Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What Patients and Surgeons Should Know About the Consequences of Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis After Long-Term Follow-Up: Factors Influencing the Incidence of Chronic Abdominal Complaints

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Introduction

Abscess formation and perforation are complications of acute appendicitis that lead to localized or generalized peritonitis. The long-term implications of complicated appendectomy remain largely unknown.

Materials and methods

In the present study, it was investigated whether patients with complicated appendicitis experienced more abdominal complaints after long-term follow-up when compared to uncomplicated cases. In addition, the influence of operation technique (open versus laparoscopic) was studied. A retrospective analysis of 1,481 appendectomies for acute appendicitis was performed in two centers from January 2000 until January 2006. Demographic data, operative reports, intraoperatively adhesions and complications, abdominal pain, and satisfaction were monitored. In total, 1,433 patients were invited to fill out a questionnaire with a median follow-up of 7.1 years. Questionnaires of 526 (37 %) patients were suitable for analysis.

Results

Perforation, abdominal abscesses, or adhesions at initial operation did not result in more abdominal complaints when compared to appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Additionally, no significant differences in abdominal complaints were seen between laparoscopic and open techniques.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the results of our study show that after follow-up of 7 years, the incidence of abdominal complaints was not influenced by operative technique or whether acute appendicitis was complicated or not. This finding does not support a causative role for adhesions with regard to chronic abdominal complaints. Our data enables surgeons to inform their patients about the long-term results of appendectomy, whether it was complicated or not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de Dombal, FT, SE Clamp, and K.S. Wardle, Measuring surgical performance in acute abdominal pain: some reflections from international studies. Eur J Surg, 1997. 163(5): p. 323–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hesselink, Trends in surgery. SIG Health Care Information, 1995. ISBN90-707555-46-7.

  3. Drake, F.T., et al., Progress in the diagnosis of appendicitis: a report from Washington State’s Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. Ann Surg, 2012. 256(4): p. 586–94.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hale, D.A., et al., Appendectomy: a contemporary appraisal. Ann Surg, 1997. 225(3): p. 252–61.

  5. Andersson, R.E., Small bowel obstruction after appendicectomy. Br J Surg, 2001. 88(10): p. 1387–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Leung, T.T., et al., Bowel obstruction following appendectomy: what is the true incidence? Ann Surg, 2009. 250(1): p. 51–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tingstedt, B., et al., Late abdominal complaints after appendectomy—readmissions during long-term follow-up. Dig Surg, 2004. 21(1): p. 23–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. van Goor, H., Consequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions. Colorectal Dis, 2007. 9 Suppl 2: p. 25–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stanciu, D. and D. Menzies, The magnitude of adhesion-related problems. Colorectal Dis, 2007. 9 Suppl 2: p. 35–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. van der Wal, J.B.C. and J.A. Halm, Chronic abdominal pain: the role of adhesions and benefit of laparoscopic adhesiolysis. Gyn Surg, 2006. 3: p. 168–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ellis, H., et al., Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet, 1999. 353(9163): p. 1476–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Menzies, D. and H. Ellis, Intestinal obstruction from adhesions—how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 1990. 72(1): p. 60–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Eypasch, E., et al., Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg, 1995. 82(2): p. 216–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nieveen Van Dijkum, E.J., et al., Validation of the gastrointestinal quality of life index for patients with potentially operable periampullary carcinoma. Br J Surg, 2000. 87(1): p. 110-5.

  15. Swank, D.J., et al., Laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain: a blinded randomised controlled multi-centre trial. Lancet, 2003. 361(9365): p. 1247–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Onders, R.P. and E.A. Mittendorf, Utility of laparoscopy in chronic abdominal pain. Surgery, 2003. 134(4): p. 549–52; discussion 552–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Paajanen, H., K. Julkunen, and H. Waris, Laparoscopy in chronic abdominal pain: a prospective nonrandomized long-term follow-up study. J Clin Gastroenterol, 2005. 39(2): p. 110–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sauerland, S., T. Jaschinski, and E.A. Neugebauer, Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2010(10): p. CD001546.

  19. Swank, H.A., et al., Short- and long-term results of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. World J Surg, 2011. 35(6): p. 1221–6; discussion 1227–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kapischke, M., et al., Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy—quality of life 7 years after surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2011. 396(1): p. 69–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dowson, H.M., et al., Reduced adhesion formation following laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery. Br J Surg, 2008. 95(7): p. 909–14.

  22. Levrant, S.G., E.J. Bieber, and R.B. Barnes, Anterior abdominal wall adhesions after laparotomy or laparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc, 1997. 4(3): p. 353–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lundorff, P., et al., Adhesion formation after laparoscopic surgery in tubal pregnancy: a randomized trial versus laparotomy. Fertil Steril, 1991. 55(5): p. 911–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schafer, M., L. Krahenb hl, and MW Buchler, Comparison of adhesion formation in open and laparoscopic surgery. Dig Surg, 1998. 15(2): p. 148–52

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sokolovic, E., et al., Comparison of resource utilization and long-term quality-of-life outcomes between laparoscopic and conventional colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc, 2004. 18(11): p. 1663–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. van Ramshorst, G.H., et al., Impact of incisional hernia on health-related quality of life and body image: a prospective cohort study. Am J Surg, 2012. 204(2): p. 144–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Eaker, S., et al., Response rate to mailed epidemiologic questionnaires: a population-based randomized trial of variations in design and mailing routines. Am J Epidemiol, 1998. 147(1): p. 74–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hazell, M.L., et al., Factors influencing the response to postal questionnaire surveys about respiratory symptoms. Prim Care Respir J, 2009. 18(3): p. 165–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 50, 3015, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    M. Ditzel, T. M. van Ginhoven, W. Hop & J. F. Lange

  2. Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands

    J. B. C. van der Wal

  3. Department of Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    P. P. L. O. Coene & E. van der Harst

Authors
  1. M. Ditzel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. M. van Ginhoven
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. B. C. van der Wal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. W. Hop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P. P. L. O. Coene
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J. F. Lange
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. E. van der Harst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Ditzel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ditzel, M., van Ginhoven, T.M., van der Wal, J.B.C. et al. What Patients and Surgeons Should Know About the Consequences of Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis After Long-Term Follow-Up: Factors Influencing the Incidence of Chronic Abdominal Complaints. J Gastrointest Surg 17, 1471–1476 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2235-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2235-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation