Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Surgery for Small Bowel Perforation in an Asian Population: Predictors of Morbidity and Mortality

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery volume 14, pages 493–499 (2010)Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

Peritonitis from small bowel perforation is associated with prohibitive morbidity and mortality rates. The aims of our study were to review our institution’s experience in the surgical management of small bowel perforation and to identify factors that could predict morbidity and mortality.

Methods

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent operative intervention for peritonitis from small bowel perforation from January 2003 to May 2008 was performed. Patients were identified from the hospital’s diagnostic index and operating records. The severity of abdominal sepsis for all patients was graded using the Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI). All the complications were graded according to the classification proposed by Clavien and group.

Results

Forty-seven patients, of median age 68 years (18–95 years), formed the study group. Pneumoperitoneum on chest radiographs was seen in only 11 (23.4%) patients. Foreign body ingestion (17.0%), adhesions (14.9%), and malignancy (12.8%) accounted for majority of the pathologies. There was one patient who had several small bowel perforations from Degos disease. Small bowel resection was performed in the majority of the patients (74.5%). The mortality rate in our series was 19.1%, while another 57.4% patients had perioperative complications. On univariate analysis, American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥ 3, MPI > 26, hypotension, stoma creation, abnormal electrolyte level, and renal impairment were related to worse outcome, while the three independent variables that were related to worse outcome after multivariate analysis were MPI > 26, hypotension, and abnormal serum potassium level.

Conclusion

Surgery for small bowel perforation is associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. Patients with more severe peritonitis and physiological derangement were more likely to fare worse.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Orringer RD, Coller JA, Veidenheimer MC. Spontaneous free perforation of the small intestine. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:323–326.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chaikof EL. Nontraumatic perforation of the small bowel. Am J Surg 1987;153:355–358.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rajagopalan AE, Pickleman J. Free perforation of the small intestine. Ann Surg 1982;196:576–579.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Putzki H, Ledwoch J, Dueben W, Mlasowsky B, Heymann H. Nontraumatic perforations of the small intestine. Am J Surg 1985;149:375–377.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van Cleeff MR, Chum HJ. The proportion of tuberculosis cases in Tanzania attributable to human immunodeficiency virus. Int J Epidemiol 1995;24:637–642.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Range N, Ipuge YA, O’Brien RJ, Egwaga SM, Mfinanga SG, Chonde TM, Mukadi YD, Borgdorff MW. Trend in HIV prevalence among tuberculosis patients in Tanzania, 1991–1998. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2001;5:405–412.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Reported HIV status of tuberculosis patients–United States, 1993–2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2007;56:1103–1106.

    Google Scholar 

  8. de Graaf JS, van Goor H, Bleichrodt RP. Primary small bowel anastomosis in generalised peritonitis. Eur J Surg 1996;162:55–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Golub R, Golub RW, Cantu R Jr, Stein HD. A multivariate analysis of factors contributing to leakage of intestinal anastomoses. J Am Coll Surg 1997;184:364–372.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nair A, Pai DR, Jagdish S. Predicting anastomotic disruption after emergent small bowel surgery. Dig Surg 2006;23:38–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Billing A, Fröhlich D, Schildberg FW. Prediction of outcome using the Mannheim peritonitis index in 2003 patients. Peritonitis Study Group. Br J Surg 1994;81(2):209–213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Mentha G, Borst F, Buhler L, Roche B, Cywes R, Tibshirani R, Rohner A, Strasberg SM. Recent results of elective open cholecystectomy in a North American and a European center. Comparison of complications and risk factors. Ann Surg 1992;216:618–626.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tan KK, Zhang J, Liu JZ, Shen SF, Earnest A, Sim R. Right colonic perforation in an Asian population: predictors of morbidity and mortality. J Gastrointest Surg 2009, doi:10.1007/s11605-009-0986-4.

  15. Nagorney DM, Adson MA, Pemberton JH. Sigmoid diverticulitis with perforation and generalized peritonitis. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:71–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Longo WE, Virgo KS, Johnson FE, Oprian CA, Vernava AM, Wade TP, Phelan MA, Henderson WG, Daley J, Khuri SF. Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:83–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zissin R, Osadchy A, Gayer G. Abdominal CT findings in small bowel perforation. Br J Radiol 2009;82:162–171.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. González Valverde FM, Menarguez Pina F, Ruiz JA, Gómez Ramos MJ, Mauri Barbera F, Luri Prieto P, García Marcilla JA, Vázquez Rojas JL. Presentation of Degos syndrome as acute small-bowel perforation. Arch Surg 2003;138:57–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tan KK, Chen K, Sim R. The spectrum of abdominal tuberculosis in a developed country: a single institution’s experience over 7 years. J Gastrointest Surg 2009;13:142–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Aston NO. Abdominal tuberculosis. World J Surg 1997;21:492–499.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Voeller G, Britt L. Surgical management of perforated Crohn’s disease. Am Surg 1990;56:100–103.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brihier H, Nion-Larmurier I, Afchain P, Tiret E, Beaugerie L, Gendre JP, Cosnes J. Intestinal perforation in Crohn’s disease. Factors predictive of surgical resection. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2005;29:1105–1111.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chao TC, Chao HH, Jan YY, Chen MF. Perforation through small bowel malignant tumors. J Gastrointest Surg 2005;9:430–435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brophy C, Cahow CE. Primary small bowel malignant tumors. Unrecognized until emergent laparotomy. Am Surg 1989;55:408–412.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Piñero A, Martínez-Barba E, Canteras M, Rodriguez JM, Castellanos G, Parrilla P. Surgical management and complications of Meckel’s diverticulum in 90 patients. Eur J Surg 2002;168:8–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore

    Ker-Kan Tan, Shieh-Ling Bang & Richard Sim

Authors
  1. Ker-Kan Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shieh-Ling Bang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Richard Sim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ker-Kan Tan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tan, KK., Bang, SL. & Sim, R. Surgery for Small Bowel Perforation in an Asian Population: Predictors of Morbidity and Mortality. J Gastrointest Surg 14, 493–499 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-1097-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-1097-y

Keywords

search

Navigation