Skip to main content
Log in

Factors Predicting Failure Following High Bilio-enteric Anastomosis for Post-cholecystectomy Benign Biliary Strictures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Introduction

Failures following Roux-en-Y hepatico-jejunostomy (HJ) for post-cholecystectomy benign bile duct strictures (BBS) pose significant challenge. This study was aimed to find out the factors predicting failure after surgical repair in patients with BBS.

Methods

Between January 1989 and May 2007, 364 patients underwent Roux-en-Y HJ to the hilum for BBS. With a median follow-up of 61 (6–212) months, 334 (92%) patients had successful outcome and 30 (8%) had failure. A multivariate analysis was performed to find out the factors predicting failure.

Results

Thirty patients who had failure became symptomatic after a median of 35 months (3 days–190 months) after surgical repair. Out of 30 patients, 11 (37%) were experiencing occasional episodes of cholangitis responding to antibiotics. All have patent anastomosis on nuclear scintigraphy and/or cholangiography. Cholangiogram demonstrated anastomotic stricture in 19/30 (63%) patients. Eighteen patients underwent re-intervention for re-strictures (nine — percutaneous balloon dilatation of the stricture, five — revision HJ, one — right hepatectomy, three — a combination of interventions). One patient refused to undergo a planned percutaneous balloon dilatation. Out of 18 patients, 12 (67%) had successful outcome following re-interventions. One patient who underwent revision HJ after a failed percutaneous balloon dilatation died in the immediate postoperative period. Preoperative bilirubin (p = 0.001), attempted bilio-enteric anastomosis before referral (0.004), cirrhosis (0.006), portal hypertension (p = 0.056), repair in the presence of external biliary fistula (0.000), and spontaneous bilio-enteric fistula (p = 0.011) were the factors found to be predicting failure of surgical repair on multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

Previous attempts of repair and delay in repair which predispose cirrhosis and portal hypertension may cause failure of surgical management in patients with BBS. In patients presenting with external biliary fistula, for a better outcome, surgical repair may be delayed till the fistula resolves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, et al. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4292 hospitals and an analysis of 77604 cases. Am J Surg 1993; 165: 9–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Richardson MC, Bell G, Fullarton GM. Incidence and nature of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 5913 cases. Br J Surg 1996; 83: 1356–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Russell JC, Walsh SJ, Mattie AS, et al. Bile duct injuries, 1989–1993 — a state wide experience. Arch Surg 1996; 131: 382–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. The Southern Surgeons Club. A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 1073–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Roslyn JJ, Binns GS, Hughes EFX, et al. Open cholecystectomy — a contemporary analysis of 42,474 patients. Ann Surg 1993; 218: 129–137.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilliland TM, Traverso LW. Modern standards for comparison of cholecystectomy with alternative treatments for symptomatic cholelithiasis with emphasis on long term relief of symptoms. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990; 170: 39–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Savader SJ, Lillemoe KD, Prescott CA, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy related bile duct injuries — a health and financial disaster. Ann Surg 1997; 225: 268–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lillemoe KD, Melton GB, Cameron JL, et al. Post operative bile duct strictures: management and outcome in the 1990s. Ann Surg 2000; 232: 430–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mercado MA, Chan C, Tielve M, et al. Iatrogenic injury to the bile duct — experience with repair in 180 patients. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 2002; 67: 245–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chapman CW, Halevy A, Blumgart LH, et al. Post cholecystectomy bile duct strictures — management and outcome in 130 patients. Arch Surg 1995; 130: 597–604.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sikora SS, Pottakkat B, Srikanth G, et al. Post cholecystectomy benign biliary strictures — long term results. Digest Surg 2006;23(5–6):304–12.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hepp J. Hepaticojejunostomy using the left biliary trunk for iatrogenic biliary lesions: the French connection. World J Surg 1985; 9: 507–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McDonald MI, Farnell MB, Nagorney D, et al. Benign biliary strictures: repair and outcome with a contemporary approach. Surgery 1995; 118: 582–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pottakkat B, Sikora SS, Kumar A, et al. Recurrent bile duct stricture — causes and long term results of surgical management. J HPB Surg 2007;14(2):171–6.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Murr MM, Gigot JF, Nagorney D, et al. Long term results of biliary reconstruction after laparoscopic bile duct injuries. Arch Surg 1999; 134: 604–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schmidt SC, Langrehr JM, Hintze RE, et al. Long-term results and risk factors influencing outcome of major bile duct injuries following cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 76–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pellegrini CA, Thomas MJ, Way LW. Recurrent biliary stricture — pattern of recurrence and outcome of surgical therapy. Am J Surg 1984; 147: 175–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chaudhary A, Chandra A, Negi SS, et al. Reoperative surgery for post cholecystectomy bile duct injuries. Dig Surg 2002; 19: 22–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Blumgart LH, Kelly CJ, Benjamin IS. Benign bile duct stricture following cholecystectomy: critical factors in management. Br J Surg 1984; 71: 836–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mathews JB, Blumgart LH. Benign biliary strictures. In Blumgart LH, editor. Surgery of the liver and the biliary tract. 2nd ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1994. p. 865–94.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Moosa AR, Mayer D, Stabile B. Iatrogenic injury to the bile duct — who, how, where? Arch Surg 1990; 125: 1028–30.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Geng ZM, Yao YM, Liu QG, et al. Mechanism of benign biliary stricture: a morphological and immunohistochemical study. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11: 293–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vinay K. Kapoor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pottakkat, B., Vijayahari, R., Prakash, A. et al. Factors Predicting Failure Following High Bilio-enteric Anastomosis for Post-cholecystectomy Benign Biliary Strictures. J Gastrointest Surg 14, 1389–1394 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1241-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1241-8

Keywords

Navigation