Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Complete Clinical Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Squamous Cell Cancer of the Thoracic Oesophagus: Is Surgery Always Necessary?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT) before oesophagectomy is standard management for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the thoracic oesophagus. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of patients who had clinical complete response (CR) with neoadjuvant CT-RT + oesophagectomy with the survival of patients who had clinical CR and were not operated on.

Patients and Methods

Seventy-seven consecutive patients with SCC of the thoracic oesophagus with CR with neoadjuvant CT-RT presenting at the Regional Center of Esophageal Diseases from 1992 to 2008 were included in this retrospective study on a prospectively collected database. Thirty-nine patients underwent oesophagectomy (CT-RT + oesophagectomy), while 38 (CT-RT) were not operated on because they were considered unfit for surgery or refused the operation. Patients’ outcome and survival were compared.

Results

In the CT-RT + oesophagectomy group, clinical CR was confirmed after histological examination of the surgical specimen in 27/39 (69.2 %) patients. Five-year overall survival rates were 50.0 % in the CT-RT + oesophagectomy group and 57.0 % in the CT-RT group (p = 0.99); 5-year disease-free survival rates were 55.5 % in the CT-RT + oesophagectomy group and 34.6 % in the CT-RT group (p = 0.15). Even after adjusting for propensity score, age, ASA and clinical stage, the treatment regimen did not show a statistically significant effect on overall survival (adjusted p = 0.65) nor on disease-free survival (adjusted p = 0.15).

Conclusion

In our group of patients with clinical CR after neoadjuvant CT-RT for SCC of the thoracic oesophagus, waiting for recurrence and then using salvage surgery did not negatively impact their survival compared to patients treated with surgery. More accurate restaging protocols are warranted to improve decision making after CR with neoadjuvant CT-RT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:10–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Refaely Y, Krasna MJ: Multimodality therapy for esophageal cancer. Surg Clin North Am 82:729–746, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ. Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003 4;349(23):2241–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu PC, Posner MC. The role of surgery in the management of oesophageal cancer. Lancet Oncol 2003;4:481–488.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Viklund PLM, Lu M, Ye W, et al. Risk factors for complications after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective population-based study in Sweden. Ann Surg 2006; 243:204–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gebski V, Burmeister B, Smithers BM,et al. Survival benefits from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy in oesophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2007; 8(3):226–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Greer SE, Goodney PP, Sutton JE, Birkmeyer JD. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Surgery. 2005; 137(2):172–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mariette C, Triboulet JP. Is preoperative chemoradiation effective in treatment of oesophageal carcinoma? Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:635– 637.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mariette C, Piessen G, Lamblin A, et al. Impact of preoperative radiochemotherapy on postoperative course and survival in patients with locally advanced squamous cell oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2006;93:1077–1083.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Malaisrie SC, Untch, B; Aranha GV, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer Experience at a single institution. Arch Surg. 2004;139:532–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reynolds JV, Muldoon C, Hollywood D, et al. Long-term outcomes following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg 2007;245: 707–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zacherl J, Sendler A, Stein HJ, et al. Current status of neoadjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus. World J Surg. 2003;27(9):1067–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brücher BL, Stein HJ, Zimmermann F, et al. . Responders benefit from neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: results of a prospective phase-II trial. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004;30(9):963–71

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Berger AC, Farma J, Scott WJ, et al. Complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal carcinoma is associated with significantly improved survival. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:4330–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Herskovic A, Martz K, al-Sarraf M, et al. Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in patients with cancer of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 1992; 326:1593–1598.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Burmeister BH, Dickie G, Smithers BM,et al. Thirty-four patients with carcinoma of the cervical esophagus treated with chemoradiation therapy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:205–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang SH, Lockwood G, Brierley J, Effect of concurrent high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy and conformal radiotherapy oncervical esophageal cancer survival. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 2008; 71(3): 735–740,

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Murakami M, Kuroda Y, Okamoto Y, et al. H. neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by definitive high dose radiotherapy or surgery for operable esophageal carcinoma. Int. J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 1998; 40: (5)1049-059.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim JH, Choi EK, Kim SB,et al. Preoperative hyperfractioned radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy in resectable esophageal cancer. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 50(1):1–12, 2001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin CC, Hsu CH, Cheng JC, et al. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with twice weekly paclitaxel and cisplatin followed by esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Ann Oncol 18: 93–98, 2007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Aoyama N, Koizumi H, Minamide J, Yoneyama K, Isono K. Prognosis of patients with advanced carcinoma of the esophagus with complete response to chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy: a questionnaire survey in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol (2001) 6:132–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stahl M, Stuschke M, Lehmann N, et al. Chemoradiation with and without surgery in patients with Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:2310–2317..

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bedenne L, Michel P, Bouche O, et al. Chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25;(120):1160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al. (eds.) AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th edn. New York: Springer; 2009.

  25. Tahara M, Ohtsu A, Hironaka S, et al. Clinical impact of criteria for complete response (CR) of primary site to treatment of esophageal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2005;35:316–323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Japan Esophageal Society. Japanese classification of esophageal cancer. 10th ed. Tokyo: Kanehara; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:205–216.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mandard AM, Dalibard F, Mandard JC, et al. Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinico-pathologic correlations. Cancer 1994;73:2680–2686. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940601)73:11<2680

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lehnert T. Multimodal therapy for squamous carcinoma of the oesophagus. Br J Surg. 1999;86:727–739.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Law S, Fok M, Chow S, Chu K, Wong J. Preoperative chemotherapy versus surgical therapy alone for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a prospective randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;114:210–217.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Forastiere AA, Heitmiller RF, Kleinberg L. Multimodality therapy for esophageal cancer. Chest. 1997;112:195S-200S.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mallery S, DeCamp M, Bueno R, et al. Pretreatment staging by endoscopic ultrasonography does not predict complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Cancer 1999; 86:764–769

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Laterza E, Manzoni G, Guglielmi A, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the staging of esophageal carcinoma after preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67:1466–1469

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim MP, Correa AM, Lee J, Rice DC, et al. Pathologic T0N1 esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery: an orphan status. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90(3):884–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schneider PM, Metzger R, Schaefer H, et al. Response evaluation by endoscopy, rebiopsy, and endoscopic ultrasound does not accurately predict histopathologic regression after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2008;248(6):902–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Smith TJ, Ryan LM, Douglass HO Jr et al. Combined chemoradiotherapy vs. radiotherapy alone for early stage squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998; 42:269–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Al-Sarraf M, Martz K, Herskovic A et al. Progress report of combined chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in patients with esophageal cancer: an intergroup study. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15:277–284

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Tachimori Y, Kanamori N, Uemura N, Hokamura N, Igaki H, Kato H Salvage esophagectomy after high-dose chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:49–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

This study was partially funded by the Current Research Funds of IOV. Preliminary data from this study were presented as a poster at Digestive Disease Week 2011, held between May 7 and May 10, 2011 in Chicago, IL, USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Scarpa.

Additional information

Carlo Castoro and Marco Scarpa contributed equally to this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Castoro, C., Scarpa, M., Cagol, M. et al. Complete Clinical Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Squamous Cell Cancer of the Thoracic Oesophagus: Is Surgery Always Necessary?. J Gastrointest Surg 17, 1375–1381 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2269-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2269-3

Keywords

Navigation