Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study was to evaluate the film-reading ability of radiographers in detecting gastric cancer during screening X-ray examinations.
Materials and methods
A test set of 100 patients (50 negative and 50 positive; mean age 62 years, range 33–78 years) given a stomach X-ray examination were selected from those who underwent gastric cancer screening in Osaka, Japan, between 2000 and 2003. Eleven radiographers and four radiologists scored the test set on a five-point scale. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was defined as a measure of film-reading ability to detect cancer.
Results
No significant difference (two-tailed P = 0.962, Welch’s t-test) was observed between averaged AUC values from radiographers (0.76, range 0.85–0.62) and radiologists (0.75, range 0.86–0.62).
Conclusion
Film-reading ability of radiographers in detecting gastric cancer during screening X-ray examinations was not significantly different from that of radiologists. Our results suggest that radiographers can assist radiologists to detect gastric cancer during screening.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cheyne N, Field-Boden Q, Wilson I, Hall R. The radiographer and frontline diagnosis. Radiography 1987;53:114.
Price RC, Miller LR, Mellor F. Longitudinal changes in extended roles in radiography: a new perspective. Radiography 2002;8:223–234.
Nickerson C, Cush S. New way of working the NHS breast cancer screening programme: second report on implementation. NHS breast cancer screening publications. Sheffield, UK: National Health Service; 2004.
Pauli R, Hammond S, Cooke J, Ansell J. Radiographers as film readers in screening mammography: an assessment of competence under test and screening conditions. Br J Radiol 1996;69:10–14.
Wivell G, Denton ER, Eve CB, Inglis JC, Harvey I. Can radiographers read screening mammograms? Clin Radiol 2003;58:63–67.
Brealey S, Scally A, Hahn S, Thomas N, Godfrey C, Coomarasamy A. Accuracy of radiographer plain radiograph reporting in clinical practice: a meta-analysis. Clin Radiol 2005;60:232–241.
Brealey S, King DG, Crowe MTI, Crawshaw I, Ford L, Warnock NG, et al. Accident and emergency and general practitioner plain radiograph reporting by radiographers and radiologist: a quasi-randomized controlled trial. Br J Radiol 2003;76:57–61.
Sonex EP, Tasker AD, Coulden RA. The role of preliminary interpretation of chest radiographs by radiographers in the management of acute medical problems within a cardiothoracic center. Br J Radiol 2001;74:230–233.
Brandt A, Andronikou S, Wieselthaler N, Louw B, Kilborn T, Dekker G, et al. Accuracy of radiographer reporting of paediatric brain CT. Pediatr Radiol 2007;37:291–296.
Goto H, Kato J, Hoshi H. Analysis of film readers of screening gastric X-ray examination in Gifu Prefecture. J Gastroenterol Mass Surv 2002;40:521–526 (in Japanese).
Kusano K. The present situation of education for reading doctor of indirect fluorogastrography. J Gastroenterol Mass Surv 2003;41:30–35 (in Japanese).
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma, 2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer 1998;1:10–24.
Committee of Photofluorography. Standardized method of gastric photofluorography. J Gastroenterol Mass Surv 1984;62:3–5 (in Japanese).
Hanley J, McNeil B. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143:29–36.
Mossman D, Somoza E. ROC curves, test accuracy, and the description of diagnostic tests. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1991;3:330–333.
Vida S, Des Rosiers P, Carrier L, Gaulthier S. Depression in Alzheimer’s disease: receiver operating characteristic analysis of the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia and the Hamilton Depression Scale. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1994;7: 159–162.
DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clark-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837–845.
Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 1989;24:234–245.
Rockette HE, Gur D, Metz CE. The use of continuous and discrete confidence judgments in receiver operating characteristic studies of diagnostic imaging techniques. Invest Radiol 1992;27:169–172.
Quality Control Study Group. The quality control guidelines for gastric cancer mass-screening. Presented at the Kanto and Koshinetsu districts conference of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Mass Survey, Tokyo, 1983 (in Japanese).
Kawashima T, Miki N, Yamazaki H, Oshima A, Okano Y, Morii T, et al. Newly designed diagnostic criteria in the gastric mass screening using indirect X-ray. J Gastroenterol Mass Surv 1990;88:37–39 (in Japanese).
Nationwide Statistics Committee for Japan Society of Gastroenterological Mass Survey. Nationwide statistics of mass screening for digestive organ in 2003. J Gastroenterol Mass Surv 2006;44:29–48 (Japanese).
Gur D, Rockette HE, Armfield DR, Blachar A, Bogan JK, Brancatelli G, et al. Prevalence effect in a laboratory environment. Radiology 2003;228:10–14.
Sumkin JH, Klaman HM, Graham M, Ruskauff T, Gennari RC, King JL, et al. Prescreening mammography by technologists: a preliminary assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:253–256.
Consolidated Guidance on Standards for the NHS Breast Screening Programme. NHSBSP Publ. No. 60 (Version 2). Sheffield, UK: NHSBSP; 2005. Available at: http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/breastscreen/publications/nhsbsp60v2.pdf. Accessed March 1, 2009.
College of Radiographers. The medical image interpretation and clinical reporting by non-radiologists: the role of the radiographer. London, UK: College of Radiographers; 2005.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Yatake, H., Takeda, Y., Katsuda, T. et al. Film-reading ability of radiographers in detecting gastric cancer during screening using X-ray examination. Jpn J Radiol 27, 291–296 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-009-0339-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-009-0339-y