Abstract
Objective
To clarify the details of homogeneously enhancing lesions on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) and also to elucidate whether their differential diagnosis is possible.
Methods
Seventy-three homogeneously enhancing lesions on CEUS were retrospectively selected. Two radiologists first assessed conventional US findings alone in consensus to differentiate malignant vs. benign lesions. Then, qualitative and quantitative CEUS findings were analyzed to determine the useful findings for the differential diagnosis. Determined CEUS findings were applied to the indeterminate lesions based on conventional US findings to see whether CEUS can improve the diagnostic performance.
Results
There were 42 cancers (58 %) out of 73. Sensitivity and specificity using conventional US findings alone were 91 and 55 %, respectively. Among the CEUS findings tested, multivariate analysis revealed only the type 3 enhancement pattern, which indicates a larger enhancing area than the precontrast hypoechoic lesion, was related to malignancy (p < 0.05). By adding this information, however, no improvement was achieved in the diagnostic performance as determined by conventional US findings.
Conclusions
Approximately half of the homogeneously enhancing lesions on CEUS are malignant, and differentiation of malignant from benign lesions may be possible, at least to some extent, by meticulous assessment of the conventional US rather than CEUS findings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zhao H, Xu R, Ouyang Q, Chen L, Dong B, Huihua Y. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is helpful in the differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions. Eur J Radio. 2010;73:288–93.
Du J, Wang L, Wan CF, Hua J, Fang H, Chen J, Li FH. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast lesions: combined utility of conventional ultrasound and contrast enhanced ultrasound in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2012;33:3890–9.
Miyamoto Y, Ito T, Takada E, Omoto K, Hirai T, Moriyasu F. Efficacy of Sonazoid (Perflubutane) for contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differentiation of focal breast lesions: phase 3 multicenter clinical trial. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202:W400–7.
Liu H, Jiang YX, Liu JB, et al. Evaluation of breast lesions with contrast-enhanced ultrasound using the microvascular imaging technique: initial observations. Breast. 2008;17:532–9.
Liu H, Jiang YX, Liu JB, et al. Contrast-enhanced breast ultrasonography imaging features with histopathologic correlation. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28:911–20.
Wan CF, Du J, Fang H, et al. Evaluation of breast lesions by contrast enhanced ultrasound: qualitative and quantitative analysis. Eur J Radio. 2012;81:e444–50.
American College of Radiology. BI-RADSⓇ—ultrasound 2013. http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Resources/BIRADS/Ultrasound.
Ko KH, Hsu HH, Yu JC, et al. Non-mass-like breast lesions at ultrasonography: feature analysis and BI-RADS assessment. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:77–85.
Jiang YX, Liu H, Liu JB, et al. Breast tumor size assessment: comparison of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33:1873–81.
Du J, Li FH, Fang H, et al. Microvascular architecture of breast lesions; evaluation with contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic micro flow imaging. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27:833–42.
Li YJ, Men G, Wang Y, et al. Perfusion heterogeneity in breast tumors for assessment of angiogenesis. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32:1145–55.
Liu H, Jiang YX, Dai Q, et al. Peripheral enhancement of breast cancers on contrast-enhanced ultrasound: correlation with microvessel density and vascular endothelial growth factor expression. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014;40:293–9.
Acknowledgments
The authors sincerely thank Prof. Kazuki Nabeshima, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, for providing the pathological data and Prof. Akinori Iwasaki, Department of Thoracic, Endocrine and Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, for providing the patients’ clinical information.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
About this article
Cite this article
Fujimitsu, R., Shimakura, M., Urakawa, H. et al. Homogeneously enhancing breast lesions on contrast enhanced US: differential diagnosis by conventional and contrast enhanced US findings. Jpn J Radiol 34, 508–514 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-016-0549-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-016-0549-z