Skip to main content
Log in

Contrast-induced anaphylaxis: does it occur in the medical environment and is it being responded to appropriately?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze the appropriateness of primary response for anaphylaxis due to iodinated contrast media (ICM) or gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA).

Materials and methods

This retrospective study included all patients in whom intravenous contrast agents (five types of ICMs and four types of GBCAs) were administered at our hospital between April 2016 and September 2021. For the patients who developed anaphylaxis, we obtained data on the time records of contrast injection, anaphylaxis onset, and intramuscular adrenaline (epinephrine) administration.

Results

Of the 76,555 ICM and 30,731 GBCA administrations, anaphylaxis occurred in 49 cases (0.05%), and in 48 cases (98.0%) the onset was within 30 min after administration with widely distributed times (median, 7.5 min; interquartile range, 4.5–10.8 min; max, 26 min). Intramuscular adrenaline administration was performed in 43 cases (87.8%), and this was done within five minutes after the onset in 37 cases (75.5%). Only in 24 cases (49.0%), there were time records of both the onset and adrenaline administration (if performed).

Conclusion

Anaphylaxis occurred within 30 min after contrast injection in the majority of the cases, but times were widely distributed. Only in 75.5% of cases, appropriate primary treatment was performed, and the importance of keeping exact time records in patients’ charts should be re-emphasized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cha MJ, Kang DY, Lee W, Yoon SH, Choi YH, Byun JS, et al. Hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media: a multicenter study of 196 081 patients. Radiol Radiol Soc N Am. 2019;293:117–24.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese committee on the safety of contrast media. Radiology. 1990;175:621–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lasser EC, Lyon SG, Berry CC. Reports on contrast media reactions: analysis of data from reports to the US food and drug administration. Radiology. 1997;203:605–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Behzadi AH, Zhao Y, Farooq Z, Prince MR. Immediate allergic reactions to gadolinium-based contrast agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiol Radiol Soc N Am. 2018;286:471–82.

    Google Scholar 

  5. ACR Manual on Contrast Media 2021. Available at: https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/files/clinical-resources/contrast_media.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2022.

  6. Turner PJ, Worm M, Ansotegui IJ, El-Gamal Y, Rivas MF, Fineman S, et al. Time to revisit the definition and clinical criteria for anaphylaxis? World Allergy Organ J. 2019;12: 100066.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Turner PJ, Baumert JL, Beyer K, Boyle RJ, Chan CH, Clark AT, et al. Can we identify patients at risk of life-threatening allergic reactions to food? Allergy Eur J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;71:1241–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cardona V, Ansotegui IJ, Ebisawa M, El-Gamal Y, Fernandez Rivas M, Fineman S, et al. World allergy organization anaphylaxis guidance 2020. World Allergy Organ J. 2020;13:100472.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Masch WR, Wang CL, Davenport MS. Severe allergic-like contrast reactions: epidemiology and appropriate treatment. Abdom Radiol. 2016;41:1632–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pumphrey RSH. Lessons for management of anaphylaxis from a study of fatal reactions. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000;30:1144–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ornato JP, Doctor ML, Harbour LF, Peberdy MA, Overton J, Racht EM, et al. Synchronization of timepieces to the atomic clock in an urban emergency medical services system. Ann Emerg Med. 1998;31:483–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaye W, Mancini ME, Truitt TL. When minutes count—the fallacy of accurate time documentation during in-hospital resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2005;65:285–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ha SO, Kim DY, Sohn YD. Clinical characteristics of adverse reactions to nonionic low osmolality contrast media in patients transferred from the CT room to the emergency room. Springerplus SpringerOpen. 2016;5:1–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McDonald JS, Hunt CH, Kolbe AB, Schmitz JJ, Hartman RP, Maddox DE, et al. Acute adverse events following gadolinium-based contrast agent administration: a single-center retrospective study of 281 945 injections. Radiology. 2019;292:620–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang CL, Cohan RH, Ellis JH, Caoili EM, Wang G, Francis IR. Frequency, outcome, and appropriateness of treatment of nonionic iodinated contrast media reactions. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:409–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Masch WR, Ellis JH, Wang CL, Cohan RH, Davenport MS. Effect of available intravenous access on accuracy and timeliness of epinephrine administration. Abdom Radiol. 2016;41:1133–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. ESUR Guidelines on Contrast Agents v10.0. Available at: https://www.esur.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/ESUR-Guidelines-10_0-Final-Version.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2022.

  18. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality AHRQ Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture: User’s Guide. https://www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/hospital/userguide/hospitalusersguide.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2022.

  19. Ito S, Seto K, Kigawa M, Fujita S, Hasagawa T, Hasegawa T. Development and applicability of hospital survey on patient safety culture (HSOPS) in Japan. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Recommendations for the prevention of recurrence of medical accidents Number 3 Analysis of deaths related to “Anaphylaxis caused by injections.” Japan Medical Safety Research Organization. 2018. Available at: https://www.medsafe.or.jp/uploads/uploads/files/teigen_03english.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2022.

  21. Anaphylaxis guidelines 2022. Japanese Society of Allergology; Available at: https://www.jsaweb.jp/uploads/files/Web_AnaGL_2022_1201.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2023.

  22. Ellis AK, Day JH. The role of epinephrine in the treatment of anaphylaxis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2003;3:11–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu YS, Kastner M, Harada L, Xu A, Salter J, Waserman S. Anaphylaxis-related deaths in Ontario: a retrospective review of cases from 1986 to 2011. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2014;10:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cochran ST, Bomyea K. Trends in adverse events from iodinated contrast media. Acad Radiol Elsevier. 2002;9:S65–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mortelé KJ, Oliva MR, Ondategui S, Ros PR, Silverman SG. Universal use of nonionic iodinated contrast medium for CT: evaluation of safety in a large urban teaching hospital. Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:31–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tubbs RJ, Murphy B, Mainiero MB, Shapiro M, Kobayashi L, Lindquist D, et al. High-fidelity medical simulation as an assessment tool for radiology residents’ acute contrast reaction management skills. J Am Coll Radiol. 2009;6:582–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Restauri N, Lio E, Glueck D, Lind KE, Sachs P, Vargas D, et al. Best practice for safe and effective administration of epinephrine for the treatment of anaphylaxis in the radiology department. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13:303–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim MH, Lee SY, Lee SE, Yang MS, Jung JW, Park CM, et al. Anaphylaxis to iodinated contrast media: clinical characteristics related with development of anaphylactic shock. PLoS One. 2014;9:e100154.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Park HJ, Son JH, Kim T-B, Kang MK, Han K, Kim EH, et al. Relationship between lower dose and injection speed of iodinated contrast material for CT and acute hypersensitivity reactions: an observational study. Radiology. 2019;293:565–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee S, Kang D, Kim J, Yoon S, Choi Y, Lee W, et al. Incidence and risk factors of immediate hypersensitivity reactions associated with low-osmolar iodinated contrast media: a longitudinal study based on a real-time monitoring system. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2019;29:444–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Yasuhiro Fukushima has an endowed chair provided by Siemens Healthineers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasuhiro Fukushima.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fukushima, Y., Suto, T., Hirasawa, H. et al. Contrast-induced anaphylaxis: does it occur in the medical environment and is it being responded to appropriately?. Jpn J Radiol 41, 1022–1028 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-023-01427-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-023-01427-w

Keywords

Navigation