Skip to main content
Log in

A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials that Compared Laparoscopy-Assisted and Open Distal Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background

We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate and compare the advantages of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) over open distal gastrectomy (ODG) for treating early gastric cancer (EGC).

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, and Cochrane Controlled Trial Register for relevant papers published between January 1990 and January 2010 by using the following search terms: laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy, laparoscopic gastrectomy, and early gastric cancer. The following data were analyzed: operative time, estimated blood loss, number of harvested lymph nodes, time required for resumption of oral intake, duration of hospital stay, frequency of analgesic administration, complications, tumor recurrence, and mortality.

Results

We selected four papers reporting randomized control studies (RCTs) that compared LADG with ODG for EGC. Our meta-analysis included 267 patients with EGC; of these, 134 and 133 had undergone LADG and ODG, respectively. The volume of intraoperative blood loss, frequency of analgesic administration, and rate of complications were significantly lesser for LADG than for ODG. However, the time required for resumption of oral intake and duration of hospital stay did not significantly differ between LADG and ODG. The operative time for LADG was significantly longer than that for ODG; further, the number of harvested lymph nodes was significantly lesser in the LADG group than in the ODG group.

Conclusion

LADG is advantageous over ODG because it results in lesser blood loss, is less painful, and is associated with a low risk of complications. Additional RCTs that compare LADG and ODG and investigate the long-term oncological outcomes of LADG are required to determine the advantages of LADG over ODG.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith JK, McPhee JT, Hill JS, et al. National outcomes after gastric resection for neoplasm. Arch Surg 2007;142:387–393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Patel PR, Yao JC, Hess K, et al. Effect of timing of metastasis/disease recurrence and histologic differentiation on survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer. Cancer 2007;110:2186–2190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Reid-Lombardo KM, Gay G, Patel-Parekh L, et al. Gastric Patient Care Evaluation Group from the Commission on Cancer. Treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma may differ among hospital types in the United States, a report from theNational Cancer Data Base. J Gastrointest Surg 2007;11:410–420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yako-Suketomo H, Katanoda K. Comparison of time trends in stomach cancer mortality (1990-2006) in the world, from the WHO mortality database. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2009;39:622–623.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sano T, Hollowood A. Early gastric cancer: diagnosis and less invasive treatments. Scand J Surg 2006;95:249–255.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kitano S. Can an intramucosal undifferentiated-type gastric cancer become a candidate for endoscopic submucosal resection? Gastric Cancer 2009;12:125–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy Surg Laparosc Endosc 1994;4:146–148.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Uyama I, Sugihara K, Tanigawa N; Japanese Laparoscopic Surgery Study Group. A multicenter study on oncologic outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy for early cancer in Japan. Ann Surg 2007;245:68–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goh PM, Khan AZ, So JB, et al. Early experience with laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2001;11:83–87.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Adachi Y, Suematsu T, Shiraishi N, et al. Quality of life after laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Ann Surg 1999;229:49–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kitano S, Adachi Y, Shiraishi N, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted proximal gastrectomy for early gastric carcinomas. Surg Today 1999;29:389–391.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Stabilini C, et al. Laparoscopic and open gastric resections for malignant lesions: a prospective comparative study. Surg Endosc 2005;19:933–938.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Fujii K, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: an interim report. Surgery 2002;131:306–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hayashi H, Ochiai T, Shimada H, et al. (2005) Prospective randomized study of open versus laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with extraperigastric lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 19:1172–1176.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee JH, Han HS, Lee JH. A prospective randomized study comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in early gastric cancer: early results. Surg Endosc 2005;19:168–173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim YW, Baik YH, Yun YH, Nam BH, Kim DH, Choi IJ, Bae JM. Improved quality of life outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 2008;248:721–727.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (1999) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. Tokyo: Kanehara Shuppan

    Google Scholar 

  18. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177–188.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Adachi Y, Shiraishi N, Shiromizu A, Bandoh T, Aramaki M, Kitano S. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy compared with conventional open gastrectomy. Arch Surg 2000;135:806–810.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mochiki E, Nakabayashi T, Kamimura H, Haga N, Asao T, Kuwano H. Gastrointestinal recovery and outcome after laparoscopy-assisted versus conventional open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. World J Surg 2002;26:1145–1149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fujiwara M, Kodera Y, Misawa K, et al. Longterm outcomes of early-stage gastric carcinoma patients treated with laparoscopy-assisted surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2008;206:138–143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim MC, Jung GJ, Kim HH Learning curve of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with systemic lymphadenectomy for early gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2005;11:7508–7511.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mochiki E, Kamiyama Y, Aihara R, et al. Laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: five years’ experience. Surgery 2005;137:317–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vamvakas EC. Perioperative blood transfusion and cancer recurrence: meta-analysis for explanation. Transfusion 1995;35:760–768.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Miura S, Kodera Y, Fujiwara M, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with systemic lymph node dissection: a critical reappraisal from the viewpoint of lymph node retrieval. J Am Coll Surg 2004;198:933–938.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroshi Ohtani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ohtani, H., Tamamori, Y., Noguchi, K. et al. A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials that Compared Laparoscopy-Assisted and Open Distal Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 14, 958–964 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1195-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1195-x

Keywords

Navigation