Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 19–25 | Cite as

Comparison of Surgically Resected Polypoid Lesions of the Gallbladder to their Pre-operative Ultrasound Characteristics

  • Martin D. Zielinski
  • Thomas D. Atwell
  • Peyton W. Davis
  • Michael L. Kendrick
  • Florencia G. Que
Article

Abstract

Background

Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder (PLG) have been a common finding on ultrasound examinations of the abdomen and are more prevalent since our use of equipment incorporating pulse shaping increased bandwidth, and enhanced phase use for image reconstruction began in 1996. Our study correlates the pre-operative ultrasonographic findings of these lesions to the surgically resected specimen with specific regard to identifying neoplastic polyps.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed of 130 patients who had a pre-operative ultrasound of the gallbladder and subsequently underwent cholecystectomy between August 1996 and July 2007 at the Mayo Clinic Rochester.

Results

Seventy-nine pseudopolyps (cholesterol polyps, inflammatory polyps, and adenomyomas) and 15 neoplastic polyps were identified on histopathologic analysis. However, 36 patients (27%) did not have a PLG upon histopathologic analysis. Thirty-one polyps had suspicious ultrasonographic characteristics for neoplastic changes. Twenty-nine were ≥10 mm, 12 had vascularity, and one demonstrated invasion. Of these, there were 23 pseudopolyps and six true polyps with neoplastic changes on final pathology (four dysplastic adenomas and two adenocarcinomas). Three asymptomatic polyps ≤10 mm (4%) in maximum diameter based on pre-operative ultrasound imaging (US) had neoplastic changes at pathology (two dysplastic adenomas and one adenocarcinoma). Several statistically significant risk factors were identified that increased the likelihood for malignancy in a PLG: history of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), local invasion, vascularity, and ≥6 mm maximum diameter based on pre-operative US. Of PLGs ≤10 mm, 7.4% were neoplastic. Twenty-five patients were followed up with at least two serial ultrasound examinations. Of these, seven demonstrated polyp growth. None of these specimens demonstrated neoplastic changes. The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for ultrasound diagnosing neoplastic changes based on current criteria was 28.5% and 93.1%, respectively, with a false negative rate of 5.0%. Expanding the criteria to include cholecystectomy for PLGs ≥ 6 mm changes the positive predictive value and negative predictive value to 18.5% and 100%, respectively, with a false negative rate of 0%.

Conclusion

Histopathologic analysis of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder continues to be the gold standard to identify malignancy. Ultrasound has been used extensively in the pre-operative management of these lesions, but modern ultrasound techniques are unable to differentiate between benign and malignant PLGs with any certainty. We recommend that strong consideration be given to surgical resection of PLGs ≥ 6 mm based on pre-operative US due to the significant risk of neoplasm. Additionally, PLGs in all patients with PSC, any patient in whom diligent long-term follow-up cannot be completed, and lesions that demonstrate growth, vascularity, invasion, or are symptomatic require cholecystectomy.

