Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The effect of bladder contrast on dose calculation in volumetric modulated arc therapy planning in patients treated for postoperative prostate cancer

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of contrast agent on dose calculation in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in the post-prostatectomy setting.

Methods and material

Ten patients were studied. Each patient received planning computed tomography (CT) images with contrast agent. All of the plans were done on virtually simulated contrast-free CT scans. The plan approved by the radiation oncologist was replicated to the contrast CT series. In both of the plans the same monitor unit was used. The doses calculated from the two plans were compared in regard to target volumes and organs at risk. A paired sample t-test was used to evaluate the differences in cumulative dose volume histogram between the two plans.

Results

We showed that the use of contrast agent may cause significant differences in dose distribution. There was a significant decrease in doses received by planning target volume (PTV70), rectum V65 Gy, rectum V40 Gy, bladder V65 Gy, penile bulb V40 Gy in plans with contrast-enhanced CT sets. The decrease in mean, maximum and minimum doses received by PTV70 also contributed to the significant decrease in conformity index.

Conclusions

Using a contrast agent at the time of CT simulation may cause significant differences in dose distribution. For this reason, the plan should always be carried out on non-contrast CT data sets to avoid additional errors in the treatment planning process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Teh Bin S, Schroeder TM, Mai W-Y, Butler EB. Postoperative prostate cancer: overview. In: Mundt AJ, Roske JC, editors. Intensity modulated radiation therapy. Hamilton, London: BC Decker Inc; 2005. p. 449–58.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Valicenti RK, Sweet JW, Hauck WW, Hudes RS, Lee T, Dicker AP, et al. Variation of clinical target volume definition in three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;44:931–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Weber DC, Rouzaud M, Mirabell R. Bladder opacification does not significantly influence dose distribution in conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2001;59(1):95–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vanetti E, Nicolini G, Clivio A, Fogliata A, Cozzi L. The impact of treatment couch modelling on RapidArc. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54:157–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pulliam KB, Howell RM, Followill D, Luo D, White RA, Kry SF. The clinical impact of the couch top and rails on IMRT and arc therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:7435–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Feuvret L, Noel G, Mazeron JJ, Bey P. Conformity index: a review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64(2):333–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Otto K. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. Med Phys. 2008;35(1):310–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yabsantia S, Tangboonduangjit P, Tannanonta C. The effect of contrast agents on dose calculation in conformal radiotherapy planning using computed tomography for tumors at different anatomical regions. J Thai Soc Therap Radiol Oncol. 2010;16(2):23–7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shibamoto Y, Naruse A, Fukuma H, Ayakawa S, Sugie C, Tomita N. Influence of contrast materials on dose calculation in radiotherapy planning using computed tomography for tumors at various anatomical regions: a prospective study. Radiother Oncol. 2007;84(1):52–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rankine AW, Lanzon PJ, Spry NA. Effects of contrast media on megavoltage photon beam dosimetry. Med Dosimetry. 2008;33(3):169–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Elawadi AS, Bayoumi Y, Alomran R, El-Moniem RA, Ismail A, Alamro A. Does intravenous contrast agent affect dose calculations of three dimensional treatment planning system? Bull Alex Fac Med. 2009;45:103–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kimlin K, Mitchell J, Knight RT. Effects of iodinated contrast media on radiation therapy dosimetry for pathologies within the thorax. The Radiographer. 2006;53(2):30–4.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Choi Y, Kim JK, Lee HS, Hur WJ, Hong YS, Park S, et al. Influence of intravenous contrast agent on dose calculations of intensity modulated radiation therapy plans for head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2006;81(2):158–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Florence Nightingale Gayrettepe Hospital, Cemil Aslan Güder Sok 8, Floor-1, Gayrettepe, 34349, Istanbul, Turkey

    Tülay Ercan, Şefik İğdem & Gül Alço

Authors
  1. Tülay Ercan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Şefik İğdem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gül Alço
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tülay Ercan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ercan, T., İğdem, Ş. & Alço, G. The effect of bladder contrast on dose calculation in volumetric modulated arc therapy planning in patients treated for postoperative prostate cancer. Jpn J Radiol 34, 376–382 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-016-0523-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-016-0523-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation