Skip to main content
Log in

Tumors Arising at Previous Anastomotic Site may have Poor Prognosis in Patients with Gastric Stump Cancer Following Gastrectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Introduction

We analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of patients with gastric stump cancer (GSC) to identify important prognostic factors.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed clinical reports of 34 patients with GSC treated at Kochi Medical School from 1982 to 2008 to analyze the clinical and pathological factors that influenced patient survival.

Results

The median interval between initial and second operation was 15.8 years; this interval was significantly longer in patients diagnosed originally with benign disease than in those with previous malignant disease. Histologically, the incidence of diffuse-type cancer was significantly prominent in patients with previous benign gastric disease than in those with previous malignant gastric disease. The overall 5-year survival rate was 53.3%, with presence of lymph node metastasis and pathological serosal invasion of the tumor associated with poor survival. The final analysis revealed tumor located at anastomosis, tumor size greater than 5 cm, serosal invasion, the presence of lymph node metastasis, and stage III or higher to be significantly associated with poor survival.

Conclusions

Follow-up programs after gastrectomy should account for long latency periods of disease. Early detection, attentive observation of anastomotic site, and sufficient surgical resection were important influences on outcome for patients with GSC after Billroth I or Billroth II reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thorban S, Bottcher K, Etter M, Roder JD, Busch R, Siewert JR. Prognostic factors in gastric stump carcinoma. Ann Surg 2000;231:188–194.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Balfour DC. Factors influencing the life expectancy of patients operated on for gastric ulcer. Ann Surg 1922;76:405–408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sinning C, Schaefer N, Standop J, Hirner A, Wolff M. Gastric stump carcinoma: epidemiology and current concepts in pathology and treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol 2007;33:133–139.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tanigawa N, Nomura E, Niki M, Shinohara H, Nishiguchi K, Okuzawa M, Toyoda M, Morita S. Clinical study to identify specific characteristics of cancer newly developed in the remnant stomach. Gastric Cancer 2002;5:23–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sano T, Sasako M, Kinoshita T, Maruyama K. Recurrence of early gastric cancer: follow-up of 1475 patients and review of the Japanese literature. Cancer 1993;72:3174–3178.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shimada S, Yagi Y, Shiomori K, Honmyo U, Hayashi N, Matsuo A, Marutsuka T, Ogawa M. Characterization of early gastric cancer and proposal of the optimal therapeutic strategy. Surgery 2001;129:714–719.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ohashi M, Katai H, Fukagawa T, Gotoda T, Sano T, Sasako M. Cancer of the gastric stump following distal gastrectomy for cancer. Br J Surg 2007;94:92–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahn HS, Kim JW, Yoo MW, Park DJ, Lee HJ, Lee KU, Yang HK. Clinicopathological features and surgical outcomes of patients with remnant gastric cancer after a distal gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15:1632–1639.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer 1998;1:10–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (eds). “TNM classification of malignant tumours (7th Edition).” New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wittekind C, Greene F, Hutter RVP, Sobin LH, Henson DE (eds). “TNM supplement: a commentary on uniform use (3rd Edition).” New York: Wiley-Liss, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lauren P. The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma. An attempt at a histoclinical classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 1965;64:31–49.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schaefer N, Sinning C, Standop J, Overhaus M, Hirner A, Wolff M. Treatment and prognosis of gastric stump carcinoma in comparison with primary proximal gastric cancer. Am J Surg 2007;194:63–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hu X, Tian DY, Cao L, Yi Y. Progression and prognosis of gastric stump cancer. J Surg Oncol 2009;100:472–476.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Han SL, Hua YW, Wang CH, Ji SQ, Zhuang J. Metastatic pattern of lymph node and surgery for gastric stump cancer. J Surg Oncol 2003;82:241–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sasako M, Maruyama K, Kinoshita T, Okabayashi K. Surgical treatment of carcinoma of the gastric stump. Br J Surg 1991;78:822–824.