Abstract
Introduction
The expansion of robotic-assisted surgery is occurring quickly, though little is generally known about the “learning curve” for the technology with utilization for complex esophageal procedures. The purpose of this study is to define the learning curve for robotic-assisted esophagogastrectomy with respect to operative time, conversion rates, and patient safety.
Methods
We have prospectively followed all patients undergoing robotic-assisted esophagogastrectomy and compared operations performed at our institutions by a single surgeon in successive cohorts of 10 patients. Our measures of proficiency included: operative times, conversion rates, and complications. Statistical analyses were undertaken utilizing Spearman regression analysis and Mann–Whitney U test. Significance was accepted with 95 % confidence.
Results
Fifty-two patients (41 male: 11 female) of mean age 66.2 ± 8.8 years underwent robotic-assisted esophagogastrectomies for malignant esophageal disease. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation was administered to 30 (61 %) patients. A significant reduction in operative times (p <0.005) following completion of 20 procedures was identified (514 ± 106 vs. 397 ± 71.9). No conversions to open thoracotomy were required. Complication rates were low and not significantly different between any 10-patient cohort; however, no complications occurred in the final 10-patient cohort. There were no in-hospital mortalities.
Conclusions
For surgeons proficient in performing minimally-invasive esophagogastrectomies, the learning curve for a robotic-assisted procedure appears to begin near proficiency after 20 cases. Operative complications and conversions were infrequent and unchanged across successive 10-patient cohorts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D’Amico TA. Robotics in thoracic surgery: Applications and outcomes. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2006;131(1):19–20.
Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: The Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology 2002;60(5):864–68.
Bodner J, Wykypiel H, Wetscher G, Schmid T. First experiences with the da Vinci™ operating robot in thoracic surgery. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 2004;25(5):844–51.
Flores RM, Alam N. Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy (VATS), Open Thoracotomy, and the Robot for Lung Cancer. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2008;85(2):S710-S15.
Morgan JA, Ginsburg ME, Sonett JR, Morales DLS, Kohmoto T, Gorenstein LA, et al. Advanced thoracoscopic procedures are facilitated by computer-aided robotic technology. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 2003;23(6):883–87.
Dunn DH, Johnson EM, Morphew JA, Dilworth HP, Krueger JL, Banerji N. Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year single-center experience. Diseases of the Esophagus 2012:no-no.
Teplitz CJ. The Learning Curve Deskbook: A Reference Guide to Theory, Calculations, and Applications New York: Quorum Books, 1991.
Galvani C, Gorodner M, Moser F, Jacobsen G, Chretien C, Espat N, et al. Robotically assisted laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy. Surgical Endoscopy 2008;22(1):188–95.
Giulianotti P CAAM, et al. Robotics in general surgery: Personal experience in a large community hospital. Archives of Surgery 2003;138(7):777–84.
Horgan S, Berger RA, Elli EF, Espat NJ. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy. The American surgeon 2003;69(7):624–26.
Landry CS, Grubbs EG, Stephen Morris G, Turner NS, Christopher Holsinger F, Lee JE, et al. Robot assisted transaxillary surgery (RATS) for the removal of thyroid and parathyroid glands. Surgery 2011;149(4):549–55.
Puntambekar SP, Rayate N, Joshi S, Agarwal G. Robotic transthoracic esophagectomy in the prone position: Experience with 32 patients with esophageal cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;142(5):1283–84.
Ruurda JP, Gooszen HG, Broeders IAMJ. Early experience in robot-assisted laparoscopic Heller myotomy. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 2004;39(241):4–8.
van Hillegersberg R, Boone J, Draaisma W, Broeders I, Giezeman M, Rinkes I. First experience with robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagolymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Surgical Endoscopy 2006;20(9):1435–39.
Weksler B, Sharma P, Moudgill N, Chojnacki KA, Rosato EL. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy is equivalent to thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy. Diseases of the Esophagus 2012;25(5):403–09.
Bokhari M, Patel C, Ramos-Valadez D, Ragupathi M, Haas E. Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surgical Endoscopy 2011;25(3):855–60.
Boone J, Schipper MEI, Moojen WA, Borel Rinkes IHM, Cromheecke GJE, van Hillegersberg R. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy for cancer. British Journal of Surgery 2009;96(8):878–86.
Hayn MH, Hussain A, Mansour AM, Andrews PE, Carpentier P, Castle E, et al. The Learning Curve of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. European Urology 2010;58(2):197–202.
AA Santillan JF, KL Meredith, NR Shah, ST Kelley. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Esophageal Cancer. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2008;6(9):879–84.
Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, McCaughan JS, Litle VR, et al. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Outcomes in 222 Patients. Annals of Surgery 2003;238(4):486–95.
Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, Levy RM, Keeley S, Shende M, et al. Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Review of Over 1000 Patients. Annals of Surgery 2012;256(1):95–103. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182590603.
Melis M, Weber J, McLoughlin J, Siegel E, Hoffe S, Shridhar R, et al. An Elevated Body Mass Index Does Not Reduce Survival After Esophagectomy for Cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2011;18(3):824–31.
Meredith K, Weber J, Turaga K, Siegel E, McLoughlin J, Hoffe S, et al. Pathologic Response after Neoadjuvant Therapy is the Major Determinant of Survival in Patients with Esophageal Cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2010;17(4):1159–67.
R.J.J. Verhage EJH, J. Boone, R. Van Hillegersberg. Minimally Invasive Surgery Compared to Open Procedures in Esophagectomy for Cancer: a Systematic Review of the Literature. Minerva Chirugica 2009;64(2):135–46.
Safranek PM, Cubitt J, Booth MI, Dehn TCB. Review of open and minimal access approaches to oesophagectomy for cancer. British Journal of Surgery 2010;97(12):1845–53.
Yamamoto S, Kawahara K, Maekawa T, Shiraishi T, Shirakusa T. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for stage I and II esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80(6):2070–5.
RC C, BC R, LA N, DA. B. Comparing outcomes after transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy: a 5-year prospective cohort of 17,395 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2007;6(205):735–40.
Biere SSAY, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 2012;379(9829):1887–92.
Kim DJ, Hyung WJ, Lee CY, Lee J-G, Haam SJ, Park I-K, et al. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: Feasibility and safety of robotic assistance in the prone position. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2010;139(1):53–59.e1.
Nagpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A, Yakoub D, James D, Ashrafian H, et al. Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surgical Endoscopy 2010;24(7):1621–29.
Gabriel I. Barbash MD, M.P.H, Sherry A. Glied PD. New Technology and Health Care Costs — The Case of Robot-Assisted Surgery. N Engl J Med 2010;363:701–04.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hernandez, J.M., Dimou, F., Weber, J. et al. Defining the Learning Curve for Robotic-assisted Esophagogastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 17, 1346–1351 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2225-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2225-2