Abstract
Introduction
The recent introduction of a Surgical Safety Checklist has significantly reduced the morbidity and mortality of surgery. Such a simple measure that can impact so highly on surgical outcomes causes all surgeons to pause for thought. This paper documents the introduction of a 10-step intraoperative surgical checklist (ISC) to standardize performance, decision-making, and training during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The checklist’s impact on conversion rates to open cholecystectomy (OC) is presented.
Methods
In 2004, a 10-step ISC was introduced by a single consultant surgeon for the performance of LCs. Data were collected comparing LCs between 1999–2003 (period 1) and 2004–2008 (period 2). Data on sex, age, American Society of Anesthesiology grade, previous abdominal surgery, severity of gallbladder pathology, and conversion to OC were recorded. The chi-squared test with Yates correction was used to compare groups.
Results
In total, 637 LCs were performed, 277 during period 1 and 360 during period 2. Risk factors for conversion (gender, age, previous abdominal surgery, and severity of gallbladder pathology) were not significantly different in the two periods studied. The overall conversion rate to OC fell significantly in period 2 (p = 0.001). Subgroup analysis also showed a significant reduction in conversion rates in female patients (p = 0.002) and patients with grades III and IV gallbladder disease (p = 0.001).
Conclusions
The introduction of a 10-step ISC was temporally related to reduced conversion rates to OC. The standardization of a frequently performed operation such as a LC that could potentially lead to an impact as great the one we observed warrants further attention in prospective, appropriately designed studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Haynes, A.B., et al., A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med, 2009. 360(5): p. 491–9.
Leape, L.L., Error in medicine. Jama, 1994. 272(23): p. 1851–7.
Reason, J., Human error: models and management. Bmj, 2000. 320(7237): p. 768–70.
Degani A, W.E., Cockpit checklists: concepts, design and use human factors. Hum Factors, 1993. 35: p. 345–359.
Classen, D.C., et al., The timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical-wound infection. N Engl J Med, 1992. 326(5): p. 281–6.
Dellinger, E.P., et al., Hospitals collaborate to decrease surgical site infections. Am J Surg, 2005. 190(1): p. 9–15.
Runciman, W.B., Iatrogenic harm and anaesthesia in Australia. Anaesth Intensive Care, 2005. 33(3): p. 297–300.
Gawande, A.A., et al., The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992. Surgery, 1999. 126(1): p. 66–75.
Kable, A.K., R.W. Gibberd, and A.D. Spigelman, Adverse events in surgical patients in Australia. Int J Qual Health Care, 2002. 14(4): p. 269–76.
Keus, F., et al., Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2006(4): p. CD006231.
Livingston, E.H. and R.V. Rege, A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg, 2004. 188(3): p. 205–11.
Tang, B. and A. Cuschieri, Conversions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: risk factors and effects on patient outcome. J Gastrointest Surg, 2006. 10(7): p. 1081–91.
Hugh, T.B., et al., Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective study of outcome in 100 unselected patients. Med J Aust, 1992. 156(5): p. 318–20.
Lingard, L., et al., Evaluation of a preoperative checklist and team briefing among surgeons, nurses, and anesthesiologists to reduce failures in communication. Arch Surg, 2008. 143(1): p. 12–7; discussion 18.
Mazzocco, K., et al., Surgical team behaviors and patient outcomes. Am J Surg, 2008.
Ishizaki, Y., et al., Conversion of elective laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy between 1993 and 2004. Br J Surg, 2006. 93(8): p. 987–91.
Voitk, A.J., S.G. Tsao, and S. Ignatius, The tail of the learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg, 2001. 182(3): p. 250–3.
McCarney, R., et al., The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised, controlled trial. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2007. 7: p. 30.
Fox, N.S., J.S. Brennan, and S.T. Chasen, Clinical estimation of fetal weight and the Hawthorne effect. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2008. 141(2): p. 111–4.
Way, L.W., et al., Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective. Ann Surg, 2003. 237(4): p. 460–9.
Makary, M.A., et al., Operating room debriefings. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf, 2006. 32(7): p. 407–10, 357.
Sexton, J.B., et al., Teamwork in the operating room: frontline perspectives among hospitals and operating room personnel. Anesthesiology, 2006. 105(5): p. 877–84.
Strasberg, S.M., Avoidance of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2002. 9(5): p. 543–7.
Strasberg, S.M., M. Hertl, and N.J. Soper, An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg, 1995. 180(1): p. 101–25.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Robb, W.B., Falk, G.A., Larkin, J.O. et al. A 10-Step Intraoperative Surgical Checklist (ISC) for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy—Can It Really Reduce Conversion Rates to Open Cholecystectomy?. J Gastrointest Surg 16, 1318–1323 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1886-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1886-6