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kunisaki C, Makino H, Takagawa R, Oshima T, Nagano Y, Kosaka T, Ono HA, Otsuka Y, Akiyama H, Ichikawa Y, Shimada H. Tumor diameter as a prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15:1959–1967.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Inomata M, Shiraishi N, Adachi Y, Yasuda K, Aramaki M, Kitano S. Gastric remnant cancer compared with primary proximal gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2003;50:587–591.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaneko K, Kondo H, Shirao K, Yamaguchi H, Yokota T, Yamao G, Sano T, Sasako M, Yoshida S. Early gastric stump cancer following distal gastrectomy. Gut 1998;43:342–344.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. An JY, Choi MG, Noh JH, Sohn TS, Kim S. The outcome of patients with remnant primary gastric cancer compared with those having upper one-third gastric cancer. Am J Surg 2007;194:143–147.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Newman E, Brennan MF, Hochwald SN, Harrison LE, Karpeh MS. Gastric remnant carcinoma: just another proximal gastric cancer or a unique entity? Am J Surg 1997;173:292–297.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Piso P, Meyer HJ, Edris C, Jahne J. Surgical therapy of gastric stump carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of 109 patients. Hepatogastroenterology 1999;46:2643–2647.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Matsui N, Yao T, Akazawa K, Nawata H, Tsuneyoshi M. Different characteristics of carcinoma in the gastric remnant: histochemical and immunohistochemical studies. Oncol Rep 2001;8:17–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaminishi M, Shimizu N, Shiomoyama S, Yamaguchi H, Ogawa T, Sakai S, Kuramoto S, Oohara T. Etiology of gastric remnant cancer with special reference to the effects of denervation of the gastric mucosa. Cancer 1995;75:1490–1496.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Namikawa T, Kitagawa H, Okabayashi T, Sugimoto T, Kobayashi M, Hanazaki K. Roux-en-Y reconstruction is superior to Billroth I reconstruction in reducing reflux esophagitis after distal gastrectomy: special relationship with the angle of His. World J Surg 2010;34:1022–1027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Talley NJ, Fock KM, Moayyedi P. Gastric Cancer Consensus conference recommends Helicobacter pylori screening and treatment in asymptomatic persons from high-risk populations to prevent gastric cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:510–514.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nagahata Y, Kawakita N, Azumi Y, Numata N, Yano M, Saitoh Y. Etiological involvement of Helicobacter pylori in ‘reflux’ gastritis after gastrectomy. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:2130–2134.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nakagawara H, Miwa K, Nakamura S, Hattori T. Duodenogastric reflux sustains Helicobacter pylori infection in the gastric stump. Scand J Gastroenterol 2003;38:931–937.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kaminishi M, Shimizu N, Yamaguchi H, Hashimoto M, Sakai S, Oohara T. Different carcinogenesis in the gastric remnant after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Cancer 1996;77:1646–1653.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tanigawa N, Nomura E, Lee SW, Kaminishi M, Sugiyama M, Aikou T, Kitajima M; The Society for the study of postoperative morbidity after gastrectomy. Current state of gastric stump carcinoma in Japan: based on the results of a nationwide survey. World J Surg 2010;34:1540–1547.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Miwa K, Hasegawa H, Fujimura T, Matsumoto H, Miyata R, Kosaka T, Miyazaki I, Hattori T. Duodenal reflux through the pylorus induces gastric adenocarcinoma in the rat. Carcinogenesis 1992;13:2313–2316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Safatle-Ribeiro AV, Ribeiro U Jr, Reynolds JC. Gastric stump cancer: what is the risk? Dig Dis 1998;16:159–168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ojima T, Iwahashi M, Nakamori M, Nakamura M, Naka, T, Katsuda M, Iida T, Tsuji T, Hayata K, Takifuji K, Yamaue H. Clinicopathological characteristics of remnant gastric cancer after a distal gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2010;14:277–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

We certify that there is no actual or potential conflict of interest and no grants or financial support in relation to this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tsutomu Namikawa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Namikawa, T., Kitagawa, H., Iwabu, J. et al. Tumors Arising at Previous Anastomotic Site may have Poor Prognosis in Patients with Gastric Stump Cancer Following Gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 14, 1923–1930 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1298-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1298-4

Keywords

Navigation