Skip to main content
Log in

Management of ERCP-Related Perforations: Outcomes of Single Institution in Korea

  • original article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this study was to analyze clinicoradiologic findings and treatment outcomes of patients with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related perforations. Between May 2003 and November 2007, 2,247 ERCP procedures with or without sphincterotomy were performed at Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Korea, and 20 perforations (0.89%) were identified.

Discussion

We retrospectively reviewed medical and surgical records of each patient. Of 18 patients, 11 patients (61.1%) underwent nonsurgical management, and seven patients (38.9%) received surgical management. There were no significant differences in age, gender, and laboratory findings between two groups (P > 0.05). The hospital stay was significantly longer in the operative group than that of the conservative group (P < 0.05, respectively). The most common cause of perforation was sphincterotomy (n = 8) in the conservative group whereas scope itself (n = 6) in operative group, showing a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). The retroperitoneal air was most common findings in eight patients (72.7%) of the conservative group, while six (85.7%) patients of the operative group presented with intraperitoneal air, displaying a significant difference in location of air between the two groups (P < 0.05). Most of sphincterotomy-related perforations were managed nonsurgically. However, the scope-related perforations were usually large and required immediate surgery. Moreover, the delayed operation resulted in a longer hospital stay and high morbidity. Therefore, the selective early surgical intervention is suggested when scope-related perforations are discovered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ERCP:

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

References

  1. Freeman ML. Adverse outcomes of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:S273–282. doi:10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70025-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dunham F, Bourgeois N, Gelin M, Jeanmart J, Toussaint J, Cremer M. Retroperitoneal perforations following endoscopic sphincterotomy; clinical course and management. Endoscopy 1982;14:92–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RC, Meyers WC, Liguory C, Nickl N. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: An attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991;37:383–393.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Enns R, Eloubeidi MA, Mergener K, Jowell PS, Branch MS, Pappas TM, Baillie J. ERCP-related perforations: Risk factors and management. Endoscopy 2002;34:293–298. doi:10.1055/s-2002-23650.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ, Moore JP, Fennerty MB, Ryan ME, Shaw MJ, Lande JD, Pheley AM. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996;335:909–918. doi:10.1056/NEJM199609263351301.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sarr MG, Fishman EK, Milligan FD, Siegelman SS, Cameron JL. Pancreatitis or duodenal perforation after peri-Vaterian therapeutic endoscopic procedures: Diagnosis, differentiation, and management. Surgery 1986;100:461–466.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Booth FV, Doerr RJ, Khalafi RS, Luchette FA, Flint LM Jr. Surgical management of complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy with precut papillotomy. Am J Surg 1990;159:132–135. discussion 135–6. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80618-X.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Preetha M, Chung YF, Chan WH, Ong HS, Chow PK, Wong WK, Ooi LL, Soo KC. Surgical management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations. ANZ J Surg 2003;73:1011–1014. doi:10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.t01-15-.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Safrany L. Duodenoscopic sphincterotomy and gallstone removal. Gastroenterology 1977;72:338–343.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Byrne P, Leung JW, Cotton PB. Retroperitoneal perforation during duodenoscopic sphincterotomy. Radiology 1984;150:383–384.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fatima J, Baron TH, Topazian MD, Houghton SG, Iqbal CW, Ott BJ, Farley DR, Farnell MB, Sarr MG. Pancreaticobiliary and duodenal perforations after periampullary endoscopic procedures: Diagnosis and management. Arch Surg 2007;142:448–454. discussion 454–5. doi:10.1001/archsurg.142.5.448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Howard TJ, Tan T, Lehman GA, Sherman S, Madura JA, Fogel E, Swack ML, Kopecky KK. Classification and management of perforations complicating endoscopic sphincterotomy. Surgery 1999;126:658–663. discussion 664–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stapfer M, Selby RR, Stain SC, Katkhouda N, Parekh D, Jabbour N, Garry D. Management of duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy. Ann Surg 2000;232:191–198. doi:10.1097/00000658-200008000-00007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bell RC, Van Stiegmann G, Goff J, Reveille M, Norton L, Pearlman NW. Decision for surgical management of perforation following endoscopic sphincterotomy. Am Surg 1991;57:237–240.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Genzlinger JL, McPhee MS, Fisher JK, Jacob KM, Helzberg JH. Significance of retroperitoneal air after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:1267–1270. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.00996.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kayhan B, Akdogan M, Sahin B. ERCP subsequent to retroperitoneal perforation caused by endoscopic sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;60:833–835. doi:10.1016/S0016-5107(04)02171-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Scarlett PY, Falk GL. The management of perforation of the duodenum following endoscopic sphincterotomy: A proposal for selective therapy. Aust N Z J Surg 1994;64:843–846. doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.1994.tb04561.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mutignani M, Iacopini F, Dokas S, Larghi A, Familiari P, Tringali A, Costamagna G. Successful endoscopic closure of a lateral duodenal perforation at ERCP with fibrin glue. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;63:725–727. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2005.11.028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cameron JL, Kieffer RF, Hendrix TR, Mehigan DG, Baker RR. Selective nonoperative management of contained intrathoracic esophageal disruptions. Ann Thorac Surg 1979;27:404–408.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Berne TV, Donovan AJ. Nonoperative treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer. Arch Surg 1989;124:830–832.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cobb LM, Vinocur CD, Wagner CW, Weintraub WH. Intestinal perforation due to blunt trauma in children in an era of increased nonoperative treatment. J Trauma 1986;26:461–463. doi:10.1097/00005373-198605000-00009.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sarli L, Porrini C, Costi R, Regina G, Violi V, Ferro M, Roncoroni L. Operative treatment of periampullary retroperitoneal perforation complicating endoscopic sphincterotomy. Surgery 2007;142:26–32. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2007.02.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wook Hwan Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, J.H., Yoo, B.M., Kim, J.H. et al. Management of ERCP-Related Perforations: Outcomes of Single Institution in Korea. J Gastrointest Surg 13, 728–734 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0786-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0786-2

Keywords

Navigation