Abstract
Background and aims
Many advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases can be successfully downstaged into the Milan criteria; however, immediate radical therapy cannot be applied to all such patients for various reasons. Of the patients who are not eligible for immediate radical therapy, some accept repeated downstaging therapies and some undergo persistent observation. The aim of the present study was to compare long-term survival between these two groups of patients.
Patients and Methods
Between August 2003 and October 2008, 156 HCC patients successfully received downstaging therapy resulting in compliance with the Milan criteria. Of those, 98 cases accepted radical therapies, including liver transplantation (LT), resection, or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (group 1), and 58 cases underwent repeated transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) or persistent observation (group 2). The baseline characteristics, demographic data, downstaging protocol, and information on long-term outcomes were collected and compared.
Results
No significant differences were observed in the patient demographic data, downstaging protocols, or tumor characteristics between the two groups. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 92.9, 82.7, and 78.6 %, respectively, in group 1, whereas these rates were 82.8, 65.5, and 48.3 %, respectively, in group 2 (P = 0.046). Among the 58 patients in group 2, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 92.3, 65.4, and 46.2 %, respectively, in the repeated TACE group, and 81.3, 65.6, and 50 %, respectively, in the persistent observation group (P = 0.783).
Conclusion
Immediate radical therapy should be the first choice for advanced HCC patients who undergo successful TACE, and repeated TACE is unnecessary.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- LT:
-
Liver transplantation
- TACE:
-
Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization
- HBV:
-
Hepatitis B virus
- HCC:
-
Hepatocellular carcinoma
- RFA:
-
Radiofrequency ablation
- HCV:
-
Hepatitis C virus
- AFP:
-
Alpha-fetoprotein
- EI:
-
Ethanol injection
- LDLT:
-
Living-donor liver transplantation
- DDLT:
-
Deceased-donor liver transplantation
References
Nordenstedt H, White DL, EI-Serag HB. The changing pattern of epidemiology in hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Liver Dis. 2010;42 Suppl 3:S206–14
Kin JM, Kwon CH, Joh JW, et al. Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma beyond Milan criteria: should we perform transarterial chemoembolization or liver transplantation? Transplant Proc. 2010;42(3):821–4
Lo CM, Ngan H, Tso WK, et al. Randomized controlled trail of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2002;35:1164–71
Llovet JM, Real MI, Montana X, Barcelona Liver Cancer Group, et al. Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359;1734–9
Yao FY, Kerlan Jr RK, Hirose R, et al. Excellent outcome following down-staging of hepatocellular carcinoma prior to liver transplantation: an intention-to-treat analysis. Hepatology. 2008;48:819–27
Gordon-Weeks AN, Snaith A, Petrinic T, et al. Systematic review of outcome of downstaging hepatocellular cancer before liver transplantation in patients outside the Milan criteria. Br J Surg. 2011;98(9):1201–8
Herrero JI, Sangro B, Pardo F, et al. Liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma across Milan criteria. Liver Transpl. 2008;14:272–8
Yao FY, Kinkhabwala M, LaBerge JM, et al. The impact of pre-operative loco-regional therapy on outcome after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Transplant. 2005;5(Pt1):795–804
Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2005;42:1208–36
Silva M, Moya A, Berenguer M, et al. Expanded criteria for liver transplantation in patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl. 14:1449–60
Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:693–9
Chapman WC, Majella Doyle MB, et al. Outcomes of neoadjuvant transarterial chemoembolization to downstage hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation. Ann Surg. 2008;248(4):617–25
Jiang L, Yan L, Li B, et al. Prophylaxis against hepatitis B recurrence posttransplantation using lamivudine and individualized low-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin. Am J Transplant. 2010;10(8):1861–9
Radionics TM, Burlington MA, Lei JY, Yan LN, Wang WT. Transplantation vs resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with compensated liver function after downstaging therapy. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(27):4400–8
Huang J, Yan L, Cheng Z, Wu H, Du L, Wang J, Xu Y, Zeng Y. A randomized trial comparing radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection for HCC confirming to the Milan criteria. Ann Surg. 2010;252(6):903–12
Lei J, Wang W, Yan L. Surgical resection versus open-approach radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinomas within Milan criteria after successful transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 17(10):1752–9
Herber S, Schneider J, Brecher B, et al. TACE: therapy of the HCC before liver transplantation-experiences. Rofo. 2005;177(5):681–90
Lei J, Yan L. Comparison between living donor liver transplantation recipients who me the Milan and UCSF criteria after successful downstaging therapies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(11):2120–5
Lei J, Wang W, Yan L. Downstaging advanced hepatocellular carcinoma to the Milan criteria may provide a comparable outcome to conventional Milan criteria. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(8):1440–6
Yao FY, Xiao L, Bass NM, et al. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: validation of the UCSF-expanded criteria based on preoperative imaging. Am J Transplant. 2007;7(11):2587–96
Lei JY, Wang WT, Yan LN. Up-to-seven criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma liver transplantation: a single center analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(36):6077–83
Zheng SS, Xu X, Wu J, et al. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Hangzhou experiences. Transplantation. 2008;85(12):1726–32
Lei JY, Yan LN, Wang WT. Transplantation vs resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with compensated liver function after downstaging therapy. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(27):4400–8
Vitale A, D’Amico F, Frigo AC, et al. Response to therapy as a criterion awarding priority to patients with hepatocellular carcinoma awaiting liver transplantation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(9):2290–302
Bargellini I, Bozzi E, Campani D, et al. Modified RECIST to assess tumor response after transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma: CT-pathologic correlation in 178 liver explants. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82(5):e212–8
Toso C, Menth G, Kneteman NM, Majno P. The place of downstaging for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2010;52(6):930–6
Otto G, Schuchmann M, Hoppe-Lotichius M, et al. How to decide about liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: size and number of lesions or response to TACE. J Hepatol. 2013;59(2):279–84
Lin S, Hoffmann K, Schemmer P. Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review. Liver Cancer. 2012;1(3–4):144–58
Teizi E, Golfieri R, Piscaglia F, et al. Response rate and clinical outcome of HCC after first and repeated C TACE performed “on demand”. J Hepatol. 2012;57(6):1258–67
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the “The Chinese Liver Transplant Registry” for providing part of the data.
Conflict of interest
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Jiang L and Lei JY contributed equally to this study and are co-first authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, L., Lei, J.Y., Wang, W.T. et al. Immediate Radical Therapy or Conservative Treatments When Meeting the Milan Criteria for Advanced HCC Patients After Successful TACE. J Gastrointest Surg 18, 1125–1130 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2508-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2508-2