Skip to main content
Log in

One-dimensional regional shear velocity structure from joint inversion of fundamental mode group velocity dispersion measurements of Love and Rayleigh waves: application to the Uttarakhand Himalaya

  • Research Article - Solid Earth Sciences
  • Published:
Acta Geophysica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Between 2017 and 2019, the CSIR-NGRI, Hyderabad, Telangana, established a broad-band seismic-network with fifty-five 3-component broadband seismometers in the Himalayan region of Uttarakhand, India. Out of 55 three component broadband seismic (BBS) networks, we chose 17 for the present study. Using digital waveform data from twenty-one (21) regional Indian earthquakes of Mw 5.0–6.2 that were recorded in the 17 broadband seismometer, we compute fundamental mode group-velocity dispersion (FMGVD) characteristics of surface waves (Love and Rayleigh waves) and the average one-dimensional regional shear-wave velocity (Vs) structure of the Uttarakhand Himalayan region. First, we compute FMGVD curves for Love waves (6–73 s) and Rayleigh waves (at 6.55–73 s) period, and then, we finally invert these dispersion curves to compute the final average one-dimensional regional crustal & sub-crustal shear-wave velocity (Vs) structure below the Uttarakhand Himalaya. Our best model in Uttarakhand Himalayan region, India, reveals the 8-layered crust with a mid-crustal low velocity layer (MC-LVL) (approximately a drop of 1.5–2.3% in Vs) between 8 and 20 km depth in the proximity of MCT (Main Central Thrust). In the upper crustal part (0–20 km depths), our modelling suggests shear velocities (Vs) varies from 3.1 to 3.9 km/sec while shear velocities (Vs) in the lower crustal part (20–45 km depth) are modelled to be varying from 3.7 to 4.69 km per sec. The Moho-depth is calculated to be 45 km deep below the K-G Himalaya, and the shear-velocity (Vs) in the sub-crustal sector is 4.69 km/sec. Our estimated mid-crustal low-velocity layer (MC-LVL) could be linked to the presence of metamorphic fluids in the fractured Main Himalayan Thrust (MHT), resulting from the weakening of the crustal material at the interface between the overriding Eurasian plate and upper part of the underthrusting Indian plate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Waveforms used in our present study were recorded on seventeen three-component broadband seismic stations of a local seismic network of the CSIR-NGRI, Hyderabad, in Uttarakhand, Himalayan region India. Data could be obtained through a request to the Director, CSIR-National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad 500007, Telangana State, India). (director@ngri.res.in).

References

  • Avouac JP (2003) Mountain building, erosion, and the seismic cycle in the Nepal Himalaya. Adv Geophys 46:1–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2687(03)46001-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avouac JP, Meng L, Wei S, Wang T, Ampuero JP (2015) Lowered geoflocked Main Himalayan Thrust unzipped by the 2015 Gorkha earthquake. Nat Geosci 8:708–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berteusen KA (1977) Moho depth determinations based on spectral ratio analysis of NORSAR long-period P waves. Phys Earth Planet Int 31:313–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R (2019) Himalayan earthquakes: a review of historical seismicity and early 21st century slip potential. Geol Soc London Special Publ 483:423–482. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP483.16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell WB, Klemperer SL, Lawrence JF, Rai SS, Ashish (2013) Characterizing the main Himalayan thrust in the Garhwal Himalaya, India with receiver function CCP stacking. Earth Planet Sci Lett 367:15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen NI (1996) Poisson’s ratio and crustal seismology. J Geophys Res 101:3139–3156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen NI, Mooney WD (1995) Seismic velocity structure and composition of the continental crust: a global view. J Geophys Res 100:9761–9788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drukpa D, Velasco AA, Doser DI (2006) Seismicity in the kingdom of Bhutan (1937–2003): evidence for crustal trans current deformation. J Geophys Res 111:B06301. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JB003087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duputel Z, Vergne J, Rivera L, Wittlinger G, Farra V, Hetényi G (2016) The 2015 Gorkha earthquake: a large event illuminating the Main Himalayan Thrust fault. Geophys Res Lett 43:2517–2525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dziewonski AS, Bloch S, Landisman N (1969) A technique for the analysis of transient seismic signals. Bull Seismol Soc Am 59:427–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gahalaut VK, Kalpna (2001) Himalayan mid crustal ramp. Curr Sci 81(12):1641–1646

