Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Management of Appendiceal Mass: Controversial Issues Revisited

  • review article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Purpose

Although appendix mass occurs in 10% of patients with acute appendicitis, its surgical management is surrounded with controversy. This article reviews some of the controversial issues in the management of appendix mass.

Methods

A search of the English literature was conducted for “appendiceal mass,” “interval appendicectomy,” and “laparoscopic appendicectomy” and manual cross-referencing.

Results and Conclusion

The majority of the studies were small and retrospective. Emergency appendicectomy for appendix mass is emerging as an alternative to conventional conservative treatment. It is feasible, safe, and cost-effective, allowing early diagnosis and treatment of unexpected pathology. However, the appropriate timing for emergency surgery is not clear. After successful conservative management, interval appendicectomy is not necessary and can safely be omitted, except in patients with recurrent symptoms. In patients over 40 years of age, other pathological causes of right iliac mass must be excluded by further investigations (colonoscopy and computerized tomography scan), and a close follow-up is needed. Laparoscopic appendicectomy whether in emergency or interval settings is feasible and safe and should replace the conventional open method. Large prospective, randomized controlled trials are lacking, and therefore, such trials are needed to scientifically compare emergency surgery vs conservative management without interval appendicectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shipsey MR, O’Donnell B. Conservative management of appendix mass in children. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1985;67:23–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Willemsen PJ, Hoorntje LE, Eddes EH, Ploeg RJ. The need for interval appendectomy after resolution of an appendiceal mass questioned. Dig Surg. 2002;19:216–220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nitecki S, Assalia A, Schein M. Contemporary management of the appendiceal mass. Br J Surg. 1993;80:18–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahmed I, Deakin D, Parsons SL. Appendix mass: do we know how to treat it. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005;87(3):191–195.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Corfield L. Interval appendicectomy after appendiceal mass or abscess in adults: what is “best practice”. Surg Today. 2007;37(1):1–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ochsner AJ. The cause of diffuse peritonitis complicating appendicitis and its prevention. JAMA. 1901;26:1747–1754.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Oliak D, Yamini D, Udani V, et al. Initial nonoperative management for periappendiceal abscess. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:936–941.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Skoubo-Kristensen E, Hvid I. The appendiceal mass: results of conservative treatment. Ann Surg. 1982;196(5):584–587.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bagi P, Duetolm S. Nonoperative management of the ultrasonically evaluated appendiceal mass. Surgery. 1987;101:602–605.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoffmann J, Lindhard A, Jensen HE. Appendix mass: conservative management without interval appendectomy. Am J Surg. 1984;148:379–382.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedell, Perez-Izqierdo. Is there a role of I.A. in the management of acute appendicitis. Am Surg. 2000;66:1158–1162.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gillick J, Velayudham M, Puri P. Conservative management of appendix mass in children. Br J Surg. 2001;88(11):1539–1542.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Erdogan D, Karaman I, Narci A, et al. Comparison of two methods for the management of appendicular mass in children. Pediatr Surg Int. 2005;21(2):81–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tingstedt B, Bexe-Lindskog E, Ekelund M, Andersson R. Management of appendiceal masses. Eur J Surg. 2002;168:579–582.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bleker RJ, Wereldsma JC. Colonic malignancy mimicking an appendiceal mass. Neth J Surg. 1989;41:42–46.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vakili C. Operative treatment of appendix mass. Am J Surg. 1976;131:312–314.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Foran B, Berne TV, Rosoff L. Management of the appendiceal mass. Arch Surg. 1978;113:1144–1145.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Marya SK, Garg P, Singh M, Gupta AK, Singh Y. Can J Surg. 1993;36(3):268–270.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Samuel M, Hosie G, Holmes K. Prospective evaluation of nonsurgical versus surgical management of appendiceal mass. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37:882–886.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. De U, Ghosh S. Acute appendicectomy for appendicular mass: a study of 87 patients. Ceylon Med J. 2002;47(4):117–118.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Senapathi PS, Bhattacharya D, Ammori BJ. Early laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicular mass. