Skip to main content
Log in

Perineural Invasion in Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic Impact and Treatment Strategies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background

The significance of perineural invasion in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma has not been fully elucidated. This study aims to determine the prognostic impact of and optimal treatment strategy for perineural invasion in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Methods

Medical records of 133 patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who underwent curative resection were reviewed retrospectively. Ninety-eight patients had perineural invasion and 35 patients did not. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed to clarify the prognostic impact of and optimal treatment strategy for perineural invasion.

Results

Only tumor differentiation (P = 0.024) was independently associated with perineural invasion in the multivariate logistic regression model. Multivariate survival analysis revealed that perineural invasion (P = 0.002), resection margin status (P = 0.016), and International Union Against Cancer (UICC) pT factor (P = 0.015) were independent prognostic factors of overall survival. Overall 5-year survival rates for patients with and without perineural invasion were 28 and 74 %, respectively. Among 98 patients with perineural invasion, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.003), lymph node status (P = 0.015), resection margin status (P = 0.008), and UICC pT factor (P = 0.016) were independently associated with overall survival by multivariate analysis. Overall 5-year survival rates for patients with perineural invasion who did and did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy were 33 and 21 %, respectively (P = 0.023).

Conclusions

Perineural invasion is a potent prognostic factor in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Adjuvant chemotherapy may improve the overall survival of patients with perineural invasion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Sohn TA, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma. A spectrum of intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumors. Ann Surg 1996; 224:463–473.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2012; 62:10–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhuiya MR, Nimura Y, Kamiya J, et al. Clinicopathologic studies on perineural invasion of bile duct carcinoma. Ann Surg 1992; 215:344–349.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim S, Kim SW, Bang YJ, et al. Role of postoperative radiotherapy in the management of extrahepatic bile duct cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002; 54:414–419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wakai T, Shirai Y, Moroda T, et al. Impact of ductal resection margin status on long-term survival in patients undergoing resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer 2005; 103:1210–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tamada S, Shibahara H, Higashi M, et al. MUC4 is a novel prognostic factor of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2006; 12:4257–4264.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Oh D, do Lim H, Heo JS, et al. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy in microscopic tumor control after extrahepatic bile duct cancer surgery. Am J Clin Oncol 2007; 30:21–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sasaki R, Takeda Y, Funato O, et al. Significance of ductal margin status in patients undergoing surgical resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg 2007; 31:1788–1796.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Itatsu K, Zen Y, Yamaguchi J, et al. Expression of matrix metalloproteinase 7 is an unfavorable postoperative prognostic factor in cholangiocarcinoma of the perihilar, hilar, and extrahepatic bile ducts. Hum Pathol 2008; 39:710–719.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Li S, Jo YS, Lee JH, et al. L1 cell adhesion molecule is a novel independent poor prognostic factor of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2009; 15:7345–7351.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kitamura K, Hatano E, Higashi T, et al. Prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2011; 18:39–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Oshiro Y, Sasaki R, Kobayashi A, et al. Prognostic relevance of the lymph node ratio in surgical patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2011; 37:60–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim TH, Han SS, Park SJ, et al. Role of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resected extrahepatic biliary tract cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 81:e853-859.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Park JH, Choi EK, Ahn SD, et al. Postoperative chemoradiotherapy for extrahepatic bile duct cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 79:696–704.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou L, He XD, Cui QC, Zhou WX et al. Expression of LAPTM4B-35: a novel marker of progression, invasiveness and poor prognosis of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Lett 2008; 264:209–217.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS, et al. Preoperative cholangitis and metastatic lymph node have a negative impact on survival after resection of extrahepatic bile duct cancer. World J Surg 2012; 36:1842–1847.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Oshikiri T, Miyamoto M, Shichinohe T, et al. Prognostic value of intratumoral CD8+ T lymphocyte in extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma as essential immune response. J Surg Oncol 2003; 84:224–228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoshikawa D, Ojima H, Iwasaki M, et al. Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of EGFR, VEGF, and HER2 expression in cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Cancer 2008; 98:418–425.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hong SM, Cho H, Lee OJ, et al. The number of metastatic lymph nodes in extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma as a prognostic factor. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29:1177–1183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Peng J, Sheng W, Huang D, et al. Perineural invasion in pT3N0 rectal cancer: the incidence and its prognostic effect. Cancer 2011; 117:1415–1421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chatterjee D, Katz MH, Rashid A, et al. Perineural and intraneural invasion in posttherapy pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens predicts poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2012; 36:409–417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Feng FY, Qian Y, Stenmark MH, et al. Perineural invasion predicts increased recurrence, metastasis, and death from prostate cancer following treatment with dose-escalated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 81:e361-367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sudo T, Murakami Y, Uemura K, et al. Prognostic impact of perineural invasion following pancreatoduodenectomy with lymphadenectomy for ampullary carcinoma. Dig Dis Sci 2008; 53:2281–2286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shirai K, Ebata T, Oda K, et al. Perineural invasion is a prognostic factor in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg 2008; 32:2395–2402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamaguchi R, Nagino M, Oda K, et al. Perineural invasion has a negative impact on survival of patients with gallbladder carcinoma. Br J Surg 2002; 89:1130–1136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005; 138:8–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 2007; 142:761–768.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240:205–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Japanese Society of Biliary Surgery. General Rules for Surgical and Pathological Studies on Cancer of the Biliary Tract. 5th ed. Tokyo: Kanehara; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (eds). Internatinal Union Against Cancer (UICC): TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors. 7th ed. New York: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T, et al. Adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy improves survival after aggressive surgical resection for advanced biliary carcinoma. Ann Surg 2009; 250:950–956.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T, et al. Prognostic factors after surgical resection for intrahepatic, hilar, and distal cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18:651–658.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 after surgical resection for advanced biliary carcinoma: outcomes and prognostic factors. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2012; 19:306–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kobayashi H, Murakami Y, Uemura K, et al. Human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 expression predicts survival of advanced cholangiocarcinoma patients treated with gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy after surgical resection. Ann Surg 2012; 256:288–296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T, et al. Prognostic factors of patients with advanced gallbladder carcinoma following aggressive surgical resection. J Gastrointest Surg 2011; 15:1007–1016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T, et al. Gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival after aggressive surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2009; 13:1470–1479.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Shen FZ, Zhang BY, Feng YJ, et al. Current research in perineural invasion of cholangiocarcinoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2010; 10;29:24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshiaki Murakami.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murakami, Y., Uemura, K., Sudo, T. et al. Perineural Invasion in Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic Impact and Treatment Strategies. J Gastrointest Surg 17, 1429–1439 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2251-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2251-0

Keywords

Navigation