Skip to main content
Log in

Extensive Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy During Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Optimal Results from a Single Center

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Introduction

Recent advances in thoracoscopic surgery have made it possible to perform esophagectomy with conventional lymphadenectomy (paraesophageal and subcarinal lymph node dissection) using minimally invasive techniques. However, minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) combined with extensive lymphadenectomy along the recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLN) has remained technically challenging for thoracic surgeons. The aim of this study was to examine the safety and efficacy of extensive lymphadenectomy when compared to conventional lymphadenectomy during MIE.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data from a cohort of 147 consecutive patients who underwent MIE for esophageal cancer (EC) over a 3-year period at our institution. During thoracoscopic esophagectomy, extensive lymphadenectomy along the RLN was performed on 76 patients from June 2009 to December 2010 (group A), while 71 patients underwent conventional lymphadenectomy from June 2008 to May 2009 (group B) and were enrolled as historical controls. Clinical characteristics including patient demographics, operation features, and the rate and type of complications were recorded for both groups. The number of dissected lymph nodes and the number of patients with nodes positive for cancer on histological examination were determined for both groups. Statistical analysis was used to identify differences between the two groups.

Results

All patients underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy without conversion to open thoracotomy. Patient demographics and operation features were similar between the two groups. Of the 76 patients that underwent extensive lymphadenectomy there were 13 patients (17.11%) who were RLN positive, which resulted in upstaging of TNM in 5 patients (6.58%). The overall incidence of postoperative complications (42.10% versus 39.47%, p = 0.742) and permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (1.32% versus 0%, p = 0.517) was similar between the two groups.

Conclusions

Extensive mediastinal lymphadenectomy during minimally invasive esophagectomy is a feasible procedure for EC patients. It is technically safe and oncologically adequate in experienced hands, and improves the accuracy of tumor staging. Further study is required to discuss its long-term prognostic value for esophagus cancer patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, McCaughan JS, LiMIE VR, Schauer PR, Close JM, Fernando HC. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg. 2003; 238: 486–494.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Smithers BM, GoMIEy DC, Martin I, Thomas JM. Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 2007; 245: 232–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajan PS, Venkatachlam S. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position--experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2006; 203: 7–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berrisford RG, Wajed SA, Sanders D, Rucklidge MW. Short-term outcomes following total minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Br J Surg. 2008; 95: 602–610.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nagpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A, Yakoub D, James D, Ashrafian H, Darzi A, Moorthy K, Athanasiou T. Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24: 1621–1629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Veeramachaneni NK, Zoole JB, Decker PA, Putnam JB Jr, Meyers BF. Lymph node analysis in esophageal resection—American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0060 trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008; 86: 418–421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Akiyama H, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H, Kajiyama Y. Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg. 1994; 220: 364–372.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kang CH, Kim YT, Jeon SH, Sung SW, Kim JH. Lymphadenectomy extent is closely related to long-term survival in esophageal cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007; 31: 154–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fang WT, Chen WH. Current trends in extended lymph node dissection for esophageal carcinoma. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2009; 17: 208–213.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Akaishi T, Kaneda I, Higuchi N, Kuriya Y, Kuramoto J, Toyoda T, Wakabayashi A. Thoracoscopic en bloc total esophagectomy with radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996; 112:1533–1540.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Noshiro H, Iwasaki H, Kobayashi K, Uchiyama A, Miyasaka Y, Masatsugu T, Koike K, Miyazaki K. Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24: 2965–2973.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Puntambekar SP, Agarwal GA, Joshi SN, Rayate NV, Sathe RM, Patil AM. Thoracolaparoscopy in the lateral position for esophageal cancer: the experience of a single institution with 112 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24: 2407–2414.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang H, Tan L, Feng M, Zhang Y, Wang Q. Comparison of the short-term health-related quality of life in patients with esophageal cancer with different routes of gastric tube reconstruction after minimally invasive esophagectomy. Qual Life Res. 2011; 20:179–189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Isono K, Sato H, Nakayama K. Results of a nationwide study on three-field lymph node dissection of esophageal cancer. Oncology. 1991; 48: 411–420.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. He Z, Zhao Y, Guo C, Liu Y, Sun M, Liu F, Wang X, Guo F, Chen K, Gao L, Ning T, Pan Y, Li Y, Zhang S, Lu C, Wang Z, Cai H, Ke Y. Prevalence and risk factors for esophageal squamous cell cancer and precursor lesions in Anyang, China: a population-based endoscopic survey. Br J Cancer. 2010; 103:1085–1088.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stiles BM, Mirza F, Port JL, Lee PC, Paul S, Christos P, Altorki NK. Predictors of cervical and recurrent laryngeal lymph node metastases from esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010; 90: 1805–1811.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsubara T, Ueda M, Nagao N, Takahashi T, Nakajima T, Nishi M. Cervicothoracic approach for total mesoesophageal dissection in cancer of the thoracic esophagus. J Am Coll Surg. 1998; 187: 238–245.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tachibana M, Kinugasa S, Yoshimura H, Shibakita M, Tonomoto Y, Dhar DK, Nagasue N. Clinical outcomes of extended esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2005; 189: 98–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lerut T, De Leyn P, Coosemans W, Van Raemdonck D, Scheys I, LeSaffre E. Surgical strategies in esophageal carcinoma with emphasis on radical lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg. 1992; 216: 583–589.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ando N, Ozawa S, Kitagawa Y, Shinozawa Y, Kitajima M. Improvement in the results of surgical treatment of advanced squamous esophageal carcinoma during 15 consecutive years. Ann Surg. 2000; 232: 225–232.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Junemann-Ramirez M, Awan MY, Khan ZM, Rahamim JS. Anastomotic leakage post-esophagogastrectomy for esophageal carcinoma: retrospective analysis of predictive factors, management and influence on long term survival in a high volume centre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005; 27: 3–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Natsugoe S, Okumura H, Matsumoto M, Ishigami S, Owaki T, Nakano S, Aikou T. Reconstruction of recurrent laryngeal nerve with involvement by metastatic node in esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005; 79: 1886–1889.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dexter SPL, Martin IG, McMahonz MJ. Radical thoracoscopic esophagectomy for cancer. Surg Endosc. 1996 10:147–151.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fang W, Kato H, Tachimori Y, Igaki H, Sato H, Daiko H. Analysis of pulmonary complications after three-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003; 76: 903–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zingg U, Smithers BM, GoMIEy DC, Smith G, Aly A, Clough A, Esterman AJ, Jamieson GG, Watson DI. Factors associated with postoperative pulmonary morbidity after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011; 18: 1460–1468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ninomiya I, Osugi H, Tomizawa N, Fujimura T, Kayahara M, Takamura H, Fushida S, Oyama K, Nakagawara H, Makino I, Ohta T. Learning of thoracoscopic radical esophagectomy: how can the learning curve be made short and flat? Dis Esophagus. 2010; 23: 618–626.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Mr. Jianfeng Luo for the statistical support of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lijie Tan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shen, Y., Zhang, Y., Tan, L. et al. Extensive Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy During Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Optimal Results from a Single Center. J Gastrointest Surg 16, 715–721 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1824-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1824-7

Keywords

Navigation