    Google Scholar 

  • Gansser A (1964) Geology of the Himalayas; London Wileyinter-science. p 289

  • Gaur VK, Chander R, Sarkar I, Khattri KN, Sinhval H (1985) Seismicity and state of stress from investigations of local earthquakes in the Kumaun Himalaya. Tectonophysics 118:243–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heim A, Gansser A (1939) Central Himalaya: Geo-logical observations of the Swiss Expedition, 1936, Delhi, India, Hindustan Publishing p 246

  • Heim A, Gansser A (1936) Central Himalaya: geological observa-tions of Swiss expedition. Denkschr Schweiss Nat Ges 73:245

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann RB (1987) Surface wave inversion, in computer programs in seismology, vol IV. Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann RB (2004) Computer programs in seismology. St. Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, Department of Earthand Atmospheric Sciences

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanaujia J, Kumar A, Gupta SC (2015) 1D velocity structure and characteristics of contemporary local seismicity around the Tehri Region, Garhwal Himalaya. Bull Seismol Soc Am 105:1852–1869. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayal JR (1996) Precursor seismicity, foreshocks and aftershocks of the Uttarkashi earthquake of October 20, 1991 at Garhwal Himalaya. Tectonophysics 263(1):339–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayal JR, Ram S, Singh OP, Chakraborty PK, Karunakar G (2003) Aftershocks of the March 1999 Chamoli earthquake and seismotectonic structure of the Garhwal Himalaya. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennett BLN, Engdahl ER (1991) Travel times for global earthquake location and phase identification. Geophys J Int 105:429–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1991.tb06724.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khattri KN (1992) Local seismic investigations in Garhwal-Kumaun Himalaya. Geol Soc India Mem 23:45–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Khattri KN, Chandra R, Gaur VK, Sarkar I, Kumar S (1989) New seismological result on tectonics of Garhawal Himalaya. Earth Planet Sci 98(1):91–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N, Sharma J, Arora RB, Mukhopadhyay S (2009) Seismotectonic model of the Kangra–Chamba sector of NW Himalaya: constraints from joint hypocenter determination and focal mechanism. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:95–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavé J, Avouac JP (2001) Fluvial incision and tectonic uplift across the Himalayas of central Nepal. J Geophys Res 106:26–561

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemonnier C, Marquis G, Perrier F, Avouac JP, Chitrakar G, Kafle B, Bano M (1999) Electrical structure of the Himalaya of central Nepal: high conductivity around the mid-crustal ramp along the MHT. J Geophys Res 26:3261–3264

