Skip to main content
Log in

What Is the Effect of Stoma Construction on Surgical Site Infection After Colorectal Surgery?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of stoma creation on deep and superficial surgical site infections after an index colorectal surgical procedure.

Methods

We designed a retrospective cohort study from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. We evaluated all patients who underwent colorectal surgery procedures from January 2005 to December 2009 with or without creation of a stoma and sought to identify the effect of stoma creation on deep and superficial surgical site infections.

Results

A total of 79,775 patients underwent colorectal procedures (laparoscopic 30.7 %, open 69.3 %), while 8,113 patients developed a surgical site infection (10.2 %). The univariate analysis revealed that surgical site infections were much more common in patients with a stoma compared to those with no stoma (11.8 % vs. 9.5 %, p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, stoma construction during the index colorectal procedure (OR 1.3, CI 1.2 to 1.4), ASA class ≥2, smoking, and abnormal body mass index were associated with surgical site infection.

Conclusions

The construction of a stoma with colorectal procedures is associated with a higher risk of surgical site infection. Although the stoma effect on surgical site infection is attenuated with laparoscopic techniques, the association remained statistically significant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/acute-care-hospital/ssi/index.html. Accessed 16 August 2013.

  2. Culver DH, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Banerjee SN, Edwards JR, Tolson JS, Henderson TS, et al. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med 1991;91:152S–157S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. S.I. Berrios-Torres. Surgical Site Infections Toolkit. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at: cdc.gov/HAI/pdfs/toolkits/SSI_toolkit021710SIBT_revised.pdf Accessed August 16, 2013.

  4. Wick EC, Hobson DB, Bennett JL, Demski R, Maragakis L, Gearhart SL, Efron J, Berenholtz SM, Makary MA. Implementation of a surgical comprehensive unit-based safety program to reduce surgical site infections. J Am Coll Surg 2012;215:193–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bratzler DW. The Surgical Infection Prevention and Surgical Care Improvement Projects: promises and pitfalls. Am Surg 2006;72:1010–1016.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hawn MT. Surgical Care Improvement: Should Performance Measures Have Performance Measures. JAMA 2010;303:2527–2528.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Dimick JB, Richards KE, Raval MV, Fleisher LA, Hall BL, Ko CY. Association of surgical care improvement project infection-related process measure compliance with risk-adjusted outcomes: implications for quality measurement. J Am Coll Surg 2010;211:705–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. ACS NSQIP. Available at: www.acsnsqip.org/main/programspecs/program_data_collection.jsp. Accessed November 14, 2010.

  9. Beyond the HIPAA Privacy Rule: Enhancing Privacy, Improving Health Through Research. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Health Research and the Privacy of Health Information: The HIPAA Privacy Rule; Nass SJ, Levit LA, Gostin LO, editors. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2009.

  10. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, et al.: The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: The first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 1998;228:491–507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rowell KS, Turrentine FE, Hutter MM, et al. Use of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data as a catalyst for quality improvement. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204:1293–1300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. ACS NSQIP data: participant use data file. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Web site. Available at: www.acsnsqip.org/puf/PufRequestHomepage.aspx. Accessed May 20, 2010.

  13. Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY. Comparison of hospital performance in nonemergency versus emergency colorectal operations at 142 hospitals. J Am Coll Surg 2010;210:155–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. American College of Surgeons. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Operations Manual. Available at: www.registry.acsnsqip.org/codingInstructions.html. Accessed Nov 22, 2010.

  15. Altemeier WA, Culbertson WR, Hummel RP. Surgical considerations of endogenous infections-sources, types, and methods of control. Surg Clin North Am 1968;48:227–240.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cone MM, Herzig DO, Diggs BS, Rea JD, Hardiman KM, Lu KC. Effect of surgical approach on 30-day mortality and morbidity after elective colectomy: a NSQIP study. J Gastrointest Surg 2012;16:1212–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Aimaq R, Akopian G, Kaufman HS. Surgical site infection rates in laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery. Am Surg 2011;77:1290–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. How-to-Guide: Prevent Surgical Site Infections. Cambridge, MA. Available at www.ihi.org. Accessed 21 August 2013.

  19. Edwards JP, Ho AL, Tee MC, Dixon E, Ball CG. Wound protectors reduce surgical site infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 2012;256:53–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim EK, Sheetz KH, Bonn J, Deroo S, Lee C, Stein I, Zarinsefat A, Cai S, Campbell DA Jr, Englesbe MJ. A Statewide Colectomy Experience: The Role of Full Bowel Preparation in Preventing Surgical Site Infection. Ann Surg. 2013 Aug 23. [Epub ahead of print].

  21. Güenaga KF, Matos D, Wille-Jørgensen P. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(9):CD001544.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Financial Disclosures

None.

Disclaimer

The ACS-NSQIP and the hospitals participating in the ACS-NSQIP are the source of the data used herein; they have not verified and are not responsible for the statistical validity of the data analysis or the conclusions derived by the authors. The study has been approved by all authors in the present format.

Funding

No funding support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rocco Ricciardi.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Table S1

(DOC 85 kb)

Table S2

(DOC 75 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ricciardi, R., Roberts, P.L., Hall, J.F. et al. What Is the Effect of Stoma Construction on Surgical Site Infection After Colorectal Surgery?. J Gastrointest Surg 18, 789–795 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2439-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2439-3

Keywords

Navigation