Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 453–459 | Cite as

Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: Defining Long-Term Clinical and Anatomic Outcomes

  • Brant K. Oelschlager
  • Rebecca P. Petersen
  • L. Michael Brunt
  • Nathaniel J. Soper
  • Brett C. Sheppard
  • Lee Mitsumori
  • Charles Rohrmann
  • Lee L. Swanstrom
  • Carlos A. Pellegrini
2011 SSAT Plenary Presentation



We recently reported in a multi-institutional, randomized study of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (LPEHR) that the anatomic recurrence rate at a median of approximately 5 years was >50%. This study focuses exclusively on the symptomatic response to LPEHR and its relationship with the development of a recurrent hernia.


During 2002 to 2005, 108 patients underwent LPHER with or without biologic mesh. A standardized symptom severity questionnaire, SF-36 health survey, and upper gastrointestinal series were performed at baseline, 6 months, and during 2008–2009.


Of 108 patients, 72 (average age of 68 ± 10 years) underwent clinical assessment, and 60 of them also had radiologic studies at a median follow-up of 58 (40–78) months. Radiographic recurrence (≥20 mm) was 14% at 6 months and 57% at the time of follow-up, and the average recurrence size was 40 ± 10 mm. All symptoms were significantly improved at long-term follow-up and, with the exception of heartburn, were unaffected by the presence or size of the recurrence. Two patients (3%) with recurrent symptoms related to their hernia underwent reoperation.


Despite frequent radiologic recurrences after LPEHR, symptoms remain well controlled, patient satisfaction is high, and the need for reoperation is low.


Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia Recurrence rate Long-term clinical outcomes 



This work was supported in part by Cook Biotech, the Mary and Dennis Wise Fund, and the Byers Endowed Professorship, University of Washington.


  1. 1.
    Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter JG, Brunt ML, Soper NJ, Sheppard BC, Polissar NL, Neradilek, NB, Mitsumori LM, Rohrmann CA, Swanstrom LL. Biologic Prosthesis to Prevent Recurrence after Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: Long-term Follow-up from a Multi-center, Prospective, Randomized Trial. Presented at American College of Surgeons 96th Annual Meeting 2010.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dallemagne B, Kohnen L, Perretta S, Weerts J, Markiewicz S, Jehaes C. Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Long-term follow-up reveals good clinical outcome despite high radiological recurrence rate. Ann Surg 2011;253:291–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hashemi M, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, Huprich JE, Quek M, Hagen JA, Crookes PF, Theisen J, DeMeester SR, Sillin LF, Bremner CG. Laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia: objective followup reveals high recurrence rate. J Am Coll Surg 2000;190:553–60; discussion 60–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Luketich JD, Nason KS, Christie NA, Pennathur A, Jobe BA, Landreneau RJ, Schuchert MJ, Outcomes after a decade of laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139:395–404, e1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smith GS, Isaacson JR, Draganic BD, Baladas HG, Falk GL. Symptomatic and radiological follow-up after para-esophageal hernia repair. Dis Esophagus 2004;17:279–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter J, Soper N, Brunt M, Sheppard B, Polissar N, Mitsumori L, Nelson J, Swanstrom L. Biologic prosthesis reduces recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg 2006;244:481–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zehetner J, Demeester SR, Ayazi S, Kilday P, Augustin F, Hagen JA, Lipham JC, Sohn HJ, Demeester TR. Laparoscopic versus Open Repair of Paraesophageal Hernia: The Second Decade. J Am Coll Surg 2011;212:813–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aly A, Munt J, Jamieson GG, Ludemann R, Devitt PG, Watson DI. Laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernias. Br J Surg 2005;92:648–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khaitan L, Houston H, Sharp K, Holzman M, Richards W. Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair has an acceptable recurrence rate. Am Surg 2002;68:546–51; discussion 51–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Casabella F, Sinanan M, Horgan S, Pellegrini CA. Systematic use of gastric fundoplication in laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernias. Am J Surg 1996;171:485–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gantert WA, Patti MG, Arcerito M, Feo C, Stewart L, DePinto M, Bhoyrul S, Rangel S, Tyrrell D, Fujino Y, Mulvihill SJ, Way LW. Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernias. J Am Coll Surg 1998;186:428–32; discussion 32–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Martin TR, Ferguson MK, Naunheim KS. Management of giant paraesophageal hernia. Dis Esophagus 1997;10:47–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oddsdottir M, Franco AL, Laycock WS, Waring JP, Hunter JG. Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. New access, old technique. Surg Endosc 1995;9:164–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Perdikis G, Hinder RA, Filipi CJ, Walenz T, McBride PJ, Smith SL, Katada N, Klingler PJ, Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Arch Surg 1997;132:586–9; discussion 90–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pitcher DE, Curet MJ, Martin DT, Vogt DM, Mason J, Zucker KA. Successful laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Arch Surg 1995;130:590–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mattar SG, Bowers SP, Galloway KD, Hunter JG, Smith CD. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Surg Endosc 2002;16:745–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Horgan S, Pohl D, Bogetti D, Eubanks T, Pellegrini C. Failed antireflux surgery: what have we learned from reoperations? Arch Surg 1999;134:809–15; discussion 15–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    van Beek DB, Auyang ED, Soper NJ. A comprehensive review of laparoscopic redo fundoplication. Surg Endosc 2011;25:706–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brant K. Oelschlager
    • 1
  • Rebecca P. Petersen
    • 1
  • L. Michael Brunt
    • 1
  • Nathaniel J. Soper
    • 2
  • Brett C. Sheppard
    • 3
  • Lee Mitsumori
    • 4
  • Charles Rohrmann
    • 4
  • Lee L. Swanstrom
    • 5
  • Carlos A. Pellegrini
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryOregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandUSA
  4. 4.Department of RadiologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  5. 5.Department of SurgeryThe Oregon ClinicPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations