Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic Management of Rectal Prolapse

  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Rectal prolapse can be a disabling condition for those affected. Treatment has historically been by transanal or abdominal approaches, with transanal approaches tending to have lower morbidity, and abdominal approaches having lower recurrence rates. With the advent of laparoscopy, many of the numerous described abdominal operations have been reported with a minimally invasive approach. Although few randomized data exist, laparoscopic operations appear to provide equal rectal fixation to open surgery, with less morbidity. Coexistent symtoms such as fecal incontinence and constipation must be evaluated before surgery, so that the operation can be tailored to the needs of the individual patient. Patients with severe constipation are often offered a concomitant sigmoid resection, although this does increase the potential for complications. Patients with incontinence, diarrhea, or otherwise normal function can be offered a rectopexy without resection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Delaney CP, Senagore AJ. Rectal prolapse. In Fazio VW, Church JM, Delaney CP eds. Current Therapy in Colon and Rectal Surgery, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, Mosby Inc., 2005, pp 131–134

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kim DS, Tsang CB, Wong WD, Lowry AC, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD. Complete rectal prolapse: evolution of management and results. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:460–466.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Delaney CP, Kiran RP, Senagore AJ, Brady K, Fazio VW. Case matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colectomy. Ann Surg 2003;238:67–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Senagore AJ, Delaney CP. A critical analysis of laparoscopic colectomy at a single institution: lessons learned after 1000 cases. Am J Surg 2006;191(3):377–380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Madbouly K, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Duepree HJ, Brady KM, Fazio VW. Clinically based management of rectal prolapse: a comparison of laparoscopic Well’s procedure versus resection rectopexy. Surg Endosc 2003;17:99–103.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Himpens J, Cadiere GB, Bruyns J, Vertruyen M. Laparoscopic rectopexy according to Wells. Surg Endosc 1999;13:139–141.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kariv Y, Delaney CP, Casillas S, Hammel J, Nocero J, Bast J, Brady K, Fazio VW, Senagore AJ. Long-term outcome after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal prolapse. Surg Endosc 2006;20:35–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sullivan ES, Longaker CJ, Lee PY. Total pelvic mesh repair: a ten-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:857–863.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hool GR, Hull TR, Fazio VW. Surgical treatment of recurrent complete rectal prolapse: a thirty-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:270–272.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Conor P. Delaney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Delaney, C.P. Laparoscopic Management of Rectal Prolapse. J Gastrointest Surg 11, 150–152 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0107-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0107-1

Keywords

Navigation