Skip to main content
Log in

Hybrid Trans-thoracic Esophagectomy with Side-to-Side Stapled Intra-thoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis for Esophageal Cancer

  • How I do it
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Esophagectomy is the primary treatment modality for non-metastatic esophageal cancer. A trans-thoracic approach is used in most centers in the United States. Anastomotic complications, such as leakage and stricture, are associated with worse short-term and long-term outcomes. Recent data suggest that a side-to-side mechanical intra-thoracic esophagogastric anastomosis is associated with a reduced rate of anastomotic leaks and strictures. This article describes the technique of trans-thoracic hybrid esophagectomy with side-to-side intra-thoracic esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ. Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2241-2252.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boshier PR, Anderson O, Hanna GB. Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for the treatment of esophagogastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2011;254:894-906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, Levy RM, Keeley S, Shende M, Christie NA, Weksler B, Landreneau RJ, Abbas G, Schuchert MJ, Nason KS. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg. 2012;256:95-103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nagpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A, Yakoub D, James D, Ashrafian H, Darzi A, Moorthy K, Athanasiou T. Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1621-1629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Biere SSAY, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR, Gisbertz SS, Klinkenbijl JHG, Hollmann MW, de Lange ESM, Bonjer HJ, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2012;379:1887-1892.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Collard JM, Romagnoli R, Goncette L, Otte JB, Kestens PJ. Terminalized semimechanical side-to-side suture technique for cervical esophagogastrostomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:814-817.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Müller JM, Erasmi H, Stelzner M, Zieren U, Pichlmaier H. Surgical therapy of oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1990;77:845-857.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Patil PK, Patel SG, Mistry RC, Deshpande RK, Desai PB. Cancer of the esophagus: esophagogastric anastomotic leak—a retrospective study of predisposing factors. J Surg Oncol. 1992;49:163-167.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Urschel JD. Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review. Am J Surg. 1995;169:634-640.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Martin LW, Swisher SG, Hofstetter W, Correa AM, Mehran RJ, Rice DC, Vaporciyan AA, Walsh GL, Roth JA. Intrathoracic leaks following esophagectomy are no longer associated with increased mortality. Ann Surg. 2005;242(3):392-399.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cense HA, Lagarde SM, de Jong K, Omloo JM, Busch OR, Henny ChP, van Lanschot JJ. Association of no epidural anesthesia with postoperative morbidity and mortality after transthoracic esophageal cancer resection. J Am Coll Surg 2006;202:395-400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gasper WJ, Glidden DV, Jin C, Way LW, Patti MG. Has recognition of the relationship between mortality rates and hospital volume for major cancer surgery in California made a difference?: a follow-up analysis of another decade. Ann Surg. 2009;250:472-483.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Briez N, Piessen G, Torres F, Lebuffe G, Triboulet JP, Mariette C. Effects of hybrid minimally invasive oesophagectomy on major postoperative pulmonary complications. Br J Surg. 2012;99:1547-1553.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vigneswaran WT, Trastek VF, Pairolero PC, Deschamps C, Daly RC, Allen MS. Transhiatal esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56:838-844.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refiniments. Ann Surg 1999;230:392-403.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chang AC, Orringer MB. Management of the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic strict. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;19:66-71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim RH, Takabe K. Methods of esophagogastric anastomoses following esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review. J Surg Oncol 2010;101:527-533.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119:277-288.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Chang AC, Lee J, Pickens A, Lau CL. Two thousand transhiatal esophagectomies: changing trends, lessons learned. Ann Surg. 2007;246:363-372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cooke DT, Lin GC, Lau CL, Zhang L, Si MS, Lee J, Chang AC, Pickens A, Orringer MB. Analysis of cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leaks after transhiatal esophagectomy: risk factors, presentation, and detection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:177-184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ercan S, Rice TW, Murthy SC, Rybicki LA, Blackstone EH. Does esophagogastric anastomotic technique influence the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129:623-631.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Blackmon SH, Correa AM, Wynn B, Hofstetter WL, Martin LW, Mehran RJ, Rice DC, Swisher SG, Walsh GL, Roth JA, Vaporciyan AA. Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:1805-1813.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Raz DJ, Tedesco P, Herbella FA, Nipomnick I, Way LW, Patti MG. Side-to-side stapled intra-thoracic esophagogastric anastomosis reduces the incidence of leaks and stenosis. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21:69-72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ben-David K, Sarosi GA, Cendan JC, Hochwald SN. Technique of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy with intrathoracic stapled side-to-side anastomosis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:1613-1618.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gorenstein LA, Bessler M, Sonett JR. Intrathoracic linear stapled esophagogastric anastomosis: an alternative to the end to end anastomosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:314-316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Okabe H, Tanaka E, Tsunoda S, Obama K, Sakai Y. Intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis using a linear stapler following minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17:397-402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco G. Patti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allaix, M.E., Herbella, F.A. & Patti, M.G. Hybrid Trans-thoracic Esophagectomy with Side-to-Side Stapled Intra-thoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis for Esophageal Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 17, 1972–1979 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2281-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2281-7

Keywords

Navigation