Surgeon Volume Correlates with Reduced Mortality and Improved Quality in the Surgical Management of Diverticulitis
- 217 Downloads
Volume has been shown to be an important determinant of quality and cost outcomes.
We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent surgery for diverticulitis using the University HealthSystem Consortium database from 2008–2012. Outcomes evaluated included minimally invasive approach, stoma creation, intensive-care admission, post-operative complications, length of stay, and total direct hospital costs by surgeon volume. Surgeon volume was categorized into four categories by mean annual volumes: very-high (VHVS) (>31), high (HVS) (13–31), medium (MVS) (6–12), and low (LVS) (≤5).
A total of 19,212 patients with a mean age of 59 years, 54 % female makeup, and 55 % rate of private insurance were included. Similar to the unadjusted analysis, multivariable analysis revealed decreasing odds of stoma creation, complications, ICU admission, reoperation, readmission, and inpatient mortality with increasing surgeon volume. Additionally, compared with LVS, a higher surgeon volume was associated with higher rates of the minimally invasive approach. Median length of stay and costs were also notably lower with increasing surgeon volume.
Quality and the use of minimally invasive technique are tightly associated with surgeon volume. Further studies are necessary to validate the direct association of volume with outcomes in surgery for diverticulitis.
KeywordsDiverticulitis Laparoscopy Volume Quality Stoma
- 1.Weizman AV, Nguyen GC. Diverticular disease: epidemiology and management. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2011;25:385.Google Scholar
- 7.Letarte F, Hallet J, Drolet S, Charles Gregoire R, Bouchard A, Gagne JP, Thibault C, Bouchard P. Laparoscopic emergency surgery for diverticular disease that failed medical treatment: a valuable option? Results of a retrospective comparative cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:1395–1402.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Letarte F, Hallet J, Drolet S, Boulanger-Gobeil C, Bouchard A, Gregoire RC, Gagne JP, Thibault C, Bouchard P. Laparoscopic versus open colonic resection for complicated diverticular disease in the emergency setting: a safe choice? A retrospective comparative cohort study. Am J Surg. 2014Google Scholar
- 10.Collins D, Winter DC. Laparoscopy in diverticular disease: controversies. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;28:175–182.Google Scholar
- 13.Turley RS, Barbas AS, Lidsky ME, Mantyh CR, Migaly J, Scarborough JE. Laparoscopic versus open Hartmann procedure for the emergency treatment of diverticulitis: a propensity-matched analysis. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 2013;56:72–82.Google Scholar
- 15.Fuchs HF, Broderick RC, Harnsberger CR, Chang DC, Mclemore EC, Ramamoorthy S, Horgan S. Variation of outcome and charges in operative management for diverticulitis. Surg Endosc. 2014Google Scholar
- 16.Damle RN, Cherng NB, Flahive JM, Davids JS, Maykel JA, Sturrock PR, Sweeney WB, Alavi K. Clinical and Financial Impact of Hospital Readmissions After Colorectal Resection: Predictors, Outcomes, and Costs. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 2014;57:1421–1429.Google Scholar
- 17.Damle RN, Macomber CW, Flahive JM, Davids JS, Sweeney WB, Sturrock PR, Maykel JA, Santry HP, Alavi K. Surgeon volume and elective resection for colon cancer: An analysis of outcomes and use of laparoscopy. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2014;218:1223–1230.Google Scholar
- 22.Liu CJ, Chou YJ, Teng CJ, Lin CC, Lee YT, Hu YW, Yeh CM, Chen TJ, Huang N. Association of surgeon volume and hospital volume with the outcome of patients receiving definitive surgery for colorectal cancer: A nationwide population-based study. Cancer. 2015Google Scholar
- 30.Oberkofler CE, Rickenbacher A, Raptis DA, Lehmann K, Villiger P, Buchli C, Grieder F, Gelpke H, Decurtins M, Tempia-Caliera AA, Demartines N, Hahnloser D, Clavien PA, Breitenstein S. A multicenter randomized clinical trial of primary anastomosis or Hartmann’s procedure for perforated left colonic diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis. Ann Surg. 2012;256:819–26; discussion 826.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar