Skip to main content
Log in

Single-site Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Provides Similar Lengths of Hospital Stay and Similar Costs Compared with Standard Laparoscopy: Results of a Retrospective Cohort Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

The present study sought to compare the length of stay (LOS) and hospital costs for elective single-site (SSL) and standard laparoscopic (SDL) colorectal resections performed at a tertiary referral center.

Methods

An IRB-approved, retrospective cohort study of all elective SDL and SSL colorectal resections performed from 2008 to 2012 was undertaken. Patient charges and inflation adjusted hospital costs (US dollars) were compared with costs subcategorized by operating room expense, room and board, and pharmacy and radiology utilization.

Results

A total of 149 SDL and 111 SSL cases were identified. Compared with SSL, SDL surgeries were associated with longer median operative times (SSL: 153 min vs. SDL: 189 min, p = 0.001); however, median operating room costs were similar (p > 0.05). Median postoperative LOS was similar for both groups (SSL: 3 days; SDL: 4 days; p > 0.05). There was no difference between SSL and SDL with respect to either total patient charges (SSL: $34,847 vs. SDL: $38,306; p > 0.05) or hospital costs (SSL: $13,051vs. SDL: $12,703; p > 0.05). Median costs during readmission were lower for SSL patients (SSL: $3,625 vs. SDL: $6,203, p = 0.04).

Conclusions

SSL provides similar LOS as well as similar costs to both patients and hospitals compared with SDL, making it a cost-feasible alternative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kennedy RH, Francis A, Dutton S, Love S, Pearson S, Blazeby JM, Quirke P, Franks PJ, Kerr DJ. EnROL: a multicentre randomised trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme. BMC Cancer 2012;12:181.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dasari BV, McKay D, Gardiner K. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for small bowel Crohn's disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;1:CD006956

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:44-52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahmed Ali U, Keus F, Heikens JT, Bemelman WA, Berdah SV, Goozen HG, van Laarhoven CJ. Open versus laparoscopic (assisted) ileo pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;1:CD006267.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2005;6:477-484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Waters JA, Rapp BM, Guzman MJ, Jester AL, Selzer DJ, Robb BW, Johansen BJ, Tsai BM, Maun DC, George W. Single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: the first 100 resections. Dis Colon Rectum 2012;55:134-139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stewart DB, Messaris E. Outcomes for consecutive patients undergoing single-site laparoscopic colorectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2012;16:849-856.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Papaconstantinou HT, Sharp N, Thomas JS. Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: a case-matched comparison with standard laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic techniques. J Am Coll Surg 2011;213:72-80 (discussion 80-72).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McNally ME, Todd Moore B, Brown KM. Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for malignant disease. Surg Endosc 2011;25:3559-3565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim SJ, Ryu GO, Choi BJ, Kim JG, Lee, KJ, Lee SC, Oh ST. The short-term outcomes of conventional and single-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 2011;254:933-940.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Katsuno G, Fukunaga M, Nagakari K, Yoshikawa S, Ouchi M, Hirasaki Y. Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: early experience with 31 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 2011;54:705-710.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gash KJ, Goede AC, Kaldowski B, Vestweber B, Dixon AR. Single incision laparoscopic (SILS) restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Surg Endosc 2011;25:3877-3880.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cianchi F, Qirici E, Trallori G, Mallardi B, Badii B, Perigli G. Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: technical aspects and short-term results. Updates Surg 2012;64:19-23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Adair J, Gromski MA, Nagle D. Single-incision laparoscopic sigmoidectomy and rectopexy case series. Am J Surg 2011;202:243-245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. O'Connor DJ, Feinberg E, Jang J, Vemulapalli P, Camacho D. Single-incision laparoscopic-assisted right colon resection for cancer. JSLS 2010;14:558-560.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Makino T, Milsom JW, Lee SW. Feasibility and safety of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: a systematic review. Ann Surg 2012;255:667-676.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vasilakis V, Clark CE, Liasis L, Papaconstantinou HT. Noncosmetic benefits of single-incision laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: a case-matched comparison with multiport laparoscopic technique. J Surg Res 2012;180:201-207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kanakala V, Borowski DW, Agarwal AK, Tabaqchali MA, Garg DK, Gill TS. Comparative study of safety and outcomes of single-port access versus conventional laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 2012;16:423-428.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hemandas AK, Abdelrahman T, Flashman KG, Skull AJ, Senapati A, O'Leary DP, Parvaiz A. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery produces better outcomes for high risk cancer patients compared to open surgery. Ann Surg 2010;252:84-89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kiran RP, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Steel M, Garafalo T, Fazio VW. Outcomes and prediction of hospital readmission after intestinal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2004;198:877-883.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schneider EB, Hyder O, Brooke BS, Efron J, Cameron JL, Edil BH, Schulick RD, Choti MA, Wolfgang CL, Pawlik TM. Patient readmission and mortality after colorectal surgery for colon cancer: impact of length of stay relative to other clinical factors. J Am Coll Surg 2012;214:390-398 (discussion 398-399).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

David B. Stewart received honoraria from Ethicon Endosurgery for service as faculty at laparoscopic courses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David B. Stewart.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stewart, D.B., Berg, A. & Messaris, E. Single-site Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Provides Similar Lengths of Hospital Stay and Similar Costs Compared with Standard Laparoscopy: Results of a Retrospective Cohort Study. J Gastrointest Surg 18, 774–781 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2438-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2438-4

Keywords

Navigation