Keywords

Polyps Gallbladder Ultrasound Adenocarcinoma Adenoma to carcinoma sequence 

References

  1. 1.
    Bergdahl L. Gallbladder carcinoma first diagnosed at microscopic examinations of gallbladders removed for presumed benign disease. Ann Surg. 1980;191:19–22. doi:10.1097/00000658-198001000-00004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yamaguchi K, Enjoji M. Carcinoma of the gallbladder: a clinicopathology of 103 patients and a newly proposed staging. Cancer. 1988;62:1425–1432. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19881001)62:7<1425::AID-CNCR2820620730>3.0.CO;2-T.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shirai Y, Yoshida K, Tsukada K, Muto T. Inapparent carcinoma of the gallbladder: an appraisal of a radical second look operation after simple cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 1992;215:326–331. doi:10.1097/00000658-199204000-00004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bivins BA, Meeker WA, Weiss DL, Griffen WO. Carcinoma is situ of the gallbladder: a dilemma. Soutern Med J. 1975;68:297–300.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Okamoto M, Okamoto H, Kitahara F, Kobayashi K, Karikome K, Miura K et al. Ultrasonographic evidence of association of polyps and stones with gallbladder cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94(2):446–450. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.875_d.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kozuka S, Tsubone M, Yasui A, Hachisuka K. Relation of adenoma to carcinoma in the gallbladder. Cancer. 1982;50:2226–2234. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19821115)50:10<2226::AID-CNCR2820501043>3.0.CO;2-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aldridge MC, Bismuth H. Gallbladder cancer: the polyp-cancer sequence. Br J Surg. 1990;77(4):363–364. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800770403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meyers RP, Shaffer EA, Beck PL. Gallbaldder polyps: epidemiology, natural history and management. Can J Gastroenterol. 2002;16:187–194.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Terzi C, Sokmen S, Seckin S, Albayrak L, Ugurlu M. Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: report of 100 cases with special reference to operative indications. Surgery. 2000;127:622–627. doi:10.1067/msy.2000.105870.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chattopadhyay D, Lochan R, Gopinath BR, Wynne KS. Outcome of gallbladder polypoidal lesions detected by transabdominal ultrasound scanning: a nine year experience. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11(14):2171–2173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sadamoto Y, Oda S, Tanaka M, Harada N, Kubo H, Eguchi T et al. A useful approach to the differential diagnosis of small polypoid lesions pf the gallbladder, utilizing an endoscopic ultrasound scoring system. Endoscopy. 2002;34(12):959–965. doi:10.1055/s-2002-35859.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Akatsu T, Aiura K, Shimazu M, Ueda M, Wakabyashi G, Tanabe M et al. Can endoscopic ultrasonography differentiate non lastic from neoplastic gallbladder polyps? Dig Dis Sci. 2006;51(2):416–421. doi:10.1007/s10620-006-3146-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Choi WB, Lee SK, Kim MH, Seo DW, Kim HJ, Kim DI et al. A new strategy to predict the neoplastic polyps of the gallbladder based on a scoring system using EUS. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:372–379. doi:10.1067/mge.2000.108041.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Numata K, Oka H, Morimoto M, Sugimori K, Kunisaki R, Nihonmatsu H et al. Differential diagnosis of gallbladder diseases with contrast-enhanced harmonic gray scale ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2007;26:763–774.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koga A, Watanabe K, Fukuyama T, Takiguchi S, Nakayama F. Diagnosis and operative indications for polypoid lesions of the gallbladder. Arch Surg. 1988;123(1):26–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yang HL, Sun YG, Wang Z. Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: diagnosis and indications for surgery. Br J Surg. 1992;79:227–229. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800790312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kubota K, Bandai Y, Noie T, Ishizaki Y, Masanori T, Makuuchi M. How should polypoid lesions of the gallbladder be treated in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Surgery. 1995;117(5):481–487. doi:10.1016/S0039-6060(05)80245-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ishikawa O, Ohhigashi H, Imaoka S et al. The difference in malignancy between pedunculated and sessile polypoid lesions of the gallbladder. Am J Gastroenterol. 1988;84:1386–1390.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sugiyama M, Atomi Y, Kuroda A, Muto T, Wada N. Large cholesterol polyps of the gallbladder: diagnosis by means of US and endoscopic US. Radiology. 1995;196:493–497.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moriguchi H, Tazawa J, Hayashi Y, Takenawa H, Nakayama E, Marumo F et al. Natural history of polypoid lesions in the gall bladder. Gut. 1996;39:860–862. doi:10.1136/gut.39.6.860.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Csendes A, Burgos AM, Csendes P, Smok G, Rojas J. Late follow-up of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder smaller than 10 mm. Ann Surg. 2004;234(5):657–660. doi:10.1097/00000658-200111000-00011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Collett JA, Allan RB, Chisholm RJ, Wilson IR, Burt MJ, Chapman BA. Gallbladder polyps: prospective study. J Ultrasound Med. 1998;17:207–211.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tsuchiya Y, Uchimura M. collective review of 503 cases of small polypoid lesions (less than 20 mm in maximum diameter) of the gallbladder: size distribution in various diseases and the depth of carcinomatous invasion. Jpn J Gastroenterol. 1986;83:2086–2087. Japanese.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sun XJ, Shi JS, Han Y, Wang JS, Ren H. Diagnosis and treatment of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: report of 194 cases. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2004;3:591–594.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Adamsen S, Hansen OH, Funch-Jensen P, Schulze S, Stage JG, Wara P. Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective nationwide series. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;184(6):571–578.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tublin ME. Question and answer. AJR. 2001;177:467.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mangel AW. Management of gallbladder polyps. South Med J. 1997;90(5):481–483.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Inoue T, Kitano M, Kudo M, Sakamoto H, Kawasaki T, Maekawa YC. Diagnosis of gallbladder diseases by contrast-enhanced phase-inversion harmonic ultrasonography. US Med Biol. 2007;33:353–361. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin D. Zielinski
    • 1
  • Thomas D. Atwell
    • 2
  • Peyton W. Davis
    • 1
  • Michael L. Kendrick
    • 1
  • Florencia G. Que
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Gastrointestinal and General SurgeryMayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyMayo ClinicRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations