Skip to main content

Tuzla earthquake swarm in Turkey

Abstract

Long-lasting earthquake clusters are common in western Anatolia. One of them has been active in the southwestern part of the Biga peninsula. We had studied this cluster in terms of strain energy produced over time and revealed its interesting characteristics. The seismicity in this clustering region is not normal in terms of both the number of earthquakes, duration of the activity, magnitude/frequency and mainshock/aftershock relations, and the strain energy produced. An abnormal seismic activity with a set of medium-sized earthquakes without a mainshock, which are indistinguishable in size occurred in this clustering region in 2017. Interesting features that are characteristic of earthquake swarms are probably related to the abnormal physical properties of the crust. The 2017 Tuzla activity, where there is also no notable aftershock activity, could be associated with a phase of the swarming phenomenon itself. For this, we approached the 2017 activity in terms of the fact that it may not be part of the active tectonic system. Apart from the presence of high geotherm and hot springs in the region, the crust has been weakened by pre-existing intense fault zones that have developed in previous deformation regimes since the paleo-tectonic periods. Historical and instrumental period large earthquakes have caused loss of life and property in Biga peninsula due to an existing active fault zone. The Tuzla region probably is in this zone extending NE-SW in the peninsula. However, it is very difficult or impossible to distinguish possible foreshocks or precursory phenomenon of a future large earthquake from the background activity of the earthquake swarms.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

source as in Fig. 1. Black and white dots represent M ≥ 2 and M ≥ 5 magnitude earthquakes, respectively. 2013 Bozbaba activity region was shown with the gray-shaded rectangle

Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

source as in Fig. 1. The unit values (4 × 1017 erg) of the graphs are equal for comparison. a Annual strain energy reduction after the 5 July 1983 earthquake (Ms = 5.8) in Biga clustering region shown with rectangle A in Fig. 1. b Annual strain energy reduction after the 9 January 2013 earthquake (Ms = 5.1) in Bozbaba region shown with a shaded rectangle in Fig. 3

Fig. 7

source as in Fig. 1. Gray color plot for the frame shown in Fig. 3 with a shaded gray rectangle. Black plot for the region C in Fig. 1. The energy release of 2013 aftershocks was taken together with Tuzla swarm activity for this plot. The decreased strain energy of aftershocks following main shocks in regions with relatively calm (normal) background seismicity can be seen (gray line). This well-known energy decrease becomes invisible when we consider the 2013 activity region and Tuzla swarm together

Fig. 8

References

  • Aki K (1984) Asperities, barriers, characteristic earthquakes and strong motion prediction. J Geophys Res 89:5867–5872. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB089iB07p05867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayhan EE, Alsan N, Sancaklı SB, Üçer B (1981) Türkiye ve Dolayları Deprem Kataloğu (1881-1990). Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları 126p

  • Bariş Ş, Ito A, Üçer SB, Honkura Y, Kafadar N, Pektaş E, Komut T, Işikara AM (2002) Microearthquake activity before the İzmit earthquake in the Eastern Marmara Region, Turkey (1 January 1993–17 August 1999). Bull Seismol Soc Am 92(1):394–405. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120000826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bath M (1973) Introducion to Seismology. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel and Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekler T, Demirci A (2018) Preliminary Observations and Assessment of Çanakkale-Ayvacık Earthquake Activity. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Univ J Grad Sch Nat Appl Sci 4(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekström G, England P (1989) Seismic strain rates in regions of distributed continental deformation. J Geophys Res 94(B8):10231–10257. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB094iB08p10231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emre Ö, Doğan A (2010) 1:250.000 Ölçekli Türkiye Diri Fay Haritaları Serisi, Ayvalık (NJ 35–2) Paftası, Seri No:2, General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration (MTA), Ankara-Türkiye

  • Erenoğlu CR, Erenoğlu O (2018) Monitoring Postsismic Crustal Deformation using GPS/GNSS Surveying by 06 February 2017 Ayvacık-Çanakkale Earthquake. International Symposium on Modern Technologies, Education and Professional Practice in Geodesy and Related Fields, Sofya, Bulgaria, 8 - 09 November 2018, 1, 102–116

  • Erenoğlu CR, Özden S, Bekler T, Ulugergerli E, Erenoğlu O (2018) 06 Şubat 2017 Ayvacik-Çanakkale Depremleri Sonrasi Gps/Gnss İle Postsismik Kabuk Hareketlerinin İzlenmesi, Sonuç Raporu. TÜBİTAK project (FHD-2017–1200)