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1783–1785.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Goh BK, Chui CH, Yap TL, et al. Is early laparoscopic appendectomy feasible in children with acute appendicitis presenting with an appendiceal mass? A prospective study. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40(7):1134–1137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Poon RT, Chu KW. Inflammatory cecal masses in patients presenting with appendicitis. World J Surg. 1999;23:713–716.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kumar S, Jain S. Treatment of appendiceal mass: prospective randomized clinical trail. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2004;23(5):165–167.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen C, Botelho C, Cooper A, Hibberd P, Parsons S. Current practice patterns in the treatment of perforated appendicitis in children. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196:212–221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Eriksson S, Styrud J. Interval appendicectomy: a retrospective study. Eur J Surg. 1998;164:771–774.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Thomas DR. Conservative management of the appendix mass. Surgery. 1973;73(5):677–680.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Adalla SA. Appendiceal mass: interval appendicectomy should not be the rule. Br J Clin Pract. 1996;50(3):168–169.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Karaca I, Altintoprak Z, Karkiner A, Temir G, Mir E. The management of appendiceal mass in children: is interval appendectomy necessary. Surg Today. 2001;31(8):675–677.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ein SH, Shandling B. Is interval appendectomy necessary after rupture of an appendiceal mass. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31(6):849–850.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lai HW, Loong CC, Chiu JH, Chau GY, Wu CW, Lui WY. Interval appendectomy after conservative treatment of an appendiceal mass. World J Surg. 2006;30(3):352–357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lai HW, Loong CC, Wu CW, Lui WY. Watchful waiting versus interval appendectomy for patients who recovered from acute appendicitis with tumor formation: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Chin Med Assoc. 2005;68(9):431–434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kaminsk AI, Liu I-LA, Applebaum H, Lee L, Haigh PI. Routine interval appendectomy is not justified after initial nonoperative treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg. 2005;140:897–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gahukamble DB, Gahukamble LD. Surgical and pathological basis for interval appendicectomy after resolution of appendicular mass in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35:424–427.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Pickhardt PJ, Levy AD, Rohrmann CA, Kende AI. Primary neoplasms of the appendix manifesting as acute appendicitis: CT findings with pathologic comparison. Radiology. 2002;224(3):775–781.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Horwitz JR, Custer MD, May BH, Mehall JR, Lally KP. Should laparoscopic appendectomy be avoided for complicated appendicitis in children. J Pediatr Surg. 1997;32(11):1601–1603.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lintula H, Kokki H, Vanamo K, Antila P, Eskelinen M. Laparoscopy in children with complicated appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37(9):1317–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Vargas HI, Averbook A, Stamos MJ. Appendiceal mass: conservative therapy followed by interval laparoscopic appendectomy. Am Surg. 1994;60(10):753–758.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Nguyen DB, Silen W, Hodin RA. Interval appendectomy in the laparoscopic era. J Gastrointest Surg. 1999;3(2):189–193.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Gibeily GJ, Ross MN, Manning DB, Wherry DC, Kao TC. Late-presenting appendicitis: a laparoscopic approach to a complicated problem. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(5):725–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Owen A, Moore O, Marven S, Roberts J. Interval laparoscopic appendectomy in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2006;16(3):308–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Stoltzing H, Thon K. Perforated appendicitis: is laparoscopic operation advisable. Dig Surg. 2000;7:610–616.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Andersson R, Lambe M, Bergström R. Fertility patterns after appendicectomy: historical cohort study. BMJ. 1999;318:963–967.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgical Specialties, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, 34111, Saudi Arabia

    Abdul-Wahed N. Meshikhes

Authors
  1. Abdul-Wahed N. Meshikhes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdul-Wahed N. Meshikhes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meshikhes, AW.N. Management of Appendiceal Mass: Controversial Issues Revisited. J Gastrointest Surg 12, 767–775 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0399-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0399-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation