Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnosis of appendiceal diverticulitis by multidetector computed tomography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Because appendiceal diverticulitis (AD) has a high risk of perforation, precise diagnosis is important for patients with suspected acute appendicitis (AA). In this study, we aimed to reveal the characteristics of computed tomography (CT) images of AD.

Methods

CT images were comparatively analyzed in patients who underwent appendectomy and had histopathologically proved AD (n = 23) or AA (n = 365) to reveal specific findings of CT image for AD and determine sensitivity and specificity of CT for AD.

Results

Univariate analysis showed that maximal diameter of the appendix in AD was significantly smaller than that in AA. Multivariate analysis showed that saccular structure of the appendix wall, cecum or ascending colon diverticulum and peri-appendiceal or -cecal fluid collection were significant independent indicators of AD. Based on that saccular structure of the appendix wall which was the most important specific finding, the sensitivity and specificity of CT for AD were 48% and 99%, respectively.

Conclusion

The saccular structure of the appendix wall, cecum or ascending colon diverticulum and peri-appendiceal or -cecal fluid collection in CT suggest AD in patients with suspected AA. The sensitivity and specificity of CT for diagnosing AD were 48% and 99%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yamada I, Kawamoto S, Inada K, Nagao S, Yoshida T, Yamashita Y. Clinical characteristics of 12 cases of appendiceal diverticulitis: a comparison with 378 cases of acute appendicitis. Surg Today. 2012;42:363–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yamada T, Fuchino Y, Nii K, Maki K, Tani H, Iwanaga S, et al. A Clinicopathological study on 9 cases of perforated appendiceal diverticulitis. J Abdomen Emerg Med. 2013;33:815–20.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sohn TJ, Chang YS, Kang JH, Kim DH, Lee TS, Han JK, et al. Clinical characteristics of acute appendiceal diverticulitis. J Korean Surg Soc. 2013;84:33–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee KH, Lee HS, Park SH, Bajpai V, Choi YS, Kang SH, et al. Appendiceal diverticulitis: Diagnosis and differentiation from usual acute appendicitis using computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007;31:763–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Osada H, Ohno H, Saiga K, Watanabe W, Okada T, Honda N. Appendiceal diverticulitis: multidetector CT features. Jpn J Radiol. 2012;30:242–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Heffernan DS, Saqib N, Terry M. A case of appendiceal diverticulitis, and a review of the literature. Ir J Med Sci. 2009;178:519–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamana I, Kawamoto S, Inada K, Nagao S, Yosida T, Yamashita Y. Clinical characteristics of 12 cases of appendiceal diverticulitis: a comparison with 378 cases of acute appendicitis. Surg Today. 2012;42:363–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Patil AY, Levine MS, Grujic E, Goren RA. Clinical and CT findings in appendiceal diverticulitis. Clin Imaging. 2014;38:350–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ito D, Miki K, Shimizu S, Hata S, Kobayashi K, Teruya M, et al. Clinical and computed tomography findings of appendiceal diverticulitis vs acute appendicitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:3921–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yardimci AH, Bektas CT, Pasaoglu E, Kinaci E, Ozer C, Sevinc MM, et al. Retrospective study of 24 cases of acute appendiceal diverticulitis: CT findings and pathological correlations. Jpn J Radiol. 2017;35:225–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ishikawa Y, Tulyeubai S, Furukawa A. Diagnosis of appendiceal lesions by CT. Stomach Intestine. 2014;49:484–93 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chiou YY, Pitman MB, Hahn PF, Kim YH, Phea JT, Mueller PR. Rare benign and malignant appendiceal lesions: spectrum of computed tomography findings with pathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003;27:297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kelynack TN. A contribution to the pathology of the vermiform appendix. London: HK Lewis; 1893.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Collins DC. A study of 50,000 specimens of the human vermiform appendix. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1955;101:437–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Abdullgaffar B. Diverticulosis and diverticulitis of the appendix. Int J Surg Pathol. 2009;17:231–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jin Y, Hasuo K, Yamada T, Han I, Kumazu Y, Maezawa Y, et al. A case of appendiceal diverticulitis diagnosed by preoperative Ultrasonography. Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg. 2012;45:766–71 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Takeda Y, Sugimura Y, Ogawa M, Baba Y, Hatakeyama G, Wakabayashi G. A case of appendiceal diverticulitis diagnosed preoperatively with MDCT and treated by laparoscopic appendicectomy. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 2009;70:3041–5 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Johnson PT, Horton KM, Kawamoto S, Eng J, Bean MJ, Shan SJ, et al. MDCT for suspected appendicitis: effect of reconstruction section thickness on diagnostic accuracy, rate of appendiceal visualization, and reader confidence using axial images. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:893–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Trollope M, Lindenuaer S. Diverticulosis of the appendix. Dis Colon Rectum. 1974;17:200–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ishikawa S, Kato J. Epidemiology of diverticular disease of the colon in Japan. J Jpn Soc Coloproctol. 2008;61:1010–4 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dupre MP, Jadavji I, Matshdes E, Urbanski SJ. Diverticular disease of the vermiform appendix: a diagnostic clue to underlying appendiceal neoplasm. Hum Pathol. 2008;39:1823–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Salminen P, Tuominen R, Paajanen H, Rautio T, Nordström P, Aarnio M, et al. Five-year follow-up of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in the APPAC randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;320:1259–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Podda M, Gerardi C, Cillara N, Fearnhead N, Gomes CA, Birindelli A, et al. Antibiotic Treatment and Appendectomy for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis in Adults and Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2019;270:1028–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norihiro Yuasa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical statement

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional review boards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fukata, K., Takamizawa, J., Miyake, H. et al. Diagnosis of appendiceal diverticulitis by multidetector computed tomography. Jpn J Radiol 38, 572–578 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-020-00950-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-020-00950-4

Keywords

Navigation