Advertisement

International Journal of Anthropology

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 67–74 | Cite as

Gaining New Insights into How Genetic Factors Influence Human Dental Development by Studying Twins

  • Grant TownsendEmail author
  • Toby Hughes
  • Lindsay Richards
Article

Abstract

Many previous attempts to quantify the contribution of genetic factors to human dental variation using the classical twin design have been based on untested assumptions that lead to unreliable estimates of heritability. We have applied structural equation modelling to several different dental phenotypes in a sample of over 600 pairs of Australian twins, enabling the goodness-of-fit of the data to be tested against genetic models incorporating different components of genetic and environmental variance. Our results indicate that the contribution of additive genetic effects to phenotypic variation differs considerably between different dental traits. Heritability estimates for intercuspal distances of molar teeth and for incisal overbite and overjet are low to moderate in magnitude, whereas heritabilities for overall molar crown size and arch dimensions are moderate to high. We propose that after formation of the enamel knots during odontogenesis, the emerging pattern of molar cusps results from a cascade of local epigenetic events, rather than being under direct genetic control. Variation in molar crown size is explained best by a model incorporating additive genetic effects, as well as environmental influences that are both unique and common to co-twins. These environmental influences presumably operate in utero during the early stages of molar odontogenesis prior to crown calcification. The relatively low heritabilities noted for occlusal traits are consistent with the importance of masticatory activity and muscle function in determining the interrelationships between teeth in opposing dental arches. We believe that well-designed studies of twins, coupled with modern genome-scanning approaches, offer great potential to identify key “dental” genes and to clarify how these genes interact with the environment during development.

Keywords

Teeth Additive genetic effects Environment Heritability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study forms part of an ongoing investigation of the teeth and faces of Australian twins and their families that is supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (Competing Epidemiological Grant 157904). We particularly thank the twins and their families who have agreed to participate in this research project and The Australian Twin Registry for their continuing assistance. The assistance of Sandy Pinkerton and Wendy Schwerdt is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Martin NG, Eaves LJ (1977) The genetical analysis of covariance structure. Heredity 40:79–95Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Neale M, Cardon L (1992) Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Martin NG, Boomsma D, Machin GA (1997) A twin-pronged attack on complex traits. Nat Genet 17:387–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sperber GH (2004) The genetics of odontogenesis: implications in dental anthropology and palaeo-odontology. Dent Anthropol 17:1–7Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dempsey PJ, Townsend GC (2001) Genetic and environmental contributions to variation in human tooth size. Heredity 86:685–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hughes T, Thomas C, Richards L, Townsend G (2001) A study of occlusal variation in the primary dentition of Australian twins and singletons. Arch Oral Biol 46:857–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Townsend G, Richards L, Hughes T (2003) Molar intercuspal dimensions: genetic input to phenotypic variation. J Dent Res 82:350–355Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Townsend GC, Richards LC, Hughes T, Pinkerton S, Schwerdt W (2003) The value of twins in dental research. Aust Dent J 48:82–88Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eguchi S, Townsend GC, Richards LC, Hughes T, Kasai K (2004) Genetic contribution to dental arch size variation in Australian twins. Arch Oral Biol 49:1015–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Neale MC (1997) Mx: Statistical modelling. Department of Human Genetics, Richmond, VAGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Salazar-Ciudad I, Jernvall J (2002) A gene network model accounting for development and evolution of mammalian teeth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:8116–8120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thesleff I, Keranen S, Jernvall J (2001) Enamel knots as signalling centers linking tooth morphogenesis and odontoblast differentiation. Adv Dent Res 15:14–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harris EF, Smith RJ (1980) A study of occlusion and arch width in families. Am J Orthod 78:155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Townsend GC, Corruccini RS, Richards LC, Brown T (1988) Genetic and environmental determinants of dental occlusal variation in Australian twins. Aust J Orthod 10:231–235Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    MacGregor AJ, Snieder H, Schork NJ, Spector TD (2000) Twins: novel uses to study complex traits and genetic diseases. Trends Genet 16:131–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dental SchoolThe University of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations