Abstract
Rim enhancement is defined as enhancement that is more pronounced at the periphery of a mass. It can have varying appearances, ranging from a thin pattern to one that is thicker. This internal enhancement characteristic is an established characteristic of malignant lesions. Additionally, the use of combined descriptors, especially internal enhancement characteristics and the associated margin, can provide a more powerful predictive value than that of individual descriptors. The margin assessment of rim-enhancing masses is important and can vary in appearance from smooth to spiculated. Moreover, rim enhancement may be dynamic in that it changes appearance during the dynamic phases of contrast- enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (ce-MRI), and this feature can lead to confusion in the correct application of this lexicon. Rim-enhancing masses on ce-MRI are typically of two morphological types (i.e., a thin rim-enhancing mass with a smooth margin and a thick rim-enhancing mass with a spiculated margin). It is helpful to review and clarify the lexicon of rim enhancement using combined descriptors based on the pathological findings as doing so can help predict the likelihood of malignancy of ce-MRI lesions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Siegelman ES, Langlotz CP, Orel SG, Sullivan D, et al. Diagnostic performance characteristics of architectural features revealed by high spatial-resolution MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:409–415.
Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 2001;220:13–30.
Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke D, DeAngelis GA, DeBruhl N, Harms S, et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 2006;238:42–53.
American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system: magnetic resonance imaging (BI-RADS-MRI). 1st edn. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003.
Buadu LD, Murakami J, Murayama S, Hashiguchi N, Sakai S, Toyoshima S, et al. Patterns of peripheral enhancement in breast masses: correlation of findings on contrast medium enhanced MRI with histologic features and tumor angiogenesis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997;21:421–430.
Sherif H, Mahfouz AE, Oellinger H, Hadijuana J, Blohmer JU, Taupitz M, et al. Peripheral washout sign on contrastenhanced MR images of the breast. Radiology 1997;205:209–213.
Matsubayashi R, Matsuo Y, Edakuni G, Satoh T, Tokunaga O, Kudo S. Breast masses with peripheral rim enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: correlation of MR findings with histologic features and expression of growth factors. Radiology 2000;217:841–848.
Marklund M, Trop-Pedersen S, Bentzon N, Thomsen C, Roslind A, Nolsoe CP. Contrast kinetics of the malignant breast tumor-border versus center enhancement on dynamic midfield MRI. Eur J Radiol 2008;65:279–285.
Kobayashi M, Kawashima H, Matsui O, Zen Y, Suzuki M, Inokuchi M, et al. Two different types of ring-like enhancement on dynamic MR imaging in breast cancer: correlation with the histopathologic findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:1435–1443.
Lee SH, Cho N, Kim SJ, Cha JH, Cho KS, Ko ES, et al. Correlation between high resolution dynamic MR features and prognostic factors in breast cancer. Korean J Radiol 2008;9:10–18.
Uematsu T, Kasami M, Yuen S. Triple negative breast cancer: correlation between the MR findings and the pathological findings. Radiology 2009;250:638–647.
Gutierrez RL, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Kurland BF, Peacock S, Lehman CD. BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:994–1000.
Okafuji T, Yabuuchi H, Sakai S, Soeda H, Matsuo Y, Inoue T, et al. MR imaging features of pure mucinous carcinoma of the breast. Eur J Radiol 2006;60:405–413.
Velasco M, Santamaría G, Ganau S, Farrús B, Zanón G, Romagosa C, et al. MRI of metaplastic carcinoma of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1274–1278.
Hasebe T, Tsuda H, Hirohashi S, Shimosato Y, Tsubono Y, Yamamoto H, et al. Fibrotic focus in infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast: a significant histopathological prognostic parameter for predicting the long-term survival of the patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1998;49:195–208.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Uematsu, T., Kasami, M. & Nicholson, B.T. Rim-enhancing breast masses with smooth or spiculated margins on magnetic resonance imaging: histopathology and clinical significance. Jpn J Radiol 29, 609–614 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-011-0612-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-011-0612-8