  • Flerit F, Armijo R, King GCP, Meyer B, Barka A (2003) Slip partitioning in the Sea of Marmara pull-apart determined from GPS velocity vectors. Geophys J Int 154(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01899.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foose RM (1985) Geological information from satellite surveys of the mediterranean region. In: DJ Stanley, FC Wezel (eds) Geological evolution of the Mediterranean Basin, pp 29–53

  • Görgün E, Albora AM (2017) Seismotectonic ınvestigation of biga Peninsula in SW Marmara region using steerable filter technique, potential field data and recent seismicity. Pure Appl Geophys 174:3889–3904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1604-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Görgün E, Kalafat D, Kekovalı K (2020) Source Mechanisms and stress field of the 2017 Ayvacık/Çanakkale earthquake sequence in NW Turkey. Ann Geophys 63(3):332. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-8194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hainzl S (2004) Seismicity patterns of earthquake swarms due to fluid intrusion and stress triggering. Geophys J Int 159:1090–1096. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02463.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahle H-G, Cocard M, Peter Y, Geiger A, Reilinger R, McClusky S, King R, Barka A, Veis G (1999) The GPS Strain Rate Field in the Aegean Sea and Western Anatolia. Geophys Res Lett 26(16):2513–2516. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL900403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahle H-G, Cocard M, Peter Y, Geiger A, Reilinger R, Barka A, Veis G (2000) GPS- derived strain rate field within the boundary zones of the Eurasian, African, and Arabian Plates. J Geophys Res 105(B10):23353–23370. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JB900238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalafat D, Güneş Y, Kara M, Deniz P, Kekovalı K, Kuleli HS, Gülen L, Yılmazer M, Özel NM (2007) A revised and extended earthquake catalogue for Turkey since 1900, M≥ 4.0. Bogaziçi University Publication. ISBN 978-975-518-218-0

  • Kalafat D., Güneş Y, Kekovalı K, Kara M, Deniz P, Yılmazer M (2011) A revised and extended earthquake catalogue for Turkey since 1900 (1900–2010, M ≥4.0). Boğaziçi University Library Cataloging, İstanbul

  • Ketin I, Roesly F (1953) Makroseismische Untersuchungen über das nordwestanatolische Beben vom 18.März 1953. Eclogae Geol Helv 46(2):187–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiratzi AA, Wagner GS, Langston CA (1991) Source parameters of some large earthquakes in Northern Aegean determined by body waveform inversion. Pure Appl Geophys 135(4):515–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komut T, Gray R, Pysklywec R, Göğüş OH (2012) Mantle flow uplift of western Anatolia and the Aegean: interpretations from geophysical analyses and geodynamic modeling. J Geophys Res 117:B11412. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JB009306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kop A, Özalp S, Elmacı H, Kara M, Duman TY (2016) Active tectonic and palaeoseismological features of the western section of Mustafakemalpaşa Fault; Bursa, NW Anatolia. Geodin Acta 28(4):363–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/09853111.2016.1208525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreemer C, Chamot-Rooke N (2004) Contemporary kinematics of the southern Aegean and the Mediterranean Ridge. Geophys J Int 157(3):1377–1392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02270.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesimeri M, Kourouklas C, Papadimitriou E, Karakostas V, Kementzetzidou D (2018) Analysis of microseismicity associated with the 2017 seismic swarm near the Aegean coast of NW Turkey. Acta Geophys 66:479–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-018-0157-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mogi K (1967) Earthquakes and fractures. Tectonophysics 5(1):35–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(67)90043-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mützenberg S (1997) Nature and origin of the thermal springs in the Tuzla area, Western Anatolia, Turkey. Active tectonics of Northwestern Anatolia–The Marmara Poly–Project (Ed. Schindler, C., Pfister, M.) Zürich 301–320. ISBN: 3728124257

