Skip to main content
Log in

Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis

  • How I do it
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Objective

Thoracoscopic dissection of the esophagus and laparoscopic dissection of the stomach with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis is a safe method for resection of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction malignancy.

Setting

The setting was at University Tertiary Care Center.

Patients

Subjects are patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction malignancy undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis.

Main Outcome Measures

Technique of a 6-cm side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis is described.

Results

The technique of minimally invasive esophagectomy with side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis is described.

Conclusions

Thoracoscopic dissection of the esophagus, laparoscopic dissection of the stomach, and a side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis is safe, oncologically appropriate, and provides excellent functional results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DePaula AL, Hashiba K, Ferreira EA, de Paula RA, Grecco E. Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy with esophagogastroplasty. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1995;5:1–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Luketich JD, Nguyen NT, Weigel T, Ferson P, Keenan R, Schauer P. Minimally invasive approach to esophagectomy. JSLS 1998;2:243–247.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ben-David K, Rossidis G, Zlotecki RA, Grobmyer SR, Cendan JC, Sarosi GA, Hochwald SN. Minimally invasive esophagectomy is safe and effective following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3324–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ben-David K, Rossidis G, Sarosi G, Hochwald SN. Decreasing morbidity and mortality in one hundred consecutive minimally invasive esophagectomies. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:162–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nguyen NT. Minimally invasive esophagectomy, lessons learned from 104 operations. Ann Surg 2008;248:1081–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Benzoni E, Bresadola V, Terrosu G, Uzzau A, Cedolini C, Intini S, Noce L, Bresadola F. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a comparative study of transhiatal laparoscopic approach versus laparoscopic right transthoracic esophagectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2008;18:178–187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bernabe KQ, Bolton JS, Richardson WS. Laparoscopic hand-assisted versus open transhiatal esophagectomy: a case–control study. Surg Endosc 2005;19:334–337.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bintintan VV, Mehrabi A, Fonouni H, Esmaeilzadeh M, Muller-Stich BP, Funariu G, Ciuce C, Gutt CN. Feasibility of a high intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis without thoracic access after laparoscopic-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a pilot experimental study. Surg Innov 2009;16:228–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Braghetto I, Csendes A, Cardemil G, Burdiles P, Korn O, Valladares H. Open transthoracic or transhiatal esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in terms of morbidity, mortality and survival. Surg Endosc 2006;20:1681–1686.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dapri G, Himpens J, Cadiere GB. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy with the patient in the prone position. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2006;16:278–285.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fabian T, McKelvey AA, Kent MS, Federico JA. Prone thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization for minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 2007;21:1667–1670.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gerhart CD. Hand-assisted laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy using the dexterity pneumo sleeve. JSLS 1998;2:295–298.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Verhage RJ, Hazebroek EJ, Boone J, Van Hillegersberg R. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Minerva Chir 2009;64:135–146.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Horgan S, Berger RA, Elli EF, Espat NJ. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy. Am Surg 2003;69:624–626.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou J, Chen H, Lu JJ, Xiang J, Zhang Y, Hu H, Zhou X, Luo X, Yang F, Tam J. Application of a modified McKeown procedure (thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization three-incision esophagectomy) in esophageal cancer surgery: initial experience with 30 cases. Dis Esophagus 2009;22:687–693.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ben-David K, Sarosi GA, Cendan J Hochwald SN. Technique of minimally invasive IVOR-LEWIS esophagogastrectomy with intrathoracic stapled side to side anastomosis. Journal of Gastroint Surg 2010:14;1613–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kfir Ben-David.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hochwald, S.N., Ben-David, K. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis. J Gastrointest Surg 16, 1775–1781 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1895-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1895-5

Keywords

Navigation