Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 179–187 | Cite as

Multivisceral Transplantation: Expanding Indications and Improving Outcomes

  • Richard S. Mangus
  • A. Joseph Tector
  • Chandrashekhar A. Kubal
  • Jonathan A. Fridell
  • Rodrigo M. Vianna
2012 SSAT Plenary Presentation

Abstract

Introduction

Multivisceral transplantation includes the simultaneous transplantation of multiple abdominal viscera including the stomach, duodenum, pancreas, and small intestine, with (multivisceral transplant, MVT) or without the liver (modified MVT, MMVT). This study reviews the changing indications and outcomes for this procedure over a 7-year period at a university medical center.

Methods

This study is a retrospective case review of MVTs performed between 2004 and 2010 at a single center. All cases were either MVT or MMVT and included a simultaneous kidney transplant, if indicated. Graft failure was defined as loss of the graft or complete loss of function. Graft function was monitored by clinical function, laboratory values, and serial endoscopy with biopsy.

Results

During the study period, 95 patients received 100 transplants including 84 MVT and 16 MMVT. There were 19 patients who received a simultaneous kidney graft. There were 24 pediatric and 76 adult recipients (range 7 months to 66 years). Indications included intestinal failure alone, intestinal failure with cirrhosis, complete portal mesenteric thrombosis, slow-growing central abdominal tumors, intestinal pseudoobstruction, and frozen abdomen. All patients received antibody-based induction immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitor-based maintenance immunosuppression. At a median mortality adjusted follow-up of 25 months, 1- and 3-year patient survival is 72 % and 57 %. There was a learning curve with this complex procedure resulting in a 48 % patient survival during the period from 2004 to 2007, followed by a 70 % patient survival during the period from 2008 to 2010. Post-transplant complications included rejection (50 % MMVT and 17 % MVT), infection (>90 % first year), graft versus host disease (13 %), and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (5 %).

Conclusion

Indications for MVT and MMVT have broadened to include patients with terminal conditions not amenable to other medical therapies such as slow-growing tumors of the mesenteric root, complete portomesenteric thrombosis, and abdominal catastrophes/frozen abdomen. Outcomes have improved over time with many patients returning to full functional status and enjoying long-term survival.

Keywords

Multivisceral transplant Modified multivisceral transplant Outcomes Surgical indications 

References

  1. 1.
    Starzl TE, Rowe MI, Todo S, et al. Transplantation of multiple abdominal viscera. JAMA 1989; 261 (10): 1449.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Starzl T, Todo S, Tzakis A, et al. The many faces of multivisceral transplantation. Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics 1991; 172 (5): 335.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fridell JA, Joseph Tector A, Mangus RS, Kazimi MM, Hollinger EF, Vianna RM. A new vascular approach to the modified multivisceral graft procurement. Clinical Transplantation 2009; 23 (6): 784.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kato T, Nishida S, Levi D, Madariaga J, Nery J, Tzakis A. Multivisceral transplantation without the liver. Transplantation Proceedings 2002; 34 (3): 910.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vianna RM, Mangus RS, Fridell JA, Kazimi M, Hollinger E, Tector J. Initiation of an intestinal transplant program: the Indiana experience. Transplantation 2008; 85 (12): 1784.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vianna R, Giovanardi RO, Fridell JA, Tector AJ. Multivisceral transplantation for diffuse portomesenteric thrombosis in a patient with life-threatening esophagogastroduodenal bleeding. Transplantation 2005; 80 (4): 534.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vianna R, Mangus, RS, Kubal, CA, Fridell, JA, Beduschi, T, Tector, AJ. . Multivisceral transplantation for diffuse portomesenteric thrombosis. Annals of Surgery 2012; In Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Florman SS, Fishbein TM, Schiano T, Letizia A, Fennelly E, DeSancho M. Multivisceral transplantation for portal hypertension and diffuse mesenteric thrombosis caused by protein C deficiency. Transplantation 2002; 74 (3): 406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Starzl TE, Todo S, Tzakis A, et al. Abdominal organ cluster transplantation for the treatment of upper abdominal malignancies. Annals of Surgery 1989; 210 (3): 374.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Olausson M, Friman S, Herlenius G, et al. Orthotopic liver or multivisceral transplantation as treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. Liver Transplantation 2007; 13 (3): 327.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mangus RS, Tector AJ, Fridell JA, Kazimi M, Hollinger E, Vianna RM. Comparison of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution and University of Wisconsin solution in intestinal and multivisceral transplantation. Transplantation 2008; 86 (2): 298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Abu-Elmagd K, Fung J, Bueno J, et al. Logistics and technique for procurement of intestinal, pancreatic, and hepatic grafts from the same donor. Annals of Surgery 2000; 232 (5): 680.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vianna RM, Mangus RS, Tector AJ. Current status of small bowel and multivisceral transplantation. Advances in Surgery 2008; 42: 129.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vianna RM, Mangus RS, Fridell JA, Weigman S, Kazimi M, Tector J. Induction immunosuppression with thymoglobulin and rituximab in intestinal and multivisceral transplantation. Transplantation 2008; 85 (9): 1290.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vianna R. Immunologic basis of allograft rejection and immunosuppressive agents in intestinal transplantation. Minerva Pediatrica 2009; 61 (3): 293.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ruiz P, Kato T, Tzakis A. Current status of transplantation of the small intestine. Transplantation 2007; 83 (1): 1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tzakis AG, Kato T, Levi DM, et al. 100 multivisceral transplants at a single center. Annals of Surgery 2005; 242 (4): 480.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Abu-Elmagd KM, Costa G, Bond GJ, et al. Five hundred intestinal and multivisceral transplantations at a single center: major advances with new challenges. Annals of Surgery 2009; 250 (4): 567.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Record Owner NLM, English, English, et al. Surgical strategies for liver transplantation in the case of portal vein thrombosis—current role of cavoportal hemitransposition and renoportal anastomosis. 2006; 20 (5): 551.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard S. Mangus
    • 1
  • A. Joseph Tector
    • 1
  • Chandrashekhar A. Kubal
    • 1
  • Jonathan A. Fridell
    • 1
  • Rodrigo M. Vianna
    • 1
  1. 1.Transplant Division, Department of SurgeryIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations