Abstract
Purpose
Alternative metrics (altmetrics) provides a complementary measure of the impact of scientific articles. The aim of this study was to identify and characterize the top 100 articles with the highest Altmetric attention score (AAS) in medical imaging journals.
Materials and methods
We searched for AASs articles published in 116 journals in the subject category “Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging” using the Web of Science. We determined the top 100 articles with the highest AAS using the Altmetric.com database, and then analyzed them with regard to the publishing journal, year, country of origin, type of article, subspecialty, main topic, and imaging technique.
Results
The top 100 articles were published in 18 imaging journals, led by Radiology (47%). These articles were published from 2016 to 2018 (94%). Most of the articles were from the United States (62%) and were original clinical studies (59%). The most common subspecialties and imaging technique of study were neuroimaging (30%) and MRI (35%). The main topics of articles were brain disease and function (30%).
Conclusion
Our study presents a detailed list and analysis of the top 100 articles with the highest AAS in imaging literature, which provides unique characteristics representing the public’s attention in this field.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AAS:
-
Altmetric attention score
- CT:
-
Computed tomography
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- PET:
-
Positron emission tomography
References
Uthman OA, Okwundu CI, Wiysonge CS, Young T, Clarke A. Citation classics in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: who wrote the top 100 most cited articles? PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e78517.
Eyre-Walker A, Stoletzki N. The assessment of science: the relative merits of post-publication review, the impact factor, and the number of citations. PLoS Biol. 2013;11:e1001675.
MacRoberts MH, MacRoberts BR. Problems of citation analysis: a critical review. J Am Soc Inform Sci. 1989;40:342–9.
Trueger NS, Thoma B, Hsu CH, Sullivan D, Peters L, Lin M. The altmetric score: a new measure for article-level dissemination and impact. Ann Emerg Med. 2015;66:549–53.
Citrome L. Moving forward with article level metrics: introducing altmetrics. Int J Clin Pract. 2015;69:811.
Thelwall M, Haustein S, Lariviere V, Sugimoto CR. Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e64841.
Kolahi J, Khazaei S. Altmetric: top 50 dental articles in 2014. Br Dent J. 2016;220:569–74.
Barbic D, Tubman M, Lam H, Barbic S. An analysis of altmetrics in emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;23:251–68.
Wang J, Alotaibi NM, Ibrahim GM, Kulkarni AV, Lozano AM. The spectrum of altmetrics in neurosurgery: the top 100 "trending" articles in Neurosurgical Journals. World Neurosurg. 2017;103(883–95):e1.
Kim HJ, Yoon DY, Kim ES, et al. The most mentioned neurointervention articles in online media: a bibliometric analysis of the top 101 articles with the highest altmetric attention scores. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11:528–32.
Kim ES, Yoon DY, Kim HJ, et al. The most mentioned neuroimaging articles in online media: a bibliometric analysis of the top 100 articles with the highest Altmetric Attention Scores. Acta Radiol. 2019;60:1680–6.
Kim JE, Kim Y, Park KM, Yoon DY, Bae JS. Top 100 publications as measured by altmetrics in the field of central nervous system inflammatory demyelinating disease. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:3748091.
de Oliveira-Szejnfeld PS, Levine D, Melo AS, et al. Congenital brain abnormalities and Zika virus: what the radiologist can expect to see prenatally and postnatally. Radiology. 2016;281:203–18.
Brigham TJ. An introduction to altmetrics. Med Ref Serv Q. 2014;33:438–47.
Brinjikji W, Klunder A, Kallmes DF. The 100 most-cited articles in the imaging literature. Radiology. 2013;269:272–6.
Franko OI. Twitter as a communication tool for orthopedic surgery. Orthopedics. 2011;34:873–6.
Alotaibi NM, Guha D, Fallah A, et al. Social media metrics and bibliometric profiles of neurosurgical departments and journals: is there a relationship? World Neurosurg. 2016;90(574):9.e7.
Kelly BS, Redmond CE, Nason GJ, Healy GM, Horgan NA, Heffernan EJ. The use of twitter by Radiology Journals: an analysis of twitter activity and impact factor. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13:1391–6.
Campbell FM. National bias: a comparison of citation practices by health professionals. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1990;78:376–82.
Rosenkrantz AB, Ayoola A, Singh K, Duszak R Jr. Alternative metrics ("Altmetrics") for assessing article impact in popular general Radiology Journals. Acad Radiol. 2017;24:891–7.
Costas R, Zahedi Z, Wouters P. Do, “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2015;66:2003–199.
O'Connor EM, Nason GJ, O'Kelly F, Manecksha RP, Loeb S. Newsworthiness vs scientific impact: are the most highly cited urology papers the most widely disseminated in the media? BJU Int. 2017;120:441–54.
Hoang JK, McCall J, Dixon AF, Fitzgerald RT, Gaillard F. Using social media to share your radiology research: how effective is a blog post? J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12:760–5.
Butler JS, Kaye ID, Sebastian AS, et al. The evolution of current research impact metrics: from bibliometrics to altmetrics? Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30:226–8.
Thelwall M. A brief history of altmetrics. Res Trends. 2014;37:3–4.
Barbaro A, Gentili D, Rebuffi C. Altmetrics as new indicators of scientific impact. J Eur Assoc Health Inf Libr. 2014;10(1):3–6.
Jobmann A, Hoffmann CP, Künne S, Peters I, Schmitz J, Wollnik-Korn G. Altmetrics for large, multidisciplinary research groups: comparison of current tools. Praxis Forschung. 2014;3:1–19.
Ortega JL. Reliability and accuracy of altmetric providers: a comparison among Altmetric.com PlumX and Crossref event data. Scientometrics. 2018;116:2123–38.
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All applicable institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Moon, J.Y., Yun, E.J., Yoon, D.Y. et al. Analysis of the altmetric top 100 articles with the highest altmetric attention scores in medical imaging journals. Jpn J Radiol 38, 630–635 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-020-00946-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-020-00946-0