Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Occupational Extremely Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure on the Thyroid Gland of Workers: A Prospective Study

  • Published:
Current Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the biological effects of occupational extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field (ELF-EMF) exposure on the thyroid gland.

Methods

We conducted a prospective analysis of 85 workers (exposure group) exposed to an ELF-EMF (100 μT, 10–100 Hz) produced by the electromagnetic aircraft launch system and followed up on thyroid function indices, immunological indices, and color Doppler images for 3 years. Additionally, 116 healthy volunteers were randomly selected as controls (control group), the thyroid function of whom was compared to the exposure group.

Results

No significant difference was observed in thyroid function between the exposure and control groups. During the follow-up of the exposure group, the serum free triiodothyronine (FT3) level was found to slowly decrease and free thyroxine (FT4) level slowly increase with increasing exposure time. However, no significant difference was found in thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) over the three years, and no significant difference was observed in the FT3, FT4 and TSH levels between different exposure subgroups. Furthermore, no significant changes were observed in thyroid autoantibody levels and ultrasound images between subgroups or over time.

Conclusion

Long-term exposure to ELF-EMF may promote thyroid secretion of T4 and inhibit deiodination of T4 to T3. ELF-EMF has no significant effect on thyroid immune function and morphology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhou SA, Uesaka M. Bioelectrodynamics in living organisms. Int J Eng Sci, 2006,44(1):67–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boland A, Delapierre D, Mossay D, et al. Effect of intermittent and continuous exposure to electromagnetic fields on cultured hippocampal cells. Bioelectromagnetics, 2002,23(2):97–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Migault L, Piel C, Carles C, et al. Maternal cumulative exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and pregnancy outcomes in the Elfe cohort. Environ Int, 2018,112:165–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Diniz P, Soejima K, Ito G. Nitric oxide mediates the effects of pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation on the osteoblast proliferation and differentiation. Nitric Oxide, 2002,7(1):18–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wei Y, Xiaolin H, Tao S. Effects of extremely low-frequency-pulsed electromagnetic field on different-derived osteoblast-like cells. Electromagn Biol Med, 2008,27(3):298–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ivancsits S, Diem E, Pilger A, et al. Induction of DNA strand breaks by intermittent exposure to extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic fields in human diploid fibroblasts. Mutat Res, 2002,519(1–2):1–13

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hu GL, Chiang H, Zeng QL, et al. ELF magnetic field inhibits gap junctional intercellular communication and induces hyperphosphorylation of connexin43 in NIH3T3 cells. Bioelectromagnetics, 2001,22(8):568–573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Marino AA, Wolcott RM, Chervenak R, et al. Nonlinear response of the immune system to power-frequency magnetic fields. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol, 2000,279(3):R761–768

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marino AA, Wolcott RM, Chervenak R, et al. Nonlinear dynamical law governs magnetic field induced changes in lymphoid phenotype. Bioelectromagnetics, 2001,22(8):529–546

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Karimi A, Ghadiri Moghaddam F, Valipour M. Insights in the biology of extremely low-frequency magnetic fields exposure on human health. Mol Biol Rep, 2020,47(7):5621–5633

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. IARC, Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Non-Ionizing Radiation, Part 1: Static and extremely low-frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum, 2002,80:1–395

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kheifets L, Swanson J. Childhood Leukemia and Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields: Critical Evaluation of Epidemiologic Evidence Using Hill’s Framework. In: Roosli M, eds. Epidemiology of Electromagnetic Fields. New York: CRC Press, 2014:141–160

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ahlbom A, Day N, Feychting M, et al. A pooled analysis of magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia. Br J Cancer, 2000,83(5):692–698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kheifets L, Ahlbom A, Crespi CM, et al. Pooled analysis of recent studies on magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia. Br J Cancer, 2010,103(7):1128–1135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kheifets L, Monroe J, Vergara X, et al. Occupational electromagnetic fields and leukemia and brain cancer: an update to two meta-analyses. J Occup Environ Med, 2008,50(6):677–688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sinha RK. Chronic non-thermal exposure of modulated 2450 MHz microwave radiation alters thyroid hormones and behavior of male rats. Int J Radiat Biol, 2008,84(6):505–513

