Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Letter to the Editor, Reply to “Commentary on Meta-analysis of Prospective Randomized Studies Comparing Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) and Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (CMLC)” by Pisanu et al. (J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16:1790–1801)

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allemann P, Schafer M, Demartines N. Critical appraisal of single port access cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2010; 97:1476–1480.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Marks JM, Phillips MS, Tacchino R, Roberts K, Onders R, Denoto G, Gecelter G, Rubach E, Rivas H, Islam A, Soper N, Paraskeva P, Rosemurgy A, Ross S, Shah S. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs. single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 216:1037–1047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Clinica Chirurgica, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy

    Adolfo Pisanu, Isabella Reccia, Giulia Porceddu & Alessandro Uccheddu

  2. Clinica Chirurgica, University of Cagliari, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Presidio Policlinico di Monserrato, Blocco G SS 554 km 4,500, 09042, Monserrato, CA, Italy

    Adolfo Pisanu

Authors
  1. Adolfo Pisanu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Isabella Reccia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Giulia Porceddu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alessandro Uccheddu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adolfo Pisanu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pisanu, A., Reccia, I., Porceddu, G. et al. Letter to the Editor, Reply to “Commentary on Meta-analysis of Prospective Randomized Studies Comparing Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) and Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (CMLC)” by Pisanu et al. (J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16:1790–1801). J Gastrointest Surg 17, 2029–2030 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2306-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2306-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation