Abstract
Introduction
Hepatic, pancreatic, and complex biliary (HPB) surgery can be associated with major morbidity and significant mortality. For the past 5 years, the American College of Surgeons–National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS–NSQIP) has gathered robust data on patients undergoing HPB surgery. We sought to use the ACS–NSQIP data to determine which preoperative variables were predictive of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing HPB surgery.
Methods
Data collected from ACS–NSQIP on patients undergoing hepatic, pancreatic, or complex biliary surgery between 2005 and 2009 were analyzed (n = 13,558). Diagnoses and surgical procedures were categorized into 10 and eight groups, respectively. Seventeen preoperative clinical variables were assessed for prediction of 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to develop a risk model.
Results
Of the 13,558 patients who underwent an HPB procedure, 7,321 (54%) had pancreatic, 4,881 (36%) hepatic, and 1,356 (10%) biliary surgery. Overall, 70.3% of patients had a cancer diagnosis. Post-operative complications occurred in 3,850 patients for an overall morbidity of 28.4%. Serious complications occurred in 2,522 (18.6%) patients; 366 patients died for an overall peri-operative mortality of 2.7%. Peri-operative outcome was associated with diagnosis and type of procedure. Hepatic trisectionectomy (5.8%) and total pancreatectomy (5.4%) had the highest 30-day mortality. Of the preoperative variables examined, age >74, dyspnea with moderate exertion, steroid use, prior cardiac procedure, ascites, and pre-operative sepsis were associated with morbidity and mortality (all P < 0.05).
Conclusions
While overall morbidity and mortality for HPB surgery are low, peri-operative outcomes are heterogeneous and depend on diagnosis, procedure type, and key clinical factors. By combining these factors, an ACS–NSQIP “HPB Risk Calculator” may be developed in the future to help better risk-stratify patients being considered for complex HPB surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Grobmyer SR, Pieracci FM, Allen PJ, et al: Defining morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy: use of a prospective complication grading system. J Am Coll Surg 204:356-64, 2007
Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, et al: 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: A single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1199-210; discussion 1210-1, 2006
Ziegler KM, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, et al: Pancreatic surgery: evolution at a high-volume center. Surgery 148:702-9; discussion 709-10, 2010
Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, et al: Improving perioperative outcome expands the role of hepatectomy in management of benign and malignant hepatobiliary diseases: analysis of 1222 consecutive patients from a prospective database. Ann Surg 240:698-708; discussion 708-10, 2004
Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y, et al: Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg 236:397–406; discussion 406–7, 2002
Dimick JB, Wainess RM, Cowan JA, et al: National trends in the use and outcomes of hepatic resection. J Am Coll Surg 199:31–8, 2004
Teh SH, Diggs BS, Deveney CW, et al: Patient and hospital characteristics on the variance of perioperative outcomes for pancreatic resection in the United States: a plea for outcome-based and not volume-based referral guidelines. Arch Surg 144:713–21, 2009
Nathan H, Segev DL, Mayo SC, et al: National trends in surgical procedures for hepatocellular carcinoma: 1998–2008. Cancer, 2011
Pawlik TM, Schulick RD, Choti MA: Expanding criteria for resectability of colorectal liver metastases. Oncologist 13:51–64, 2008
Asiyanbola B, Chang D, Gleisner AL, et al: Operative mortality after hepatic resection: are literature-based rates broadly applicable? J Gastrointest Surg 12:842–51, 2008
Hall BL, Hamilton BH, Richards K, et al: Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals. Ann Surg 250:363–76, 2009
Aloia TA, Fahy BN, Fischer CP, et al: Predicting poor outcome following hepatectomy: analysis of 2313 hepatectomies in the NSQIP database. HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association 11:510-5, 2009
Greenblatt DY, Kelly KJ, Rajamanickam V, et al: Preoperative factors predict perioperative morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Annals of surgical oncology 18:2126-35, 2011
Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, Hall BL: Interpretation of the C-statistic in the context of ACS–NSQIP models. Ann Surg Oncol 18 Suppl 3:S295; author reply S296, 2011
Mann CD, Palser T, Briggs CD, et al: A review of factors predicting perioperative death and early outcome in hepatopancreaticobiliary cancer surgery. HPB (Oxford) 12:380–8, 2010
Gawande AA, Kwaan MR, Regenbogen SE, et al: An Apgar score for surgery. J Am Coll Surg 204:201-8, 2007
Hill JS, Zhou Z, Simons JP, et al: A simple risk score to predict in-hospital mortality after pancreatic resection for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1802–7, 2010
Cannon RM, Martin RC, Callender GG, et al: Safety and efficacy of hepatectomy for colorectal metastases in the elderly. J Surg Oncol 104:804–8, 2011
Reddy SK, Barbas AS, Turley RS, et al: Major liver resection in elderly patients: a multi-institutional analysis. J Am Coll Surg 212:787–95, 2011
Riall TS, Reddy DM, Nealon WH, et al: The effect of age on short-term outcomes after pancreatic resection: a population-based study. Ann Surg 248:459–67, 2008
Pitt HA, Kilbane M, Strasberg SM, et al: ACS–NSQIP has the potential to create an HPB–NSQIP option. HPB (Oxford) 11:405–13, 2009
Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD: Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med 364:2128-37, 2011
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kneuertz, P.J., Pitt, H.A., Bilimoria, K.Y. et al. Risk of Morbidity and Mortality Following Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 16, 1727–1735 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1938-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1938-y