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hajizadeh R, Mehri A, Razavi SMH, et al. Effect of occupational exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on level of thyroid hormones effective on fatigue. Iran Occup Health J, 2019,16(1):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lope V, Pérez-Gómez B, Aragonés N, et al. Occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and electromagnetic fields in relation to the risk of thyroid cancer in Sweden. Scand J Work Environ Health, 2006,32(4):276–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. de Vocht F. Interpretation of Timetrends (1996–2017) of the Incidence of Selected Cancers in England in Relation to Mobile Phone Use as a Possible Risk Factor. Bioelectromagnetics, 2021,42(8):609–615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fiore M, Oliveri Conti G, Caltabiano R, et al. Role of Emerging Environmental Risk Factors in Thyroid Cancer: A Brief Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2019,16(7):1185

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Vaccarella S, Franceschi S, Bray F, et al. Worldwide Thyroid-Cancer Epidemic? The Increasing Impact of Overdiagnosis. N Engl J Med, 2016,375(7):614–617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mariotti S, Beck-Peccoz P, Feingold S, et al. Physiology of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Thyroid Axis. Available online: https://www.endotext.org/chapter/physiology-of-the-hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid-axis/(Last accessed on 10 Jon 2022).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kunt H, Şentürk İ, Gönül Y, et al. Effects of electromagnetic radiation exposure on bone mineral density, thyroid, and oxidative stress index in electrical workers. Onco Targets Ther, 2016,9:745–754

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Chinese Society of Endocrinology C, Association EGoSBoCM, Cancer HaNOCoCAA, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Chin J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (Chinese), 2013,33(2):96–115

    Google Scholar 

  25. Engineers IoEaE. IEEE Recommended Practice for Measurements and Computations of Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields with Respect to Human Exposure to Such Fields, 0 Hz to 100 kHz. IEEE Std C95.3.1™-2010, 2010:1–101

    Google Scholar 

  26. Amin AI, Hegazy NM, Ibrahim KS, et al. Thyroid Hormone Indices in Computer Workers with Emphasis on the Role of Zinc Supplementation. Open Access Maced J Med Sci, 2016,4(2):296–301

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Rajkovic V, Matavulj M, Gledic D, et al. Evaluation of rat thyroid gland morphophysiological status after three months exposure to 50 Hz electromagnetic field. Tissue Cell, 2003,35(3):223–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rajkovic V, Matavulj M, Johansson O. Studies on the synergistic effects of extremely low-frequency magnetic fields and the endocrine-disrupting compound atrazine on the thyroid gland. Int J Radiat Biol, 2010,86(12):1050–1060

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Asl JF, Larijani B, Zakerkish M, et al. The possible global hazard of cell phone radiation on thyroid cells and hormones: a systematic review of evidences. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2019,26(18):18017–18031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Alkayyali T, Ochuba O, Srivastava K, et al. An Exploration of the Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation Emitted by Mobile Phones and Extremely Low Frequency Radiation on Thyroid Hormones and Thyroid Gland Histopathology. Cureus, 2021,13(8):e17329

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Rosado MM, Simkó M, Mattsson MO, et al. Immune-Modulating Perspectives for Low Frequency Electromagnetic Fields in Innate Immunity. Front Public Health, 2018 Mar 26,6:85

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Bagheri Hosseinabadi M, Khanjani N, Mirzaii M, et al. DNA damage from long-term occupational exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields among power plant workers. Mutat Res, 2019,846:403079

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang Y, Lai J, Ruan G, et al. Meta-analysis of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and cancer risk: a pooled analysis of epidemiologic studies. Environ Int, 2016,88:36–43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kato I, Young A, Liu J, et al. Electric Blanket Use and Risk of Thyroid Cancer in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Cohort. Women Health, 2015,55(7):829–841

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang H, Tang X, Li W, et al. Enhanced osteogenesis of bone marrow stem cells cultured on hydroxyapatite/collagen I scaffold in the presence of low-frequency magnetic field. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2019,30(8):89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ross CL, Ang DC, Almeida-Porada G. Targeting Mesenchymal Stromal Cells/Pericytes (MSCs) With Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Has the Potential to Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis. Front Immunol, 2019,10:266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Vadalà M, Morales-Medina JC, Vallelunga A, et al. Mechanisms and therapeutic effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in oncology. Cancer Med, 2016,5(11):3128–3139

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hua Wu or Tie-jun Yin.

Ethics declarations

The authors of this manuscript declare they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

This project was supported by the National Military Research Project of China (No. JGXM201507).

Supplementary Materials

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fang, Yy., Tu, Q., Zhang, Yt. et al. Effect of Occupational Extremely Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure on the Thyroid Gland of Workers: A Prospective Study. CURR MED SCI 42, 817–823 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-022-2610-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-022-2610-8

Key words

Navigation