Abstract
Pancreatic cystic lesions are being increasingly identified. Clinical decision making is driven by the differential diagnosis of the cyst and, for the asymptomatic patient, its likelihood of causing harm. The fundamental issue is whether the cyst is neoplastic, and, if so, what is its risk for malignant degeneration. High-resolution computed tomography provides detailed information about cyst structure and may facilitate differentiation from mucin-secreting tumors of the pancreas. Magnetic resonance imaging has the potential added advantage of determining communication between the cyst and pancreatic duct. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) imaging provides additional characterization of the lesion. While EUS morphology alone has limitations regarding definitive diagnosis, aspiration, and characterization of cyst, fluid contents may provide incremental information. Aspiration is well tolerated and safe, with a complication rate of less than 1%. In the absence of a history of pancreatitis, pseudocyst is quite unlikely, and the concern of a cystic neoplasm is paramount. In general, all symptomatic lesions should proceed to appropriate surgical resection. If preoperative characterization of the lesion will change management, EUS + FNA for cytology and fluid analysis (CEA) may characterize the lesion as mucinous, although cytology alone is rarely definitive. For those patients with benign-appearing lesions, such as classic appearance of a serous cystadenoma, observation alone seems appropriate. In some circumstances, EUS + FNA confirmation of a negative cytology and low fluid CEA can further provide evidence to support a monitoring approach and deferral of surgical intervention.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fernandez-del Castillo C, Targarona J, Thayer SP, Rattner DW, Brugge WR, Warshaw AL. Incidental pancreatic cysts: clinicopathologic characteristics and comparison with symptomatic patients. Arch Surg 2003;138:427–434.
Brugge WR, Lauwers GY, Sahani D, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Warshaw AL. Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1218–1226.
Sperti C, Pasquali C, Constantino V, Perasole A, Liessi G, Pedrazzoli S. Solitary true cyst of the pancreas in adults. Report of three cases and review of literature. Int J Pancreatol 1995;18(2):161–167.
Buetow PC, Rao P, Thompson LD. Mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: radiologic–pathologic correlation. Radiographics 1998;18:433–449.
Brugge WR. The role of EUS in the diagnosis of cystic lesions of the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52(6):S18–S22.
Ahmad NA, Kochman ML, Lewis JD, Ginsberg GG. Can EUS alone differentiate between malignant and benign cystic lesions of the pancreas? Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:3295–3300.
Kaneto H, Endo T, Ozeki I, et al. Macrocystic serous cystadenoma of the pancreas: importance of co-existent tiny cysts depicted by EUS. J Gastroenterol 2000;35:472–475.
Ligneau B, Lombard-Bohas C, Partensky C, et al. Cystic tumors of the pancreas. Clinical, radiologic, and histopathologic features in 13 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2001;25(6):752–760.
Levy MJ, Clain JE. Evaluation and management of cystic pancreatic tumors: emphasis on the role of EUS FNA. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;2(8):639–653.
Brugge WR, Lewandrowski K, Lee-Lewandrowski E, et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a report of the Cooperative Pancreatic Cyst Study. Gastroenterology 2004;126:1330–1336.
Khalid A, Nodit L, Zahid M, Bauer K, Brody D, Finkelstein SD, McGrath KM. Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspirate DNA analysis to differentiate malignant and benign pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101(11):2493–2500.
Scheiman JM. Cystic lesion of the pancreas. Gastroenterol 2005;128:463–469.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0562-3
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scheiman, J.M. Management of Cystic Lesions of the Pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg 12, 405–407 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0350-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0350-5