Abstract
When subchondral bone defects are present in osteochondral lesions of the talus (OCLT), it is inconclusive whether to allow early weightbearing after microfracture treatment because of the lack of effective support of the newly-formed fibrocartilage. After performing arthroscopic debridement and microfracture treatment on OCLT patients with subchondral bone defects, we allowed patients to have an early postoperative weightbearing exercise to observe their clinical outcome. Forty-two OCLT patients with subchondral bone defects were analyzed. Patients were randomly divided into two groups with 21 patients in each group. After arthroscopic debridement and microfracture treatment, group A was allowed to have early partial weightbearing while weightbearing was delayed in group B. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate joint pain before and after surgery. American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score was used to evaluate joint function. Tegner activity scale was used to assess patient’s exercise level. The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score in group A increased from 54.4 to 87.6, and that in group B increased from 54.9 to 87.3. The VAS score in group A decreased from 6.5 to 2.2, and that in group B decreased from 6.4 to 2.3. The Tegner activity scale increased from 2.6 to 4.4 in group A, and that in group B increased from 2.6 to 3.9. There was significant difference in the Tegner activity scale between group A and group B (P<0.05). It was suggested that when performing microfracture treatment on OCLT patients with subchondral bone defects, early postoperative weightbearing may achieve similar clinical outcomes as delayed weightbearing, and patients may be better able to return to sports.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Looze CA, Capo J, Ryan MK, et al. Evaluation and Management of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus. Cartilage, 2017,8(1):19–30
Ng A, Bernhard A, Bernhard K. Advances in Ankle Cartilage Repair. Clin Podiatr Med Surg, 2017,34(4):471–487
Verhagen RA, Struijs PA, Bossuyt PM, et al. Systematic review of treatment strategies for osteochondral defects of the talar dome. Foot Ankle Clin, 2003,8(2):233–242
Medda S, Al’Khafaji IM, Scott AT. Ankle Arthroscopy with Microfracture for Osteochondral Defects of the Talus. Arthrosc Tech, 2017,6(1):e167–e174
Buckwalter JA, Mow VC, Ratcliffe A. Restoration of injured or degenerated articular cartilage. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 1994,2(4):192–201
Becher C, Driessen A, Hess T, et al. Microfracture for chondral defects of the talus: maintenance of early results at midterm follow–up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2010,18(5):656–663
Polat G, Karademir G, Akalan E, et al. Patient compliance with touchdown weightbearing after microfracture treatment of talar osteochondral lesions. J Orthop Surg Res, 2017,12(1):46
Berndt AL, Harty M. Transchondral fractures (osteochondritis dissecans) of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2004,86–A(6):1336
Mintz DN, Tashjian GS, Connell DA, et al. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: a new magnetic resonance grading system with arthroscopic correlation. Arthroscopy, 2003,19(4):353–359
Cheng JC, Ferkel RD. The role of arthroscopy in ankle and subtalar degenerative joint disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1998,349(349):65–72
Kitaoka H, Alexander I, Adelaar R, et al. Clinical rating system for the ankle–hindfoot, midfoot, hallux and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int, 1994,15(7):349–353
Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1985,198(198):43–49
Savage–Elliott I, Ross KA, Smyth NA, et al. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: a current concepts review and evidence–based treatment paradigm. Foot Ankle Spec, 2014,7(5):414–422
Park HW, Lee KB. Comparison of chondral versus osteochondral lesions of the talus after arthroscopic microfracture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2015,23(3):860–867
Polat G, Ersen A, Erdil ME, et al. Long–term results of microfracture in the treatment of talus osteochondral lesions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2016,24(4):1299–1303
Choi JI, Lee KB. Comparison of clinical outcomes between arthroscopic subchondral drilling and microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2016,24(7):2140–2147
Grambart ST. Arthroscopic Management of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus. Clin Pediatr Med Surg, 2016,33(4):521–530
Guney A, Yurdakul E, Karaman I, et al. Mediumterm outcomes of mosaicplasty versus arthroscopic microfracture with or without platelet–rich plasma in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2016,24(4):1293–1298
Kok AC, Dunnen Sd, Tuijthof GJ, et al. Is technique performance a prognostic factor in bone marrow stimulation of the talus? J Foot Ankle Surg, 2012,51 (6):777–782
Becher C, Driessen A, Hess T, et al. Microfracture for chondral defects of the talus: maintenance of early results at midterm follow–up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2010,18(5):656–663
Ferkel RD, Zanotti RM, Komenda GA, et al. Arthroscopic treatment of chronic osteochondral lesions of the talus: long–term results. Am J Sports Med, 2008,36(9):1750–1762
Li S, Li H, Liu Y, et al. Clinical outcomes of early weight–bearing after arthroscopic microfracture during the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Chin Med J (Engl), 2014,127(13):2470–2474
Lee DH, Lee KB, Jung ST, et al. Comparison of early versus delayed weightbearing outcomes after microfracture for small to midsized osteochondral lesions of the talus. Am J Sports Med, 2012,40(9):2023–2028
McCollum GA, Myerson MS, Jonck J. Managing the cystic osteochondral defect: allograft or autograft. Foot Ankle Clin, 2013,18(1):113–133
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wei, M., Wei, Y. & Liu, Y. Effects of Early Weightbearing on Microfracture Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of Talus with Subchondral Bone Defects. CURR MED SCI 39, 88–93 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-019-2004-8
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-019-2004-8