Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Returns to Operating Room After Colon and Rectal Surgery in a Tertiary Care Academic Medical Center: a Valid Measure of Surgical Quality?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Introduction

Returns to the operating room (ROR) have been suggested as a marker of surgical quality. Increasingly, quality and value metrics are utilized for reimbursement as well as public reporting to inform health care consumers. We sought to understand the etiology of ROR and assess the validity of simple ROR as a quality metric.

Methods

This was a single referral center retrospective review of all colon and rectal operations between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014. Surgical Systems Nurse + was constructed and validated at our institution for classifying ROR as either an unplanned return to the OR, planned return due to complications, planned staged return, or an unrelated return. The primary outcome was the classification of ROR and total number of ROR within 30 days.

Results

Of the 2389 colorectal patients who underwent surgery between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014; 214 returned to the operating room within 30 days (9.0%). Among the 214 patients, there were a total of 232 ROR with an average of 1.1 ROR per patient (range 1–4); 90 (38.8%) were unplanned ROR, 49 (21.1%) were planned returns due to complications, 92 (39.7%) were planned staged returns, and 1 (0.4%) were unrelated ROR. The most common reason for an unplanned ROR was an anastomotic leak (n = 21; 9.1%). Overall, unplanned reoperations were rare events (n = 90/2389; 3.8%), largely comprised of patients experiencing an anastomotic abscess or leak (n=21/2389; 0.9%).

Conclusions

In a high volume and complexity academic colon and rectal surgery practice, RORs within 30 days occurred after 10.4% of cases. Unplanned ROR were relatively rare and most commonly associated with an anastomotic leak. Since the majority of ROR were planned-staged returns, overall rate of ROR should be questioned as a metric of surgical quality. Perhaps, the anastomotic leak rate may be a better metric to monitor for quality improvement efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Birkmeyer, J.D., et al., Is unplanned return to the operating room a useful quality indicator in general surgery? Arch Surg, 2001. 136(4): p. 405–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kroon, H.M., P.J. Breslau, and J.W. Lardenoye, Can the incidence of unplanned reoperations be used as an indicator of quality of care in surgery? Am J Med Qual, 2007. 22(3): p. 198–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Guevara, O.A., J.A. Rubio-Romero, and A.I. Ruiz-Parra, Unplanned reoperations: is emergency surgery a risk factor? A cohort study. J Surg Res, 2013. 182(1): p. 11–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ricciardi, R., et al., How often do patients return to the operating room after colorectal resections? Colorectal Dis, 2012. 14(4): p. 515–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin Y., et al., An institutional analysis of unplanned return to the operating room to identify areas of quality improvement. The American Journal of Surgery. 2016. in press.

  6. Farquhar, M., AHRQ Quality Indicators, in Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses, R.G. Hughes, Editor. 2008: Rockville (MD).

  7. Hyman, N., et al., Anastomotic leaks after intestinal anastomosis: it’s later than you think. Ann Surg, 2007. 245(2): p. 254–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors were involved in study design, data analysis, drafting, and final approval of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy L. Lightner.

Ethics declarations

Sources of Funding

None.

Additional information

Poster presentation at ASCRS May 2016, Los Angeles, CA

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lightner, A.L., Glasgow, A.E., Habermann, E.B. et al. Returns to Operating Room After Colon and Rectal Surgery in a Tertiary Care Academic Medical Center: a Valid Measure of Surgical Quality?. J Gastrointest Surg 21, 1048–1054 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3403-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3403-4

Keywords

Navigation