Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Detection of unexpected emergency diseases using FDG-PET/CT in oncology patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the frequency of emergency diseases that were detected unexpectedly using FDG-PET/CT.

Materials and methods

Interpretation reports for 11,663 FDG-PET/CT studies in our hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with major emergency diseases were extracted according to the following exclusion criteria: (1) relevant findings had been recognized prior to the PET/CT; (2) an intervention or operation that may have been relevant to the present findings was performed within 1 month prior to the PET/CT; and (3) the clinical course could not be investigated sufficiently (e.g., in cases where the patients were introduced from other hospitals).

Results

Forty-one patients (0.35%) with unexpected emergency diseases were identified. The most frequent disease was pneumothorax (8 patients), followed by chronic subdural hematoma (CSH) (7 patients), ureteral stone (7 patients), and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with a dirty fat sign or a high-attenuation crescent sign visualized on CT (4 patients). Nine patients (2 pneumothorax, 3 CSH, 1 cerebral hemorrhage, 1 acute cholecystitis, 1 acute pancreatitis, and 1 acute appendicitis) were hospitalized and/or underwent therapeutic intervention within 1 week after the PET/CT.

Conclusion

Although rare, an unexpected emergency disease requiring urgent management can be detected using FDG-PET/CT in oncology patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1a–b
Fig. 2a–c
Fig. 3a–c
Fig. 4a–c

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nicherson J, Fairbank J, Ebert G. Incidental finding of subacute hematoma on PET/CT following cardiac cathetarization. Clin Nucl Med. 2007;32:456–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim DW, Kim MH, Kim CG. Incidental detection of urinary leakage on FDG PET/CT imaging for staging of gastric cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2016;41:217–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yamaga E, Tsunoda A, Kudo T, Toriihara A, Tateishi U. A case of incidental chronic subdural hematoma detected by FDG-PET/CT for evaluation of external auditory canal carcinoma. Nucl Med Clin. 2015;48:82–3 (Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hanna TN, Shekhani H, Zygmont ME, Kerchberger JM, Johnson JO. Incidental findings in emergency imaging: frequency, recommendations, and compliance with consensus guidelines. Emerg Radiol. 2016;23:169–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kelly ME, Heeney A, Redmond CE, Costelloe J, Nason GJ, Ryan J, et al. Incidental findings detected on emergency abdominal CT scans: a 1-year review. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40:1853–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fakler JK, Ozkurtul O, Josten C. Retrospective analysis of incidental non-trauma associated findings in severely injured patients identified by whole-body spiral CT scans. Patient Saf Surg. 2014;8:36. doi:10.1186/s13037-014-0036-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Rogers AJ, Maher CO, Schunk JE, Quayle K, Jacobs E, Lichenstein R, et al. Incidental findings in children with blunt head trauma evaluated with cranial CT scans. Pediatrics. 2013;132:e356–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bruzzi JF, Truong MT, Marom EM, et al. Incidental findings on integrated PET/CT that do not accumulate 18F-FDG. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:1116–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Osman MM, Cohade C, Fishman EK, et al. Clinically significant incidental findings on the unenhanced CT portion of PET/CT studies: frequency in 250 patients. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1352–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lumbreras B, Donat L, Hernandez-Aguado I. Incidental findings in imaging diagnostic tests: a systematic review. Br J Radiol. 2010;83:276–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Mehard WB, Heiken JP, Sicard GA. High-attenuating crescent in abdominal aortic aneurysm wall at CT: a sign of acute or impending rupture. Radiology. 1994;192:359–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sueyoshi E, Sakamoto I, Kawahara Y, Matsuoka Y, Hayashi K. Infected abdominal aortic aneurysm: early CT findings. Abdom Imaging. 1998;23:645–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Block J, Jardanov MI, Stack LB, Thurman RJ, editors. The atlas of emergency radiology. New York: McGraw Hill Education; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Krishnam MS, Curtis J, editors. Emergency radiology. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Soto JA, Lucey BC, editors. Emergency radiology: the requisites. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pope TL Jr, Harris JH Jr, editors. Harris & Harris’ the radiology of emergency medicine. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.

  17. Bobbio A, Dechartres A, Bouam S, et al. Epidemiology of spontaneous pneumothorax: gender-related differences. Thorax. 2015;70:653–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang W, Huang J. Chronic subdural hematoma: epidemiology and natural history. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2017;28:205–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Baechli H, Nordmann A, Bucher HC, Gratzl BO. Demographics and prevalent risk factors of chronic subdural haematoma: results of a large single-center cohort study. Neurosurg Rev. 2004;27:263–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jalalzadeh H, Indrakusuma R, Planken RN, Legemate DA, Koelemay MJW, Balm R. Inframmation as a predictor of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth and rupture: a systematic review of imaging biomarkers. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;52:333–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akira Toriihara.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

We have no grant funding nor any financial relationships to disclose.

Informed consent

Our institutional review board has approved this retrospective study, and the need for written informed consent was waived (IRB approval number: M2016-181).

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Toriihara, A., Yamaga, E., Nakadate, M. et al. Detection of unexpected emergency diseases using FDG-PET/CT in oncology patients. Jpn J Radiol 35, 539–545 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-017-0664-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-017-0664-5

Keywords

Navigation