Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysis of Anal Sphincter Preservation Rate According to Tumor Level and Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer Patients

  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

The anal sphincter preservation rate (ASPR) according to tumor level and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherpy (CRT) has not been fully evaluated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between the tumor level, neoadjuvant CRT, and the ASPR in rectal cancer patients. We studied 544 patients (tumor level, 0–6 cm) who underwent curative resection for rectal cancer between 1991 and 2005. Patients were divided six into groups according to tumor level over 1-cm intervals, and the ASPR was evaluated in patients with and without neoadjuvant CRT according to tumor level. Sphincter preservation surgery was performed in 191 patients, and 86 patents underwent neoadjuvant CRT. The overall ASPR was 43.0% (37/86) in patients with neoadjuvant CRT and 33.6% (154/458) in patients without neoadjuvant CRT (P = 0.094). In an analysis according to tumor level, the ASPR was 0.0 vs 0.0% in ≤1 cm, 0.0 vs 2.1% in 1 ≤ 2 cm (P = 0.589), 11.8 vs 16.8% in 2 ≤ 3 cm (P = 0.599), 55.6 vs 20.2% in 3 ≤ 4 cm (P = 0.001), 57.7 vs 45.9% in 4 ≤ 5 cm (P = 0.227), and 66.7 vs 69.5% in 5 ≤ 6 cm (P = 0.827). Neoadjuvant CRT did not increase the ASPR in tumor level within ≤6 cm. However, for the tumor level (3 ≤ 4 cm), neoadjuvant CRT significantly increased the ASPR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miles WE. A method of performing abdomino-perineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and the terminal portion of the pelvic colon. Lancet 1908;2:1812.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rothengerger DA, Wong WD. Abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma of the low rectum. World J Surg 1992;16:478–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Karanjiia ND, Schache DJ, North WR, Heald RJ. “Close shave” in anterior resection. Br J Surg 1990;77:510–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lavery IC, Lopez-Kostner F, Fazio VW, Fernandez-Martin M, Milsom JW, Church JM. Chances of cure are not compromised with sphincter-saving procedures for cancer of the lower third of the rectum. Surgery 1997;122:779–785.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen Z, Myers E, Langer B, Taylor B, Railton RH, Jamieson C. Double stapling technique for low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:231–235.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Marks G, Mohiuddin M, Masoni L. The reality of radical sphincter preservation surgery for cancer of the distal 3 cm rectum following high-dose radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993;27:779–783.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rouanet P, Fabre JM, Dubois JB, et al. Conservative surgery for low rectal carcinoma after high-dose radiation. Functional and oncologic results. Ann Surg 1995;221:67–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wagman R, Minsky BD, Cohen AM, Saltz L, Paty PB, Guillem JG. Sphincter preservation in rectal cancer with preoperative radiation therapy and coloanal anastomosis: long-term follow-up. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998;40:569–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tytherleight MG, McC Mortensen NJ. Options for sphincter preservation in surgery for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2003;90:922–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial. Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in respectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1997;336:980–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim DW, Lim SB, Kim DY, et al. Pre-operative chemo-radiotherapy improves the sphincter preservation rate in patients with rectal cancer located within 3 cm of the anal verge. Eur J Surg Oncol 2006;32:162–167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Crane CH, Skibber JM, Feig BW, et al. Response to preoperative chemoradiation increase the use of sphincter-preserving surgery in patients with locally advanced low rectal carcinoma. Cancer 2003;97:517–523.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rodel C, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1731–1740.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Baik SH, Kim NK, Lee KY, Sohn SK, Cho CH. Hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis for distal rectal cancer: long-term clinical outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 2005;9:775–780.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kirwan WO, Turnbull RB Jr, Fazio VW, Weakley FL. Pullthrough operation with delayed anastomosis for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1978;65:695–698.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection: histopathological study of lateral tumor spread and surgical excision. Lancet 1986;2:996–999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Baik SH, Kim NK, Lee YC, et al. Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:462–469.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grann A, Minsky BD, Cohen AM, et al. Preliminary results of preoperative 5 fluorouracil, low dose leucovorin and concurrent radiation therapy for clinically resectable T3 rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:515–522.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Medich D, McGinty J, Parda D, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery for locally advanced distal rectal adenocarcinoma: Pathologic findings and clinical implications. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:1123–1128.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Janjan NA, Khoo VS, Abbruzzese J, et al. Tumor downstaging and sphincter preservation with preoperative chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: The M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999;44:1027–1038.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tepper JE, O’Connell M, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: Analysis of stage, sex, and local control-final report of intergroup 0114. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:1744–1750.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim JC, Kim TW, Kim JH, et al. Preoperative concurrent radiotherapy with capcitabine before total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;63:346–353.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hofheinz RD, Horisberger K, Woernle C, et al. Phase I trial of cetuximab in combination with capecitabine, weekly irinotecan, and radiotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;65:1384–1390.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gerard JP, Chapet O, Nemoz C, et al. Improved sphincter preservation in low rectal cancer with high-dose preoperative radiotherapy: The lyon R96-02 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:2404–2409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Saito N, Ono M, Sugito M, Ito M, et al. Early results of intersphincteric resection for patients with very low rectal cancer: an active approach to avoid a permanent colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:459–466.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a faculty research grant from Yonsei University College of Medicine for 2006 (No. 6-2006-0093).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang Hwan Cho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baik, S.H., Kim, N.K., Lee, K.Y. et al. Analysis of Anal Sphincter Preservation Rate According to Tumor Level and Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer Patients. J Gastrointest Surg 12, 176–182 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0254-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0254-4

Keywords

Navigation