Skip to main content
Log in

2013 SSAT Presidential Address: Peer Review

  • 2013 SSAT Presidential Address
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

An Erratum to this article was published on 04 February 2014

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Dirk L. Henry Oldenburg: The First Science-Journal Editor. CBE Views. 1999; 22: 203.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kronick DA. Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism. JAMA. 1990; 263: 1321–1322. PMID: 2406469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ioannidis JP. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005; 2: 696–701. PMID: 16060722

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ioannidis JP. Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research. JAMA 2005;294:218–28. PMID: 16014596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Poynard T, Munteanu M, Ratziu V, Benhamou Y, Di Martino V, Taieb J, Opolon P. Truth survival in clinical research: an evidence-based requiem? Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:888–95. PMID: 12069563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Booth CC. Medical communication: the old and the new. The development of medical journals in Britain. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982; 285: 105–108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Horrobin DF. The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation. JAMA. 1990; 263: 1438–1441. PMID: 2304222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Benos DJ, Bashari E, Chaves JM, Gaggar A, Kapoor N, LaFrane M, Mans R, Mayhew D, McGowan S, Polter A, Qadri Y, Sarfae S, Schultz K, Splittgerber R, Stephenson J, Tower C, Walton RG, Zotov A. The ups and downs of peer review. Adv Physiol Educ 2007; 31: 145–152.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marshall BM. Helicobacter pylori: past, present and future. Keio J Med. 2003;52:80–5 PMID: 12862358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dwan K, Altman DG, Arnaiz JA, Bloom J, Chan A-W, Cronin E, Decullier E, Easterbrook PJ, von Elm E, Gamble C, Gherso D, Ioannidis JPA, Simes J, Williamson PR. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias. PLoS ONE 2008; 3: e3081. PMID: 18769481

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tatsioni A, Bonitsis NG, Ioannidis JP. Persistence of contradicted claims in the literature. JAMA 2007;298(21):2517–26. PMID: 18056905

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jefferson T, Alderson P, Wager E, Davidoff F. Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review. JAMA 2002; 287: 2784–2786.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Eisen M (2011). Peer Review is F***ed Up—Let’s Fix It. http://www.michaeleisen.org/blog/?p=694 Accessed 05/05/13

  14. Björk B-C, Solomon D. Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact. BMC Medicine. 2012; 10:73. PMID: 22805105

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Swartz A. Guerilla Open Access Manifesto http://cryptome.org/2013/01/swartz-open-access.htm accessed 03/14/13

  16. Sanchez Z. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature 2012; 489: 179

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey B. Matthews.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matthews, J.B. 2013 SSAT Presidential Address: Peer Review. J Gastrointest Surg 18, 1–6 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2342-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2342-y

Keywords

Navigation