  • Nyst M, Thatcher W (2004) New constraints on the active tectonic deformation of the Aegean. J Geophys Res 109:B11406. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JB002830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özalp S, Emre Ö, Doğan A (2013) The segment structure of southern branch of the North Anatolian Fault and paleoseismological behavior of the Gemlik Fault NW Anatolia. Gen Dir Miner Res Explor (MTA) Bull 147:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Özden S, Över S, Poyraz SA, Güneş Y, Pınar A (2018) Tectonic implications of the 2017 Ayvacık (Çanakkale) earthquakes, Biga Peninsula, NW Turkey. J Asian Earth Sci 154:125–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reilinger R, McClusky S (2001) GPS constraints on block motions and deformations in western Turkey and the Aegean: Implications for earthquake hazards. Seismotectonics of the North-Western Anatolia-Aegean and Recent Turkish Earthquakes (Ed. T. Taymaz) Istanbul Technical University 14– 20. ISBN 975-97518-0-1

  • Rikitake T (1975) Earthquake precursors. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65(5):1133–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sözbilir H, Sümer Ö, Özkaymak Ç, Uzel B, Güler T, Eski S (2016) Kinematic analysis and palaeoseismology of the Edremit Fault Zone: evidence for past earthquakes in the southern branch of the North Anatolian Fault Zone, Biga Peninsula, NW Turkey. Geodinamica Acta 28(4):273–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/09853111.2016.1175294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sözbilir H, Uzel B, Sümer Ö, Eski S, Softa M, Tepe Ç, Özkaymak Ç, Baba A (2018) Seismic Sources of (14th January-20th March 2017) Çanakkale-Ayvacık Earthquake Swarm. Eskişehir Tech Univ J Sci Technol B Theor Sci 6:1–7. https://doi.org/10.20290/aubtdb.498805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straub C, Kahle HG (1997) Recent crustal deformation and strain accumulation in the Marmara Sea region, NW Anatolia, inferred from repeated GPS measurements. Active tectonics of Northwestern Anatolia–The Marmara Poly–Project (Ed. Schindler, C., Pfister, M.) Zürich 417–447. ISBN: 3728124257

  • Svigkas N, Atzori S, Kiratzi A, Tolomei C, Salvi S (2019) Isolation of swarm sources using InSAR: the case of the February 2017 seismic swarm in western Anatolia (Turkey). Geophys J Int 217(3):1479–1495. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarcan G, Gemici Ü, Aksoy N (2005) Hydrogeological and geochemical assessments of the Gediz Graben geothermal areas, western Anatolia, Turkey. Environ Geol 47:523–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-004-1174-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Üçer SB, Crampin S, Evans R, Miller A, Kafadar N (1985) The MARNET radiolinked seismometer network spanning the Marmara Sea and the seismicity of Western Turkey. Geophys J Roy Astron Soc 83:17–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1985.tb05153.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Üçer B, Eyidoğan H, Gürbüz C, Barka A, Bariş Ş (1997) Seismic investigations of the Marmara region. Active tectonics of Northwestern Anatolia–The Marmara Poly–Project (Ed. Schindler, C., Pfister, M.) Zürich 91–99. ISBN: 3728124257

  • Üçer SB (1990) Seismicity of the Marmara Region and its relation with tectonics. Ph.D. Thesis, Istanbul Univ. Institute of Sciences, 142 pp (in Turkish)

  • Yaltırak C, İşler EB, Aksu AE, Hiscott RN (2012) Evolution of the Bababurnu Basin and shelf of the Biga Peninsula: western extension of the middle strand of the North Anatolian Fault Zone, Northeast Aegean Sea, Turkey. J Asian Earth Sci 57:103–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.06.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu W, Allison KL, Dunham EM, Yang Y (2020) Fault valving and pore pressure evolution in simulations of earthquake sequences and aseismic slip. Nat Commun 11:4833. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18598-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study includes a part of Ms thesis (Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Turkey) of Rıza Baysal. We thank Doğan Kalafat for inspiring guidance on the subtleties of using the earthquake catalog. We are grateful to Cüneyt Erenoğlu for sharing his geodetic study results and carefully reviewing the manuscript. We thank Esen Arpat, for his valuable comments on swarming earthquakes. We express our gratitude to Cemil Gürbüz who helped to improve the manuscript.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tolga Komut.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Edited by Prof. Semih Ergintav (ASSOCIATE EDITOR) / Prof. Ramón Zúñiga (CO-EDITOR-IN-CHIEF).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Komut, T., Baysal, R. Tuzla earthquake swarm in Turkey. Acta Geophys. 70, 1037–1045 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-022-00784-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-022-00784-w

Keywords

  • Earthquake swarm
  • 2017 Tuzla (Ayvacık) earthquake activity
  • Earthquake clustering