Abstract
Purpose
We investigated the mechanism of colon wall deformities in phantoms and assessed the relation between pathological T staging and wall deformity in patients using computed tomography (CT) enema imaging.
Materials and Methods
We performed multidetector-row CT in mass-containing phantoms with no structural deformities and in 36 patients with colon tumors. In the phantoms, we compared images on double-contrast barium (DCB) and CT enema studies, and we compared wall deformities on CT enema studies and the actual phantom structure. In patients, we compared wall deformities on CT enema studies and T staging.
Results
Images from CT enema and DCB studies were identical in the phantom, and all profile images showed geometrical basal indentations. In patients, the grade of deformity increased with invasion depth; and the diagnostic accuracy of T staging was 82.5%. Geometrical basal indentation and poor colon expansion were the primary reasons for overestimating T staging on CT enema imaging.
Conclusion
Although CT enema imaging allows reasonable diagnostic accuracy of T staging, wall deformity is thought to be consistent with tumor infiltration and other factors. We recommend evaluating T staging using not only CT enema imaging but also other techniques, such as virtual endoscopy, axial imaging, and multiplanar reformation imaging.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC 3rd, Barish MA, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1496–1503.
Fidler JL, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ, Hara AK, Harmsen WS. Detection of flat lesions in the colon with CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 2002;27:292–300.
Gollub MJ. Virtual colonoscopy. Lancet 2002;360:964.
Gluecker TM, Fletcher JG. CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy) for the detection of colorectal polyps and neoplasms: current status and future developments. Eur J Cancer 2002;38:2070–2078.
Pescatore P, Glucker T, Delarive J, Meuli R, Pantoflickova D, Duvoisin B, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Gut 2000;47:126–130.
Summers RM, Johnson CD, Pusanik LM, Malley JD, Youssef AM, Reed JE. Automated polyp detection at CT colonography: feasibility assessment in a human population. Radiology 2001;219:51–59.
McMahon PM, Gazelle GS. Colorectal cancer screening issues: a role for CT colonography? Abdom Imaging 2002;27:235–243.
Klingenbeck-Regn K, Schaller S, Flohr T, Ohnesorge B, Kopp AF, Baum U. Subsecond multi-slice computed tomography: basics and applications. Eur J Radiol 1999;31:110–124.
Ushio K, Ishikawa T, Sasagawa M, Yamada T, Itabashi M, Hirota E, et al. Roentgenographic diagnosis on depth of invasion in colorectal cancer. Dig Surg 1983;6:1474–1493.
Ushio K, Goto H, Muramatsu Y, Takayasu K, Moriyama N, Matsue H, et al. Significance of profile view in the X-ray diagnosis of cancer the digestive tract-diagnosis of depth of invasion by double contrast study. Stomach Intestine 1986;21:27–41.
Maruyama M. [Radiological diagnosis of polyps and carcinoma of the large bowel.] Rinsho Hoshasen [Clin Radiol] 1980;25:709–716 (Japanese).
Welin S, Youker J, Spratt JS Jr. The rates and patterns of growth of 375 tumors of the large intestine and rectum observed serially by double contrast barium study (Malmoe technique). Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1963;90:673–687.
Filippone A, Ambrosini R, Fuschi M, Marinelli T, Genovesi D, Bonomo L. Preoperative T and N staging of colorectal cancer: accuracy of contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT colonography—initial experience. Radiology 2004;231:83–90.
Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Passariello R. Colorectal carcinoma: detection and staging with multislice CT (MSCT) colonography. Abdom Imaging 2005;30:13–19.
Nagata K, Endo S, Kudo SE, Kitanosono T, Kushihashi T. CT air-contrast enema as a preoperative examination for colorectal cancer. Dig Surg 2004;21:352–358.
Ament AE, Alfidi RJ, Rao PS. Basal indentation of sessile polypoid lesions: a function of geometry rather than a sign of malignancy. Radiology 1982;143:341–344.
Sato T, Sakai Y, Mitani H, Kadowaki K, Narumi Y, Kuriyama K, et al. [Radio-geometric considetation of basal indentation using phantoms and specimens.] Rinsho Hoshasen [Clin Radiol] 1989;34:1555–1561 (Japanese).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Kayashima, Y., Kimura, F., Inoue, K. et al. Computed tomographic air-contrast enema imaging for presurgical examination of colon tumors: assessment with colon phantoms and in patients. Radiat Med 26, 6–14 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-007-0185-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-007-0185-8
Key words
- Colon tumor
- CT enema
- Phantom study
- T staging