution experience with fistulojejunostomy for external pancreatic fistulas. American Journal of Surgery 2000; 179(3), 203–206. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00291-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Murage, K. P., Ball, C. G., Zyromski, N. J., Nakeeb, A., Ocampo, C., Sandrasegaran, K., & Howard, T. J. Clinical framework to guide operative decision making in disconnected left pancreatic remnant (DLPR) following acute or chronic pancreatitis. Surgery 2010; 148(4), 847–857. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nair, R. R., Lowy, A. M., McIntyre, B., Sussman, J. J., Matthews, J. B., & Ahmad, S. A. Fistulojejunostomy for the management of refractory pancreatic fistula. Surgery 2007; 142(4), 636–642. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2007.07.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pearson, E. G., Scaife, C. L., Mulvihill, S. J., & Glasgow, R. E. Roux-en-Y drainage of a pancreatic fistula for disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome after acute necrotizing pancreatitis. HPB 2012; 14(1), 26–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00397.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nadkarni, N. A., Kotwal, V., Sarr, M. G., & Vege, S. S. Disconnected Pancreatic Duct Syndrome. Pancreas 2015; 2, 16–22. doi: 10.1016/j.cireng.2013.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pelaez-Luna, M., Vege, S. S., Petersen, B. T., Chari, S. T., Clain, J. E., Levy, M. J., Pearson, R.K., Topazian, M.D., Farnell, M.B., Kendrick, M.L., & Baron, T. H. Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome in severe acute pancreatitis: clinical and imaging characteristics and outcomes in a cohort of 31 cases. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2008; 68(1), 91–97. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.11.041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ramia, J. M., Fabregat, J., Perez-Miranda, M., & Figueras, J. Disconnected panreatic duct syndrome. Cirugia Espanola 2014; 92(1), 4–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2013.02.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sandrasegaran, K., Tann, M., Jennings, S. G., Maglinte, D. D., Peter, S. D., Sherman, S., & Howard, T. J. Disconnection of the pancreatic duct: an important but overlooked complication of severe acute pancreatitis. Radiographics: A Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 2007; 27(5), 1389–1400. doi: 10.1148/rg.275065163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Solanki, R., Koganti, S. B., Bheerappa, N., & Sastry, R. A. Disconnected duct syndrome: Refractory inflammatory external pancreatic fistula following percutaneous drainage of an infected peripancreatic fluid collection. A case report and review of the literature. Journal of the Pancreas 2011; 12(2), 177–180.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kozarek, R. A., Ball, T. J., Patterson, D. J., Raltz, S. L., Traverso, L. W., Ryan, J. A., & Thirlby, R. C. Transpapillary stenting for pancreaticocutaneous fistulas. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 1997; 1(4), 357–361.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Howard, T. J., Stonerock, C. E., Sarkar, J., Lehman, G. A., Sherman, S., Wiebke, E. A., Madura, J.A., & Broadie, T. A. Contemporary treatment strategies for external pancreatic fistulas. Surgery 1998; 124(4), 627–633. doi: 10.1067/msy.1998.91267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stahl, C. C., Moulton, J., Vu, D., Ristagno, R., Choe, K., Sussman, J. J., Shah S. A., Ahmad S. A., & Abbott, D. E. Routine use of U-tube drainage for necrotizing pancreatitis: A step toward less morbidity and resource utilization. Surgery 2015; 158(4), 919–928. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.07.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. da Costa, D. W., Boerma, D., van Santvoort, H. C., Horvath, K. D., Werner, J., Carter, C. R., Bollen T. L., Gooszen H. G., Besselink M. G., & Bakker, O. J. Staged multidisciplinary step-up management for necrotizing pancreatitis. The British Journal of Surgery 2014; 101(1), e65–79. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Trikudanathan, G., Arain, M., Attam, R., & Freeman, M. L. Interventions for necrotizing pancreatitis: an overview of current approaches. Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2013; 7(5), 463–475. JOUR. doi: 10.1586/17474124.2013.811055

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Freeman, M. L., Werner, J., van Santvoort, H. C., Baron, T. H., Besselink, M. G., Windsor, J. A., Horvath K. D., VanSonnenberg E., Bollen T. L., Vege, S. S. Interventions for necrotizing pancreatitis: summary of a multidisciplinary consensus conference. Pancreas 2012; 41(8), 1176–94. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318269c660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lahey FH, Lium R. Cure of pancreatic fistula by pancreati- cojejunostomy: report of a case with review of the literature. Surgery Gynecology Obstetrics 1937;64:78–81.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Author Contributions

All persons who meet authorship criteria are listed as authors, and all authors certify that they have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for the content, including participation in the concept, design, analysis, writing, or revision of the manuscript. Furthermore, each author certifies that this material or similar material has not been and will not be submitted to or published in any other publication before its appearance in the Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

Conception and design of study: VK Dhar, JM Sutton, GC Wilson, DE Abbott, and SA Ahmad

Acquisition of data: VK Dhar, JM Sutton, BT Xia, NC Levinsky, GC Wilson, M Smith, KA Choe, J Moulton, D Vu, and R Ristagno

Analysis and/or interpretation of data: VK Dhar, JM Sutton, JJ Sussman, MJ Edwards, DE Abbott, and SA Ahmad

Drafting the manuscript: VK Dhar, JM Sutton, DE Abbott, and SA Ahmad

Revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content: VK Dhar, JM Sutton, BT Xia, NC Levinsky, GC Wilson, M Smith, KA Choe, J Moulton, D Vu, R Ristagno, JJ Sussman, MJ Edwards, DE Abbott, and SA Ahmad

Final approval of the version of the manuscript to be published: VK Dhar, JM Sutton, BT Xia, NC Levinsky, GC Wilson, M Smith, KA Choe, J Moulton, D Vu, R Ristagno, JJ Sussman, MJ Edwards, DE Abbott, and SA Ahmad

Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work: VK Dhar, JM Sutton, BT Xia, NC Levinsky, GC Wilson, M Smith, KA Choe, J Moulton, D Vu, R Ristagno, JJ Sussman, MJ Edwards, DE Abbott, and SA Ahmad

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Syed A. Ahmad.

Ethics declarations

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained prior to initiation of the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dhar, V.K., Sutton, J.M., Xia, B.T. et al. Fistulojejunostomy Versus Distal Pancreatectomy for the Management of the Disconnected Pancreas Remnant Following Necrotizing Pancreatitis. J Gastrointest Surg 21, 1121–1127 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3419-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3419-9

Keywords

Navigation