Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in deviation of absorbed dose to water among users by chamber calibration shift

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The JSMP01 dosimetry protocol had adopted the provisional 60Co calibration coefficient \(N_{{{\text{D,w,Q}}_{ 0} }}^{{}}\), namely, the product of exposure calibration coefficient N C and conversion coefficient k D,X. After that, the absorbed dose to water D w standard was established, and the JSMP12 protocol adopted the \(N_{{{\text{D,w,Q}}_{ 0} }}^{{}}\) calibration. In this study, the influence of the calibration shift on the measurement of D w among users was analyzed.

Materials and methods

The intercomparison of the D w using an ionization chamber was annually performed by visiting related hospitals. Intercomparison results before and after the calibration shift were analyzed, the deviation of D w among users was re-evaluated, and the cause of deviation was estimated.

Results

As a result, the stability of LINAC, calibration of the thermometer and barometer, and collection method of ion recombination were confirmed. The statistical significance of standard deviation of D w was not observed, but that of difference of D w among users was observed between N C and \(N_{{{\text{D,w,Q}}_{ 0} }}^{{}}\) calibration.

Conclusion

Uncertainty due to chamber-to-chamber variation was reduced by the calibration shift, consequently reducing the uncertainty among users regarding D w. The result also pointed out uncertainty might be reduced by accurate and detailed instructions on the setup of an ionization chamber.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Papanikolaou N, Battista JJ, Boyer AL, Kappas C, Klein E, Mackie TR, et al. American association of physicists in medicine (AAPM) Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 65: Tissue inhomogeneity corrections for megavoltage photon beams: AAPM report No. 85. Madison: Medical Physics Publishing; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andreo P, Burns DT, Hohlfeld K, Huq, Knai T, Laitano F, et al. Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water: TRS-398 V.12. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Almond PR, Biggs PJ, Coursey BM, Hanson WF, Huq MS, Nath R, et al. AAPM’s TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Med Phys. 1999;26(9):1847–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nishidai T, editor. Standard dosimetry of absorbed dose in external beam radiotherapy. Tsusho Sangyo Kenkyu Sha: Tokyo; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Morishita Y, Kato M, Takata N, Kurosawa T, Tanaka T, Saito N. A standard for absorbed dose rate to water in a 60Co field using a graphite calorimeter at the National Metrology Institute of Japan. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2013;154(3):331–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Saitoh H, editor. Standard dosimetry of absorbed dose to water in external beam radiotherapy. Tsusho Sangyo Kenkyu Sha: Tokyo; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Okuyama H, Sakata S, Fukumura A, Mizuno H. The results of external dose audits for therapeutic high-energy X-rays by ANTM. Jpn J Med Phys. 2015;35(3):88.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sakata S, Chiryoyou senryokei kousei no jisseki. In: Association for Nuclear Technology in Medicine (ed). Therapy-Level Dosimetry Calibration 4. Tokyo: Association for Nuclear Technology in Medicine; 2014. p. 16–23.

  9. Das IJ, Cheng CW, Watts RJ, Ahnesjö A, Gibbons J, Li XA, et al. Accelerator beam data commissioning equipment and procedures: report of the TG-106 of the Therapy Physics Committee of the AAPM. Med Phys. 2008;35(9):4186–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Muir BR, Rogers DWO. Monte Carlo calculations of k Q, the beam quality conversion factor. Med Phys. 2010;37(11):5939–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yajima K, Suoh S, Katayose T, Yamashita W, Takase N, Fukumura A, et al. Comparison of absorbed dose to water calibration factors obtained from in air and in water calibration method. Jpn J Med Phys. 2013;33(3):117.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our colleagues and staff of the Radiation Therapy Department of Tokyo Metropolitan Hospitals for their cooperation. This work was partially supported by a JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (c) (Multi-year Fund) Number JP26460729.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tetsurou Katayose.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest associated with this manuscript.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Katayose, T., Saitoh, H., Igari, M. et al. Changes in deviation of absorbed dose to water among users by chamber calibration shift. Jpn J Radiol 35, 389–397 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-017-0644-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-017-0644-9

Keywords

Navigation