Comparison of detectability of breast cancer by abbreviated breast MRI based on diffusion-weighted images and postcontrast MRI
- 224 Downloads
To compare the detectability of unenhanced abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and abbreviated postcontrast MRI for breast cancer.
The study population consisted of 87 patients undergoing breast MRI between December 2016 and March 2017 in a clinical setting. All breast MRIs were performed using a 1.5-T MRI scanner with a 16-channel breast radiofrequency coil. The abbreviated protocols based on DWI (AP1) and postcontrast MRI (AP2) were assessed independently by two radiologists. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed and the areas under the curves (AUCs) were compared between AP1 and AP2.
The study included 87 patients with 89 breast cancer lesions ≤ 2 cm in diameter. The sensitivity/specificity for AP1 and AP2 for reader 1 was 89.9/97.6% and 95.5/90.6%, respectively, and those for reader 2 was 95.5/94.1% and 98.9/94.1%, respectively. The AUCs for AP1 and AP2 for reader 1 were 0.9629 and 0.9640 (p = 0.95), respectively, and those for reader 2 were 0.9755 and 0.9843 (p = 0.46), respectively.
The detectability of the unenhanced abbreviated protocol based on DWI would be comparable to that of abbreviated postcontrast MRI for breast cancer.
KeywordsBreast neoplasms Magnetic resonance imaging Diffusion-weighted image Protocol Detection
We would like to thank Mr. Seiji Umano, the radiology technician who assisted with preparation of the image sets in the picture archiving and communication system server.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Takayuki Yamada: There is no conflict of interest to disclose with respect to the study. Yoshihide Kanemaki: There is no conflict of interest to disclose with respect to the study. Satoko Okamoto: There is no conflict of interest to disclose with respect to the study. Yasuo Nakajima: There is no conflict of interest to disclose with respect to the study.
This study was approved by our institutional review board.
- 4.Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Strobel K, Schild HH, Hilgers RD, Bieling HB. Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): first postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection—a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:2304–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Heacock L, Melsaether AN, Heller SL, Gao Y, Pysarenko KM, Babb JS, et al. Evaluation of a known breast cancer using an abbreviated breast MRI protocol: correlation of imaging characteristics and pathology with lesion detection and conspicuity. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85:815–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Sunami S, Kamitani S, Kawanami S, Setoguchi T, et al. Detection of non-palpable breast cancer in asymptomatic women by using unenhanced diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted MR imaging: comparison with mammography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:11–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar