Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 17, Issue 7, pp 1173–1180 | Cite as

Outcomes for Trainees vs Experienced Surgeons Undertaking Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery - Is Equipoise Achieved?

  • Claire N. Brown
  • Lorelle T. Smith
  • David I. Watson
  • Peter G. Devitt
  • Sarah K. Thompson
  • Glyn G. Jamieson
Original Article



There is a learning curve associated with laparoscopic antireflux surgery which has an impact on patient outcomes. It is unclear, however, whether this can be eliminated by supervision of early cases by experienced surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of training under supervision on outcomes for laparoscopic fundoplication.


Patients undergoing primary laparoscopic antireflux surgery from 1995 to 2009 were identified from a prospective database. Patients were classified according to whether they were operated on by an experienced consultant or supervised trainee, and sub-categorised according to the presence of a very large hiatus hernia. A standardised questionnaire was used to assess outcomes for heartburn, dysphagia and satisfaction at 1 and 5 years follow-up. Outcomes for the study groups were compared.


One thousand seven hundred and ten patients underwent surgery; 1,112 were operated on by consultants and 598 by trainees. The peri-operative complication rate was not different between the groups, although in patients operated on by trainees, there were increased rates of endoscopic dilatation (9 vs. 5 % p = 0.014) and re-operation (9 vs. 6 %, p = 0.031), and a lower satisfaction rate (76 vs. 82 %, p = 0.044) within 5 years of surgery. All other outcomes were similar for trainees vs. consultants.


The learning curve for laparoscopic fundoplication had a small, but statistically significant, impact on patient outcomes, with slightly lesser outcomes when surgery was undertaken by trainees, even when supervised by experienced surgeons. Although the differences were not large, they raise questions about equipoise and highlight ethical dilemmas with teaching new generations of surgeons.


Laparoscopic fundoplication Antireflux surgery Equipoise Surgical training Learning curve 


  1. 1.
    Chowdhury MM, Dagash HA, Pierro A. A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 145–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boudourakis LD, Wang TS, Roman SA, Desai SR, Sosa JR. Evolution of the surgeon–volume, patient–outcome relationship. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 159–165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Watson DI, Baigrie RJ, Jamieson GG. A learning curve for laparoscopic fundoplication: definable, avoidable, or a waste of time? Ann Surg 1996; 2: 198–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Collard JM, de Gheldere CA, De Kock M, Otte JB, Kestens PJ. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery. What is real progress? Ann Surg 1994; 220: 146–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lind T. Changing surgical principles for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-is laparoscopic fundoplication justified in the light of surgical complications? Eur J Surg Suppl 2000; 585: 31–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). SAGES curriculum outline for resident education 2009. [accessed 11 Jan 2011].
  7. 7.
    Soot SJ, Eshraghi N, Farahmand M, Sheppard BC, Deveney CW. Transition from open to laparoscopic fundoplication: the learning curve. Arch Surg 1999; 134: 278–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hwang H, Turner L Blair NP. Examining the learning curve of laparoscopic fundoplications at an urban community hospital. Am J Surg 2005; 189: 522–526.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miskovic D, Wyles S, Ni M, Darzi AW, Hanna GB. Systematic Review on Mentoring and Simulation in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. Ann Surg 2010; 252: 943–951.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Borowski DW, Ratcliffe AA, Bharathan B, Gunn A, Bradburn DM, Mills SJ et al. Involvement of surgical trainees in surgery for colorectal cancer and their effect on outcome. Colorectal Dis 2008; 10: 837–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zendejas B, Onkendi EO, Brahmbhatt RD. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repairs performed by supervised surgical trainees. Am J Surg 2011; 201: 379–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Engledow AH, Thiruppathy K, Arulampalam T, Motson RW. Training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery - experience of training in a specialist unit. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2010; 92: 395–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jamieson GG, Watson DI, Britten Jones R, Mitchell PC, Anvari M. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Ann Surg 1994; 220: 137–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krysztopik RJ, Jamieson GG, Devitt PG, Watson DI. A further modification of fundoplication. 90 degrees anterior fundoplication. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 1446–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Watson DI, Liu JF, Devitt PG, Game PA, Jamieson GG. Outcome of laparoscopic anterior 180-degree partial fundoplication for gastresophageal reflux disease. J Gastrointest Surg 2000; 4: 486–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wijnhoven BP, Watson DI. Laparoscopic repair of a giant hiatus hernia – how I do it. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12: 1459–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dakkak M, Bennett JR. A new dysphagia score with objective validation. J Clin Gastroenterol 1992: 14: 99–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Watson DI, Jamieson GG, Devitt PG, Kennedy JA, Ellis T, Ackroyd R et al. A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with anterior vs posterior hiatal repair. Arch Surg 2001; 136: 745–751.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Salkini MW, Hamilton AJ. The Effect of Age on Acquiring Laparoscopic Skills. J Endourol 2010; 23: 377–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gill J, Booth MI, Stratford J, Dehn TCB. The Extended Learning curve for laparoscopic fundoplication: A Cohort Analysis of 400 Consecutive Cases. J Gastrointest Surg 2007; 11: 487–492.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Skinner DB, Belsey RH. Surgical management of esophageal reflux and hiatus hernia. Long-term results with 1,030 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1967; 53: 33–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Andujar JJ, Papasavas PK, Birdas T, Robke J, Raftopoulos Y, Gagné DJ et al. Laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hernia is associated with a low incidence of recurrence and reoperation. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 444–447.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Porta CR, Sebesta JA, Brown TA, Steele SR, Martin MJ. Training Surgeons and the Informed Consent Process. Routine Disclosure of Trainee Participation and Its Effect on Patient Willingness and Consent Rates. Arch Surg 2012 147:57–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Versluis MA, van der Linden PJ. Patients' attitude towards residents' participation during gynaecological surgery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 153: 203–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nguyen TN, Silver D, Arthurs B. Consent to cataract surgery performed by residents. Can J Ophthalmol 2005; 40: 34–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Santen SA, Hemphill RR, McDonald MF. Patients' willingness to allow residents to learn to practice medical procedures. Acad Med 2004; 79: 144–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jones JW, McCullough LB, Richman BW. The ethics of surgical practice: cases, dilemmas, and resolutions. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 85–87.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claire N. Brown
    • 1
  • Lorelle T. Smith
    • 1
  • David I. Watson
    • 2
  • Peter G. Devitt
    • 1
  • Sarah K. Thompson
    • 1
  • Glyn G. Jamieson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery and the Royal Adelaide HospitalUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical CentreFlinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations