Skip to main content
Log in

An Extrahepatic Bile Duct Grafting Using a Bioabsorbable Polymer Tube

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

Thus far, no ideal substitutions have been developed for completely replacing the extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD).

Methods

We used a bioabsorbable polymer tube (BAPT) for the complete reconstruction of an EHBD in pigs. A 2-cm-long EHBD was resected from the duodenal side, and a 4-cm-long BAPT graft was implanted at that site. The animals were re-laparotomized at 1 or 4 months after the grafting; subsequently, gross, histological, and blood chemical studies were performed.

Results

At 1 month after grafting, tubular structure was observed in all resected specimens, and the lumen of the graft site had remnants of degraded BAPT. Gross examination at 4 months after grafting revealed that the BAPT had been completely absorbed, and the graft site was indistinguishable from the native extrahepatic bile duct. The lengths of the graft region at 4 months were 70% of the replaced BAPT. Simultaneously performed histological examination revealed the growth of a neo-bile duct at the graft site, with an epithelium identical to that of the native bile duct.

Conclusion

The BAPT graft implanted in this study completely replaced the EHBD defect. Hence, BAPT has the potential for application as a novel treatment modality for hepatobiliary diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lillemoe KD, Melton GB, Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Campbell KA, Talamini MA, Sauter PA, Coleman J, Yeo CJ. Postoperative bile duct strictures: management and outcome in the 1990s. Ann Surg. 2000;232:430–441.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shah SA, Grant DR, McGilvray ID, Greig PD, Selzner M, Lilly LB, Girgrah N, Levy GA, Cattral MS. Biliary strictures in 130 consecutive right lobe living donor liver transplant recipients: results of a Western center. Am J Transplant. 2007;7:161–167.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Walsh RM, Henderson JM, Vogt DP, Brown N. Long-term outcome of biliary reconstruction for bile duct injuries from laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surgery. 2007;142:450–456; discussion 456–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jang JY, Kim SW, Park DJ, Ahn YJ, Yoon YS, Choi MG, Suh KS, Lee KU, Park YH. Actual long-term outcome of extrahepatic bile duct cancer after surgical resection. Ann Surg. 2005;241:77–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chuang JH, Lee SY, Chen WJ, Hsieh CS, Chang NK, Lo SK. Changes in bacterial concentration in the liver correlate with that in the hepaticojejunostomy after bile duct reconstruction: implication in the pathogenesis of postoperative cholangitis. World J Surg. 2001;25:1512–1518.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hsieh CS, Huang LT, Huang CC, Wu JJ, Chuang JH. Bacteria ascend to liver from the bilioenteric conduit after choledochojejunostomy in the cholestatic rat. Pediatr Surg Int. 2003;19:699–702.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kurumado K, Nagai T, Kondo Y, Abe H. Long-term observations on morphological changes of choledochal epithelium after choledochoenterostomy in rats. Dig Dis Sci. 1994;39:809–820.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bettschart V, Clayton RA, Parks RW, Garden OJ, Bellamy CO. Cholangiocarcinoma arising after biliary-enteric drainage procedures for benign disease. Gut. 2002;51:128–129.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Herba MJ, Casola G, Bret PM, Lough J, Hampson LG. Cholangiocarcinoma as a late complication of choledochoenteric anastomoses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986;147:513–515.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Maeda A, Yokoi S, Kunou T, Saeki S, Murata T, Niinomi N, Uesaka K. Bile duct cancer developing 21 years after choledochoduodenostomy. Dig Surg. 2003;20:331–334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tocchi A, Mazzoni G, Liotta G, Lepre L, Cassini D, Miccini M. Late development of bile duct cancer in patients who had biliary-enteric drainage for benign disease: a follow-up study of more than 1,000 patients. Ann Surg. 2001;234:210–214.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Miyazawa M, Torii T, Toshimitsu Y, Okada K, Koyama I, Ikada Y. A tissue-engineered artificial bile duct grown to resemble the native bile duct. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:1541–1547.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Aikawa M, Miyazawa M, Okada K, Toshimitsu Y, Okamoto K, Akimoto N, Koyama I, Ikada Y. Development of a novel reflux-free bilioenteric anastomosis procedure by using a bioabsorbable polymer tube. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2010;17:284–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Aikawa M, Miyazawa M, Okamoto K, Toshimitsu Y, Torii T, Okada K, Akimoto N, Ohtani Y, Koyama I, Yoshito I. A novel treatment for bile duct injury with a tissue-engineered bioabsorbable polymer patch. Surgery. 2010;147:575–580.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aydin M, Bakir B, Kosem M, Kisli E, Genccelep M. Biliary tract reconstruction with autologous rectus sheath graft—an experimental study. Hepatogastroenterology. 2005;52:1019–1022.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Belzer FO, Watts JM, Ross HB, Dunphy JE. Auto-reconstruction of the common bile duct after venous patch graft. Ann Surg. 1965;162:346–355.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bottger T, Mann B, Pickel B, Weber W, Sorger K, Junginger T. [Animal experiment studies of pedicled small intestine transplantation as partial extrahepatic bile duct replacement]. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1991;376:77–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bandura WP, Arbulu A. Experimental replacement of the common bile duct with Teflon graft. Am Surg. 1961;27:518–524.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Christensen M, Laursen HB, Rokkjaer M, Jensen PF, Yasuda Y, Mortensen FV. Reconstruction of the common bile duct by a vascular prosthetic graft: an experimental study in pigs. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2005;12:231–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gomez NA, Alvarez LR, Mite A, Andrade JP, Alvarez JR, Vargas PE, Tomala NE, Vivas AF, Zapatier JA. Repair of bile duct injuries with Gore-Tex vascular grafts: experimental study in dogs. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002;6:116–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mendelowitz DS, Beal JM. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene in reconstruction of the canine biliary system. Am J Surg. 1982;143:221–224.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gomez NA, Zapatier JA, Vargas PE. Re: Small intestinal submucosa as a bioscaffold for biliary tract regeneration. Surgery. 2004;135:460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosen M, Ponsky J, Petras R, Fanning A, Brody F, Duperier F. Small intestinal submucosa as a bioscaffold for biliary tract regeneration. Surgery. 2002;132:480–486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of Interest

We do not have any financial interests to disclose in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitsuo Miyazawa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aikawa, M., Miyazawa, M., Okamoto, K. et al. An Extrahepatic Bile Duct Grafting Using a Bioabsorbable Polymer Tube. J Gastrointest Surg 16, 529–534 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1801-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1801-6

Keywords

Navigation