Skip to main content


Log in

MR imaging findings of benign and malignant circumscribed breast masses: part 1. Solid circumscribed masses

  • Pictorial Essay
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript


The purpose of our study was to review the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings and pathological diagnoses of benign and malignant solid circumscribed breast masses. This article reviews the MR imaging findings of solid circumscribed breast masses. A strategy for the diagnosis of solid circumscribed breast masses with MR imaging is herein presented that incorporates the signal intensity characteristics on T1- and T2-weighted images with the kinetic curve assessment reflected by the temporal and spatial uptake of contrast medium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Graf O, Helbich TH, Hopf G, Graf C, Sickles EA. Probably benign breast masses at US: is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy? Radiology 2007;244:87–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Uematsu T, Kasami M, Yuen S. Triple negative breast cancer: correlation between the MR findings and the pathological findings. Radiology 2009;250:638–647.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schrading S, Kuhl CK. Mammographic, US, MR imaging phenotypes of familial breast cancer. Radiology 2008;246:58–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuhl CK. Concepts for differential diagnosis in breast MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2006;14:305–328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liberman L, Bonaccio E, Hamele-Bena D, Abramson AF, Cohen MA, Dershaw DD. Benign and malignant phyllodes tumors: mammographic and sonographic findings. Radiology 1996;198:121–124.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wurdinger S, Herzog AB, Fischer DR, Marx C, Raabe G, Schneider A, et al. Differentiation of phyllodes breast tumors from fibroadenomas on MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:1317–1321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yabuuchi H, Soeda H, Matsuo Y, Okafuji T, Eguchi T, Sakai S, et al. Phyllodes tumor of the breast: correlation between MR findings and histologic grade. Radiology 2006;241:702–709.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kawashima M, Tamaki Y, Nonaka T, Higuchi K, Kimura M, Koida T, et al. MR imaging of mucinous carcinoma of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:179–183.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yuen S, Uematsu T, Kasami M, Tanaka K, Kimura K, Sanuki J, et al. Breast carcinomas with strong high-signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images: pathological characteristics and differential diagnosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:502–510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gunhan-Bilgen I, Memis A, Ustun EE, Zekioglu O, Ozdemir N. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: clinical, mammographic, and sonographic findings with histopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:1421–1425.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang WT, Hennessy B, Broglio K, Mills C, Sneige N, Davis WG, et al. Imaging differences in metaplastic and invasive ductal carcinomas of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:1288–1293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Velasco M, Santamaria G, Ganau S, Farrus B, Zanon G, Romagosa C, et al. MRI of metaplastic carcinoma of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1274–1278.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wagotz ES, Norris HJ. Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast. 1. Matrix-producing carcinoma. Hum Pathol 1989;20:628–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shin HJ, Kim HH, Kim SM, Kim DB, Kim MJ, Gong G, et al. Imaging features of metaplastic carcinoma with chondroid differentiation of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:691–696.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. World Health Organization. Histological typing of breast tumors. Tumori 1982;68:181–198.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takayoshi Uematsu.

About this article

Cite this article

Uematsu, T., Kasami, M. MR imaging findings of benign and malignant circumscribed breast masses: part 1. Solid circumscribed masses. Jpn J Radiol 27, 395–404 (2009).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

Key words