Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 614–622 | Cite as

Evaluating Systemic Stress Response in Single Port vs. Multi-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

  • Colleen G. C. McGregor
  • Mikael H. Sodergren
  • Alec Aslanyan
  • Victoria J. Wright
  • Sanjay Purkayastha
  • Ara Darzi
  • Paraskevas Paraskeva
Original Article

Abstract

Background and Aims

Acute-phase proteins and inflammatory cytokines mediate measurable responses to surgical trauma, which are proportional to the extent of tissue injury and correlate with post-operative outcome. By comparing systemic stress following multi-port (LC) and single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC), we aim to determine whether reduced incision size induces a reduced stress response.

Methods

Thirty-five consecutive patients were included, 11 underwent SILC (mean ± SEM; age 44.8 ± 3.88 year; BMI 27 ± 1.44 kg/m2) and 24 underwent LC (56.17 ± 2.80 year; 31.72 ± 1.07 kg/m2, p < 0.05). Primary endpoint measures included levels of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein measured pre- and post-operatively. Length-of-stay (LOS) and postoperative morbidity were secondary endpoints.

Results

No statistically significant differences were found between SILC and LC for interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein levels, LOS and duration of surgery. There was also no correlation between systemic stress response and operative parameters. There were no intra-operative complications.

Conclusion

SILC appears to be a safe, feasible technique with potential advantages of cosmesis, reduced incisional pain, and well-being recommending its use. These data indicate no difference in systemic stress and morbidity between SILC and LC. A larger, multi-centred, randomised prospective trial is warranted to further investigate and confirm this finding.

Keywords

Cytokines Acute phase response Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) Cholecystectomy 

References

  1. 1.
    Chow A, Aziz O, Purkayastha S, Darzi A, Paraskeva P. Single incision laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis: feasibility in pediatric patients. Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy 2010;2010: pp. 294958.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vittimberga FJ,Jr, Foley DP, Meyers WC, Callery MP. Laparoscopic surgery and the systemic immune response. Annals of Surgery 1998 Mar;227(3): pp. 326–334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chamberlain RS, Sakpal SV. A comprehensive review of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) techniques for cholecystectomy. Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2009 Sep;13(9): pp. 1733–1740.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Glaser F, Sannwald GA, Buhr HJ, Kuntz C, Mayer H, Klee F, et al. General stress response to conventional and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Annals of Surgery 1995 Apr;221(4): pp. 372–380.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keus F, Gooszen HG, Van Laarhoven CJ. Systematic review: open, small-incision or laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2009 Feb 15;29(4): pp. 359–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vander Velpen G, Penninckx F, Kerremans R, Van Damme J, Arnout J. Interleukin-6 and coagulation-fibrinolysis fluctuations after laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy. Surgical endoscopy 1994 Oct;8(10): pp. 1216–1220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. NIH consensus statement 1992 Sep 14–16;10(3): pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leggett PL, Churchman-Winn R, Miller G. Minimizing ports to improve laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgical endoscopy 2000 Jan;14(1): pp. 32–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Trichak S. Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgical endoscopy 2003 Sep;17(9): pp. 1434–1436.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brunner W, Schirnhofer J, Waldstein-Wartenberg N, Frass R, Pimpl K, Weiss H. New: Single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic surgery. European Surgery [Online] 2009 2009;41(3): pp. 98–103. Available from: http://www.springerlink.com/content/g3q303u1k1914614/ [Accessed 25/02/2010].
  11. 11.
    Elazary R, Khalaileh A, Zamir G, Har-Lev M, Almogy G, Rivkind AI, et al. Single-trocar cholecystectomy using a flexible endoscope and articulating laparoscopic instruments: a bridge to NOTES or the final form? Surgical endoscopy 2009 May;23(5): pp. 969–972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ersin S, Firat O, Sozbilen M. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it more than a challenge? Surgical endoscopy 2010 Jan;24(1): pp. 68–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vidal O, Valentini M, Espert JJ, Ginesta C, Jimeno J, Martinez A, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: a safe and reproducible alternative. Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques.Part A 2009 Oct;19(5): pp. 599–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Menger MD, Vollmar B. Surgical trauma: hyperinflammation versus immunosuppression? Langenbeck’s archives of surgery/Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie 2004 Nov;389(6): pp. 475–484.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lin E, Calvano SE, Lowry SF. Inflammatory cytokines and cell response in surgery. Surgery 2000 Feb;127(2): pp. 117–126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grande M, Tucci GF, Adorisio O, Barini A, Rulli F, Neri A, et al. Systemic acute-phase response after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Surgical endoscopy 2002 Feb;16(2): pp. 313–316.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ros A, Gustafsson L, Krook H, Nordgren CE, Thorell A, Wallin G, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study. Annals of Surgery 2001 Dec;234(6): pp. 741–749.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bruce DM, Smith M, Walker CB, Heys SD, Binnie NR, Gough DB, et al. Minimal access surgery for cholelithiasis induces an attenuated acute phase response. American Journal of Surgery 1999 Sep;178(3): pp. 232–234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kristiansson M, Saraste L, Soop M, Sundqvist KG, Thorne A. Diminished interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein responses to laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 1999 Feb;43(2): pp. 146–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baigrie RJ, Lamont PM, Kwiatkowski D, Dallman MJ, Morris PJ. Systemic cytokine response after major surgery. The British journal of surgery 1992 Aug;79(8): pp. 757–760.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kimura F, Shimizu H, Yoshidome H, Ohtsuka M, Kato A, Yoshitomi H, et al. Increased plasma levels of IL-6 and IL-8 are associated with surgical site infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pancreas 2006 Mar;32(2): pp. 178–185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs N, Ostermann S, Charara F, Morel P. Single port access laparoscopic cholecystectomy (with video). World journal of surgery 2009 May;33(5): pp. 1015–1019.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Berggren U, Gordh T, Grama D, Haglund U, Rastad J, Arvidsson D. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: hospitalization, sick leave, analgesia and trauma responses. The British journal of surgery 1994 Sep;81(9): pp. 1362–1365.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shea JA, Healey MJ, Berlin JA, Clarke JR, Malet PF, Staroscik RN, et al. Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis. Annals of Surgery 1996 Nov;224(5): pp. 609–620.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Duca S, Bala O, Al-Hajjar N, Lancu C, Puia IC, Munteanu D, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: incidents and complications. A retrospective analysis of 9542 consecutive laparoscopic operations. HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association 2003;5(3): pp. 152–158.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fronza JS, Linn JG, Nagle AP, Soper NJ. A single institution’s experience with single incision cholecystectomy compared to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery 2010 Oct;148(4): pp. 731–4; discussion 734–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hirano Y, Watanabe T, Uchida T, Yoshida S, Tawaraya K, Kato H, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: single institution experience and literature review. World journal of gastroenterology : WJG 2010 Jan 14;16(2): pp. 270–274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Navarra G, La Malfa G, Lazzara S, Ullo G, Curro G. SILS and NOTES cholecystectomy: a tailored approach. Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques.Part A 2010 Jul–Aug;20(6): pp. 511–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Colleen G. C. McGregor
    • 1
    • 3
  • Mikael H. Sodergren
    • 1
  • Alec Aslanyan
    • 1
  • Victoria J. Wright
    • 2
  • Sanjay Purkayastha
    • 1
  • Ara Darzi
    • 1
  • Paraskevas Paraskeva
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, Imperial College London, Academic Surgical UnitSt Mary’s HospitalPaddingtonUK
  2. 2.Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of MedicineImperial College LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, Division of Surgery, Academic Surgical UnitImperial College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations