Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Early Weightbearing on Microfracture Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of Talus with Subchondral Bone Defects

  • Published:
Current Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When subchondral bone defects are present in osteochondral lesions of the talus (OCLT), it is inconclusive whether to allow early weightbearing after microfracture treatment because of the lack of effective support of the newly-formed fibrocartilage. After performing arthroscopic debridement and microfracture treatment on OCLT patients with subchondral bone defects, we allowed patients to have an early postoperative weightbearing exercise to observe their clinical outcome. Forty-two OCLT patients with subchondral bone defects were analyzed. Patients were randomly divided into two groups with 21 patients in each group. After arthroscopic debridement and microfracture treatment, group A was allowed to have early partial weightbearing while weightbearing was delayed in group B. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate joint pain before and after surgery. American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score was used to evaluate joint function. Tegner activity scale was used to assess patient’s exercise level. The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score in group A increased from 54.4 to 87.6, and that in group B increased from 54.9 to 87.3. The VAS score in group A decreased from 6.5 to 2.2, and that in group B decreased from 6.4 to 2.3. The Tegner activity scale increased from 2.6 to 4.4 in group A, and that in group B increased from 2.6 to 3.9. There was significant difference in the Tegner activity scale between group A and group B (P<0.05). It was suggested that when performing microfracture treatment on OCLT patients with subchondral bone defects, early postoperative weightbearing may achieve similar clinical outcomes as delayed weightbearing, and patients may be better able to return to sports.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Looze CA, Capo J, Ryan MK, et al. Evaluation and Management of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus. Cartilage, 2017,8(1):19–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ng A, Bernhard A, Bernhard K. Advances in Ankle Cartilage Repair. Clin Podiatr Med Surg, 2017,34(4):471–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Verhagen RA, Struijs PA, Bossuyt PM, et al. Systematic review of treatment strategies for osteochondral defects of the talar dome. Foot Ankle Clin, 2003,8(2):233–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Medda S, Al’Khafaji IM, Scott AT. Ankle Arthroscopy with Microfracture for Osteochondral Defects of the Talus. Arthrosc Tech, 2017,6(1):e167–e174

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Buckwalter JA, Mow VC, Ratcliffe A. Restoration of injured or degenerated articular cartilage. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 1994,2(4):192–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Becher C, Driessen A, Hess T, et al. Microfracture for chondral defects of the talus: maintenance of early results at midterm follow–up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2010,18(5):656–663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Polat G, Karademir G, Akalan E, et al. Patient compliance with touchdown weightbearing after microfracture treatment of talar osteochondral lesions. J Orthop Surg Res, 2017,12(1):46

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Berndt AL, Harty M. Transchondral fractures (osteochondritis dissecans) of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2004,86–A(6):1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mintz DN, Tashjian GS, Connell DA, et al. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: a new magnetic resonance grading system with arthroscopic correlation. Arthroscopy, 2003,19(4):353–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng JC, Ferkel RD. The role of arthroscopy in ankle and subtalar degenerative joint disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1998,349(349):65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kitaoka H, Alexander I, Adelaar R, et al. Clinical rating system for the ankle–hindfoot, midfoot, hallux and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int, 1994,15(7):349–353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1985,198(198):43–49

    Google Scholar 

  13. Savage–Elliott I, Ross KA, Smyth NA, et al. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: a current concepts review and evidence–based treatment paradigm. Foot Ankle Spec, 2014,7(5):414–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Park HW, Lee KB. Comparison of chondral versus osteochondral lesions of the talus after arthroscopic microfracture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2015,23(3):860–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Polat G, Ersen A, Erdil ME, et al. Long–term results of microfracture in the treatment of talus osteochondral lesions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2016,24(4):1299–1303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Choi JI, Lee KB. Comparison of clinical outcomes between arthroscopic subchondral drilling and microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2016,24(7):2140–2147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Grambart ST. Arthroscopic Management of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus. Clin Pediatr Med Surg, 2016,33(4):521–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guney A, Yurdakul E, Karaman I, et al. Mediumterm outcomes of mosaicplasty versus arthroscopic microfracture with or without platelet–rich plasma in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2016,24(4):1293–1298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kok AC, Dunnen Sd, Tuijthof GJ, et al. Is technique performance a prognostic factor in bone marrow stimulation of the talus? J Foot Ankle Surg, 2012,51 (6):777–782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Becher C, Driessen A, Hess T, et al. Microfracture for chondral defects of the talus: maintenance of early results at midterm follow–up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2010,18(5):656–663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ferkel RD, Zanotti RM, Komenda GA, et al. Arthroscopic treatment of chronic osteochondral lesions of the talus: long–term results. Am J Sports Med, 2008,36(9):1750–1762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Li S, Li H, Liu Y, et al. Clinical outcomes of early weight–bearing after arthroscopic microfracture during the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Chin Med J (Engl), 2014,127(13):2470–2474

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lee DH, Lee KB, Jung ST, et al. Comparison of early versus delayed weightbearing outcomes after microfracture for small to midsized osteochondral lesions of the talus. Am J Sports Med, 2012,40(9):2023–2028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McCollum GA, Myerson MS, Jonck J. Managing the cystic osteochondral defect: allograft or autograft. Foot Ankle Clin, 2013,18(1):113–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Wei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, M., Wei, Y. & Liu, Y. Effects of Early Weightbearing on Microfracture Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of Talus with Subchondral Bone Defects. CURR MED SCI 39, 88–93 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-019-2004-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-019-2004-8

Key words

Navigation