    Google Scholar 

  • Levshin AL, Ratnikova L, Berger J (1992) Peculiar-itiesof surface wave propagation across central Eurasia. Bull Seismol Soc Am 82:2464–2493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang X, Zhou S, Chen YJ, Jin G, Xiao L, Liu P, Ning J (2008) Earthquake distribution in southern Tibet and its tectonic implications. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahesh P, Rai SS, Sivaram K, Paul A, Gupta S, Sharma R, Gaur VK (2013) One- dimensional reference velocity model and precise locations of earthquake hypocenters in the central (Kumaon–Garhwal) Himalaya. Bull Seismol Soc Am 103:328–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal P, Padhy S, Rastogi BK, Satyanarayana HVS, Kousalya M, Vijayraghavan R, Srinivasan (2001) A aftershock activity and frequency-dependent low coda Qc in the epicentral region of the 1999 Chamoli earthquake of Mw6.4. Pure Appl Geophys 158:1719–1735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal P, Srinivas D, Suresh G, Srinagesh D (2021) Modelling of crustal composition and Moho depths and their implications toward seismogenesis in the Kumaon-Garhwal Himalaya. Sci Rep 11:14067. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93469-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal P, Srinagesh D, Vijayraghavan R, Suresh G, Naresh B, Raju PS, Devi A, Swathi K, Singh DK, Srinivas D, Saha S, Shekar M, Sarma ANS, Murthy YVVBSN (2022) Seismic velocity imaging of the Kumaon-Garhwal Himalaya. India Natural Hazard 111:2241–2260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monsalve G, Sheehan A, Schulte-Pelkum V, Rajaure S, Pandey R, Mand WuF (2006) Seismicity and one-dimensional velocity structure of the Himalayan collision zone: earthquakes in the crust and upper man- tle. J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JB004062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey MR, Tandukar RP, Avonac JP, Lave J, Massot JP (1995) Interseismic strain accumulation on the Himalayan crustal ramp (Nepal). Geophys Res Lett 22:751–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pant CC, Paul A (2007) Recent trends in seismicity of Uttaranchal. J Geol Soc India 70:619–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul A, Tiwari A, Upadhyay R (2019) Central seismic gap and probable zone of large earthquake in North West Himalaya. Him Geol 40(2):199–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Petley DN, Hearn GJ, Hart A, Rosser NJ, Dunning SA, Oven K, Mitchell WA (2007) Trendsin landslide occurrence in Nepal. Nat Hazards 43:23–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-9100-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers PM, Lillie RJ, Yeats RS (1998) Structure and shortening of the Kangra and Dehra Dun reentrants, Sub-Himalaya India. Geol Soc Amer Bull 110:1010–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajendran CP, Rajendran K (2001) Characteristics of deformation and past seismicity associated with the 1819 Kutch Earthquake. Northwestern India Bull Seismol Soc Am 91(3):407–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rastogi BK, Gupta HK, Mandal P (2001) The deadliest stable continental region earthquake that occurred near Bhuj on 26 January 2001. J Seismol 5:609–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satyabala PS, Gupta HK (1996) Is the quiescence of major earthquakes (M ≥7.5) Since 1952 in the Himalaya and Northeast India Real?; bull. Seismol Soc Am 86:1983–1986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro NM, Campillo M, Paul A, Singh SK, Jongmans D, Sanchez-Sesma F (1997) Surface wave propagation across the Mexican volcanic belt and origin of the long period seismic wave amplification in the valley of Mexico. Geophys J Int 128:151–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava P, Mitra G (1994) Thrust geometries and deep structure of the outer and lesser Himalaya, Kumaon and Garhwal (India): implications for evolution of the Himalayan fold-and-thrust belt. Tectonics 13:89–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakur VC, Sriram V, Mundepi AK (2000) Seismotectonics of the great 1905 Kangra earthquake meizoseismal region in Kangra-Chamba. NW Himalaya Tectonophys 326(3):289–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari A, Paul A, Singh R, Upadhyay R (2021) Potential seismogenic asperities in the Garhwal-Kumaun region, NW Himalaya: seismotectonic implications. Nat Hazards 107:73–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04574-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari A, Sain K, Kumar A, Tiwari J, Paul A, Kumar N, Haldar C, Kumar S, Pandey C (2022) Potential seismic precursors and surficial dynamics of a deadly Himalayan disaster: an early warning approach. Sci Rep 12:3733. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07491-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari A, Paul A, Sain K, Singh R, Upadhyay R (2023) Depth-dependent seismic anomalies and potential asperity linked to fluid-driven crustal structure in Garhwal region. NW Himalaya Tectonophys 862:229975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2023.229975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari A, Kumar P, Sain K, Paul A (2023) Possible implications of recent Doti-Nepal earthquake (M 6.3) for seismicity monitoring in the Central Himalaya. Himalayan Geology 44(2):57–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdiya KS (1981) Tectonics of the Central Sector of the Himalaya. Am Geophys Union Geodyn Ser 3:87

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdiya K S (1980) Geology of Kumaun Lesser Himalaya, Interim Rec- ord: Dehradun, Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun, India; 291 pp.

  • Wei S, Chen YJ, Sandvol E, Zhou S, Yue H, Jin G, Hearn TM, Jiang M, Wang H, Fan W, Liu Z, Ge Z, Wang Y, Feng Y, Ni J (2010) Regional earthquakes in northern Tibetan Plateau: Implications for lithospheric strength in Tibet. Geophys Res Lett 37(L19307):5. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044800

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are Thankful to the Director, CSIR-National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad, for his kind permission to publish our present work. This study is supported by the CSIR funded Mission mode project on “Safety and security of vital installations”. Authors are grateful to Prof. Hermann, Saint-Louis University, USA, for providing the seismological software for carrying out the surface- wave dispersion study in the present paper; this article, bearing the WIHG contribution No. WIHG/0270.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The modelling and computation of surface wave dispersion is done by Abhishek Kumar Gupta (AKG). Prantik Mandal (PM) and D. Srinagesh (DSN) have cooperated in the interpretation of geodynamic models of this region. Data are gathered, prepared and pre-processed by AKG, PM and DSN. AKG and PM, AT and KS also contributed to discussions—interpretation and writing of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anil Tiwari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or any personal relationship that could have appeared to influence this work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Edited by Prof. Marian Ivan (ASSOCIATE EDITOR) / Prof. Ramon Zuñiga (CO-EDITOR-IN-CHIEF).

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1241 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, A.K., Mandal, P., Srinagesh, D. et al. One-dimensional regional shear velocity structure from joint inversion of fundamental mode group velocity dispersion measurements of Love and Rayleigh waves: application to the Uttarakhand Himalaya. Acta Geophys. 71, 2619–2632 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-023-01167-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-023-01167-5

Keywords

Navigation