Abstract
Objective
Few studies have investigated the differences in outcomes between primary and repeat surgery for a craniopharyngioma in adults. As a result, a treatment concept for adult patients with a craniopharyngioma has not yet been established. The present study aimed to retrospectively analyze adult patients with craniopharyngioma to compare surgical outcomes between primary surgery and surgery for recurrence.
Methods
The demographic and clinical data of 68 adult patients with craniopharyngioma who had primary surgery (n=50) or surgery for recurrence (n=18) were retrospectively analyzed. In addition, the patients were followed up for an average of 38.6 months (range: 1–133 months).
Results
The cohorts of patients undergoing primary surgery or repeat surgery did not differ preoperatively in terms of demographic data, or radiological tumor features. However, patients with recurrent craniopharyngioma had significantly more pituitary hormone deficits and hypothalamo-pituitary disorders before surgery compared with patients with newly diagnosed craniopharyngioma. The success rate of complete resection in primary surgery was 53.2%. Even after repeat surgery, a satisfactory rate of complete resection of 35.7% was achieved. Operative morbidity was increased neither in patients with repeat surgery compared with those with primary surgery (postoperative bleeding P=0.560; meningitis P=1.000; CSF leak P=0.666; visual disturbance P=0.717) nor in patients with complete resection compared with those with partial resection. We found no difference in recurrence-free survival between initial surgery and repeat surgery (P=0.733). The recurrence rate was significantly lower after complete resection (6.9%) than after partial resection (47.8%; P<0.001).
Conclusion
Attempting complete resection is justified for not only those with newly diagnosed craniopharyngioma but also for those with recurrent craniopharyngioma. However, the surgeon must settle for less than total resection if postoperative morbidity is anticipated.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Fahlbusch R, Honegger J, Paulus W, et al. Surgical treatment of craniopharyngiomas: experience with 168 patients. J Neurosurg, 1999,90(2):237–250
Prieto R, Rosdolsky M, Hofecker V, et al. Craniopharyngioma treatment: an updated summary of important clinicopathological concepts. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab, 2020,15(4):261–282
Müller HL. Craniopharyngioma and hypothalamic injury: latest insights into consequent eating disorders and obesity. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes, 2016,23(1):81–89
Honegger J, Tatagiba M. Craniopharyngioma surgery. Pituitary, 2008,11(4):361–373
Müller HL. The diagnosis and treatment of cranio-pharyngioma. Neuroendocrinology, 2020,110(9–10):753–766
Elowe-Gruau E, Beltrand J, Brauner R, et al. Childhood craniopharyngioma: hypothalamus-sparing surgery decreases the risk of obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2013,98(6):2376–2382
Bogusz A, Boekhoff S, Warmuth-Metz M, et al. Posterior hypothalamus-sparing surgery improves outcome after childhood craniopharyngioma. Endocr Connect, 2019,8(5):481–492
Dandurand C, Sepehry AA, Lari MHA, et al. Adult Craniopharyngioma: case series, systemic review, and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery, 2018,83(4):631–641
Cossu G, Jouanneau E, Cavallo LM, et al. Surgical management of craniopharyngiomas in adult patients: a systematic review and consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2020,162(5):1159–1177
Mende KC, Kellner T, Petersenn S, et al. Clinical situation, therapy, and follow-up of adult craniopharyngioma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2020,105(1):dgz043
Tang B, Xie SH, Xiao LM, et al. A novel endoscopic classification for craniopharyngioma based on its origin. Sci Rep, 2018,8(1):10215
Lopez-Serna R, Gómez-Amador JL, Barges-Coll J, et al. Treatment of craniopharyngioma in adults: systematic analysis of a 25-year experience. Arch Med Res, 2012,43(5):347–355
Park HJ, Dho YS, Kim JH, et al. Recurrence rate and prognostic factors for the adult craniopharyngiomas in long-term follow-up. World Neurosurg, 2020,133:e211–e217
Erfurth EM, Holmer H, Fjalldal SB. Mortality and morbidity in adult craniopharyngioma. Pituitary, 2013,16(1):46–55
Sadashivam S, Menon G, Abraham M, et al. Adult Craniopharyngioma: the role of extent of resection in tumor recurrence and long-term functional outcome. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2020,192:105711
Lee EJ, Cho YH, Hong SH, et al. Is the complete resection of craniopharyngiomas in adults feasible considering both the oncologic and functional outcomes? J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2015,58(5):432–441
Kim YH, Kim CY, Kim JW, et al. Longitudinal analysis of visual outcomes after surgical treatment of adult craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurgery, 2012,71(3):715–721
Van Gompel JJ, Nippoldt TB, Higgins DM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-graded hypothalamic compression in surgically treated adult craniopharyngiomas determining postoperative obesity. Neurosurg Focus, 2010,28(4):E3
Apra C, Enachescu C, Lapras V, et al. Is gross total resection reasonable in adults with craniopharyngiomas with hypothalamic involvement? World Neurosurg, 2019,129:e803–e811
Karavitaki N, Brufani C, Warner JT, et al. Craniopharyngiomas in children and adults: systematic analysis of 121 cases with long-term follow-up. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf), 2005,62(4):397–409
Mortini P, Losa M, Pozzobon G, et al. Neurosurgical treatment of craniopharyngioma in adults and children: early and long-term results in a large case series. J Neurosurg, 2011,114(5):1350–1359
Adib SD, Herlan S, Ebner FH, et al. Interoptic, Trans-lamina Terminalis, Opticocarotid Triangle, and Caroticosylvian Windows From Mini-Supraorbital, Frontomedial, and Pterional Perspectives: A Comparative Cadaver Study With Artificial Lesions. Front Surg, 2019,6:40
Komotar RJ, Starke RM, Raper DM, et al. Endoscopic endonasal compared with microscopic transsphenoidal and open transcranial resection of craniopharyngiomas. World Neurosurg, 2012,77(2):329–341
Koutourousiou M, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Wang EW, et al. The limits of transsellar/transtuberculum surgery for craniopharyngioma. J Neurosurg Sci, 2018,62(3):301–309
Alli S, Isik S, Rutka JT. Microsurgical removal of craniopharyngioma: endoscopic and transcranial techniques for complication avoidance. J Neurooncol, 2016,130(2):299–307
Van Effenterre R, Boch AL. Craniopharyngioma in adults and children: a study of 122 surgical cases. J Neurosurg, 2002,97(1):3–11
Shi XE, Wu B, Fan T, et al. Craniopharyngioma: surgical experience of 309 cases in China. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2008,110(2):151–159
Prat R, Galeano I, Evangelista R, et al. Transeyebrow supraorbital approach in large suprasellar craniopharyngioma surgery in adults: analysis of optic nerve length and extent of tumor resection. Original article. Acta Neurochir, 2017,159:873–880
Hoffman HJ, De Silva M, Humphreys RP, et al. Aggressive surgical management of craniopharyngiomas in children. J Neurosurg, 1992,76(1):47–52
Yaşargil MG, Curcic M, Kis M, et al. Total removal of craniopharyngiomas. Approaches and long-term results in 144 patients. J Neurosurg, 1990,73(1):3–11
Turel MK, Tsermoulas G, Gonen L, et al. Management and outcome of recurrent adult craniopharyngiomas: an analysis of 42 cases with long-term follow-up. Neurosurg Focus, 2016,41(6):E11
Lee MH, Kim SH, Seoul HJ, et al. Impact of maximal safe resection on the clinical outcome of adults with craniopharyngiomas. J Clin Neurosci, 2012,19(7):1005–1008
Wannemuehler TJ, Rubel KE, Hendricks BK, et al. Outcomes in transcranial microsurgery versus extended endoscopic endonasal approach for primary resection of adult craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurg Focus, 2016,41(6):E6
Baldé NM, Diallo MM, Poirier JY, et al. Long-term outcome of the adult onset craniopharyngiomas. Ann Endocrinol (Paris), 2007,68(2–3):186–190
Jung TY, Jung S, Choi JE, et al. Adult craniopharyngiomas: surgical results with a special focus on endocrinological outcomes and recurrence according to pituitary stalk preservation. J Neurosurg, 2009,111(3):572–577
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zamora, R.E., Grimm, F., Adib, S.D. et al. Surgical Treatment of Craniopharyngiomas in Adults: Comparison between Primary Surgery and Surgery for Recurrence. CURR MED SCI 42, 1119–1130 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-022-2679-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-022-2679-0